Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 233.1 (231.9, 234.3) N/A 32,221 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adams County 6 Urban 211.9 (199.2, 225.2) 59 (41, 67) 243 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 235.5 (231.5, 239.4) 41 (29, 47) 3,117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 261.1 (243.6, 279.6) 5 (1, 43) 198 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.0)
Beaver County 6 Urban 250.8 (240.0, 262.1) 19 (3, 41) 475 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Bedford County 6 Rural 236.6 (216.7, 258.1) 39 (4, 64) 124 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Berks County 6 Urban 229.8 (223.2, 236.5) 45 (31, 56) 1,024 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Blair County 6 Urban 254.4 (241.6, 267.7) 14 (2, 40) 339 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.4)
Bradford County 6 Rural 257.2 (238.5, 276.9) 7 (1, 48) 167 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Bucks County 6 Urban 227.9 (222.8, 233.2) 47 (35, 55) 1,712 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.0, -1.4)
Butler County 6 Urban 217.3 (208.0, 226.9) 56 (39, 65) 469 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.4, -2.6)
Cambria County 6 Urban 246.6 (234.6, 259.1) 25 (5, 47) 373 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Cameron County 6 Rural 288.7 (217.9, 377.3) 2 (1, 67) 15 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.4)
Carbon County 6 Urban 250.5 (233.8, 268.3) 20 (2, 50) 194 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Centre County 6 Urban 200.2 (189.4, 211.4) 66 (55, 67) 285 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Chester County 6 Urban 210.0 (204.5, 215.7) 61 (53, 66) 1,189 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.5, -1.9)
Clarion County 6 Rural 209.0 (187.6, 232.2) 62 (29, 67) 81 falling falling trend -1.8 (-9.8, -0.7)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 217.3 (203.3, 232.1) 55 (34, 67) 203 stable stable trend -1.0 (-12.4, 2.1)
Clinton County 6 Rural 253.7 (230.1, 279.2) 15 (1, 56) 97 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Columbia County 6 Rural 245.9 (228.1, 264.8) 26 (2, 57) 163 falling falling trend -2.4 (-11.4, -0.1)
Crawford County 6 Rural 237.2 (222.4, 252.9) 37 (7, 60) 222 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 217.1 (208.9, 225.5) 57 (41, 65) 576 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 228.5 (220.5, 236.7) 46 (29, 58) 682 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Delaware County 6 Urban 226.5 (220.9, 232.3) 49 (37, 57) 1,366 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.6, -2.8)
Elk County 6 Rural 236.8 (212.6, 263.4) 38 (3, 65) 85 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.5, 0.7)
Erie County 6 Urban 251.8 (243.1, 260.7) 18 (4, 36) 716 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 4.4)
Fayette County 6 Urban 245.4 (233.4, 258.0) 30 (5, 49) 357 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.0, -0.2)
Forest County 6 Rural 208.5 (150.2, 296.5) 63 (1, 67) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.3)
Franklin County 6 Urban 201.3 (191.1, 211.9) 65 (55, 67) 324 falling falling trend -7.3 (-14.5, -0.9)
Fulton County 6 Rural 191.7 (161.0, 227.1) 67 (28, 67) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1)
Greene County 6 Rural 256.7 (233.5, 281.8) 9 (1, 53) 101 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 225.8 (206.2, 247.0) 50 (10, 66) 108 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.0)
Indiana County 6 Rural 223.8 (208.5, 239.9) 52 (22, 66) 188 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 239.6 (219.1, 261.7) 35 (3, 63) 117 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Juniata County 6 Rural 246.7 (218.0, 278.2) 24 (1, 65) 62 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.5, 3.9)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 252.7 (243.0, 262.7) 16 (3, 37) 577 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 224.5 (218.6, 230.5) 51 (39, 59) 1,214 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 245.9 (230.8, 261.8) 27 (3, 52) 233 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 211.6 (200.7, 222.9) 60 (44, 67) 313 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 245.7 (238.5, 253.1) 28 (10, 41) 941 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 260.7 (252.7, 268.8) 6 (2, 28) 904 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 249.1 (236.0, 262.8) 22 (3, 46) 307 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.0)
McKean County 6 Rural 233.9 (212.5, 257.0) 43 (4, 65) 101 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Mercer County 6 Rural 243.0 (229.9, 256.7) 33 (6, 52) 300 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.3, -0.2)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 245.5 (224.9, 267.6) 29 (2, 59) 120 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 254.9 (244.1, 266.0) 12 (2, 37) 502 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.8, 4.3)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 221.0 (216.5, 225.5) 53 (44, 60) 2,028 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.7, -1.0)
Montour County 6 Rural 298.0 (262.2, 337.5) 1 (1, 34) 58 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Northampton County 6 Urban 254.8 (246.7, 263.1) 13 (4, 33) 849 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.1)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 252.6 (238.2, 267.7) 17 (2, 44) 263 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Perry County 6 Urban 239.2 (219.6, 260.1) 36 (4, 62) 126 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 232.8 (229.3, 236.4) 44 (32, 49) 3,585 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.8)
Pike County 6 Rural 245.0 (227.2, 263.9) 31 (3, 55) 173 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Potter County 6 Rural 234.9 (