Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pennsylvania 6 | N/A | 233.1 (231.9, 234.3) | N/A | 32,221 | falling | -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) | N/A | 734,330 | stable | -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0) |
Adams County 6 | Urban | 211.9 (199.2, 225.2) | 59 (41, 67) | 243 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Allegheny County 6 | Urban | 235.5 (231.5, 239.4) | 41 (29, 47) | 3,117 | falling | -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8) |
Armstrong County 6 | Urban | 261.1 (243.6, 279.6) | 5 (1, 43) | 198 | rising | 1.0 (0.1, 2.0) |
Beaver County 6 | Urban | 250.8 (240.0, 262.1) | 19 (3, 41) | 475 | rising | 0.5 (0.1, 0.9) |
Bedford County 6 | Rural | 236.6 (216.7, 258.1) | 39 (4, 64) | 124 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3) |
Berks County 6 | Urban | 229.8 (223.2, 236.5) | 45 (31, 56) | 1,024 | stable | -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2) |
Blair County 6 | Urban | 254.4 (241.6, 267.7) | 14 (2, 40) | 339 | rising | 0.9 (0.3, 1.4) |
Bradford County 6 | Rural | 257.2 (238.5, 276.9) | 7 (1, 48) | 167 | rising | 0.7 (0.1, 1.3) |
Bucks County 6 | Urban | 227.9 (222.8, 233.2) | 47 (35, 55) | 1,712 | falling | -4.2 (-7.0, -1.4) |
Butler County 6 | Urban | 217.3 (208.0, 226.9) | 56 (39, 65) | 469 | falling | -6.5 (-10.4, -2.6) |
Cambria County 6 | Urban | 246.6 (234.6, 259.1) | 25 (5, 47) | 373 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
Cameron County 6 | Rural | 288.7 (217.9, 377.3) | 2 (1, 67) | 15 | rising | 3.0 (0.8, 5.4) |
Carbon County 6 | Urban | 250.5 (233.8, 268.3) | 20 (2, 50) | 194 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Centre County 6 | Urban | 200.2 (189.4, 211.4) | 66 (55, 67) | 285 | stable | -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2) |
Chester County 6 | Urban | 210.0 (204.5, 215.7) | 61 (53, 66) | 1,189 | falling | -5.2 (-8.5, -1.9) |
Clarion County 6 | Rural | 209.0 (187.6, 232.2) | 62 (29, 67) | 81 | falling | -1.8 (-9.8, -0.7) |
Clearfield County 6 | Rural | 217.3 (203.3, 232.1) | 55 (34, 67) | 203 | stable | -1.0 (-12.4, 2.1) |
Clinton County 6 | Rural | 253.7 (230.1, 279.2) | 15 (1, 56) | 97 | stable | 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4) |
Columbia County 6 | Rural | 245.9 (228.1, 264.8) | 26 (2, 57) | 163 | falling | -2.4 (-11.4, -0.1) |
Crawford County 6 | Rural | 237.2 (222.4, 252.9) | 37 (7, 60) | 222 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9) |
Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 217.1 (208.9, 225.5) | 57 (41, 65) | 576 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3) |
Dauphin County 6 | Urban | 228.5 (220.5, 236.7) | 46 (29, 58) | 682 | stable | -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3) |
Delaware County 6 | Urban | 226.5 (220.9, 232.3) | 49 (37, 57) | 1,366 | falling | -6.2 (-9.6, -2.8) |
Elk County 6 | Rural | 236.8 (212.6, 263.4) | 38 (3, 65) | 85 | stable | -1.6 (-8.5, 0.7) |
Erie County 6 | Urban | 251.8 (243.1, 260.7) | 18 (4, 36) | 716 | rising | 2.1 (0.7, 4.4) |
Fayette County 6 | Urban | 245.4 (233.4, 258.0) | 30 (5, 49) | 357 | falling | -4.8 (-9.0, -0.2) |
Forest County 6 | Rural | 208.5 (150.2, 296.5) | 63 (1, 67) | 16 | stable | 1.7 (-0.8, 4.3) |
Franklin County 6 | Urban | 201.3 (191.1, 211.9) | 65 (55, 67) | 324 | falling | -7.3 (-14.5, -0.9) |
Fulton County 6 | Rural | 191.7 (161.0, 227.1) | 67 (28, 67) | 32 | stable | -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1) |
Greene County 6 | Rural | 256.7 (233.5, 281.8) | 9 (1, 53) | 101 | stable | 1.0 (0.0, 2.1) |
Huntingdon County 6 | Rural | 225.8 (206.2, 247.0) | 50 (10, 66) | 108 | stable | 0.9 (-0.3, 2.0) |
Indiana County 6 | Rural | 223.8 (208.5, 239.9) | 52 (22, 66) | 188 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
Jefferson County 6 | Rural | 239.6 (219.1, 261.7) | 35 (3, 63) | 117 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
Juniata County 6 | Rural | 246.7 (218.0, 278.2) | 24 (1, 65) | 62 | rising | 2.6 (1.5, 3.9) |
Lackawanna County 6 | Urban | 252.7 (243.0, 262.7) | 16 (3, 37) | 577 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3) |
Lancaster County 6 | Urban | 224.5 (218.6, 230.5) | 51 (39, 59) | 1,214 | falling | -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1) |
Lawrence County 6 | Urban | 245.9 (230.8, 261.8) | 27 (3, 52) | 233 | stable | 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Lebanon County 6 | Urban | 211.6 (200.7, 222.9) | 60 (44, 67) | 313 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Lehigh County 6 | Urban | 245.7 (238.5, 253.1) | 28 (10, 41) | 941 | stable | -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3) |
Luzerne County 6 | Urban | 260.7 (252.7, 268.8) | 6 (2, 28) | 904 | stable | 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5) |
Lycoming County 6 | Urban | 249.1 (236.0, 262.8) | 22 (3, 46) | 307 | stable | -0.9 (-2.6, 0.0) |
McKean County 6 | Rural | 233.9 (212.5, 257.0) | 43 (4, 65) | 101 | stable | -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
Mercer County 6 | Rural | 243.0 (229.9, 256.7) | 33 (6, 52) | 300 | falling | -2.5 (-6.3, -0.2) |
Mifflin County 6 | Rural | 245.5 (224.9, 267.6) | 29 (2, 59) | 120 | stable | 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Monroe County 6 | Rural | 254.9 (244.1, 266.0) | 12 (2, 37) | 502 | rising | 1.8 (0.8, 4.3) |
Montgomery County 6 | Urban | 221.0 (216.5, 225.5) | 53 (44, 60) | 2,028 | falling | -1.7 (-3.7, -1.0) |
Montour County 6 | Rural | 298.0 (262.2, 337.5) | 1 (1, 34) | 58 | stable | 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9) |
Northampton County 6 | Urban | 254.8 (246.7, 263.1) | 13 (4, 33) | 849 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.1) |
Northumberland County 6 | Rural | 252.6 (238.2, 267.7) | 17 (2, 44) | 263 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2) |
Perry County 6 | Urban | 239.2 (219.6, 260.1) | 36 (4, 62) | 126 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Philadelphia County 6 | Urban | 232.8 (229.3, 236.4) | 44 (32, 49) | 3,585 | falling | -2.4 (-3.3, -1.8) |
Pike County 6 | Rural | 245.0 (227.2, 263.9) | 31 (3, 55) | 173 | stable | 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4) |
Potter County 6 | Rural | 234.9 (200.2, 274.2) | 42 (1, 67) | 40 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3) |
Schuylkill County 6 | Rural | 266.2 (254.4, 278.4) | 4 (1, 26) | 434 | rising | 0.5 (0.1, 1.0) |
Snyder County 6 | Rural | 247.2 (225.1, 271.1) | 23 (2, 61) | 103 | stable | 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9) |
Somerset County 6 | Rural | 250.5 (234.3, 267.5) | 21 (2, 50) | 208 | stable | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7) |
Sullivan County 6 | Rural | 256.9 (197.9, 331.1) | 8 (1, 67) | 20 | stable | 1.0 (-2.0, 4.0) |
Susquehanna County 6 | Rural | 244.8 (222.7, 268.7) | 32 (2, 60) | 114 | falling | -2.7 (-6.4, -0.9) |
Tioga County 6 | Rural | 220.3 (199.5, 242.8) | 54 (15, 67) | 98 | stable | -1.2 (-8.5, 0.1) |
Union County 6 | Rural | 226.9 (206.4, 249.0) | 48 (6, 66) | 96 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2) |
Venango County 6 | Rural | 255.9 (236.1, 277.2) | 10 (1, 49) | 152 | stable | -1.9 (-8.4, 0.1) |
Warren County 6 | Rural | 241.2 (219.2, 264.9) | 34 (2, 62) | 108 | stable | -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0) |
Washington County 6 | Urban | 255.5 (245.7, 265.6) | 11 (3, 36) | 594 | stable | 0.5 (0.0, 1.0) |
Wayne County 6 | Rural | 207.9 (190.7, 226.4) | 64 (37, 67) | 129 | stable | -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
Westmoreland County 6 | Urban | 215.7 (208.8, 222.8) | 58 (47, 64) | 881 | falling | -8.2 (-11.5, -5.8) |
Wyoming County 6 | Urban | 268.2 (240.2, 298.9) | 3 (1, 50) | 78 | stable | 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5) |
York County 6 | Urban | 235.8 (229.4, 242.3) | 40 (25, 49) | 1,153 | stable | -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:25 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:25 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.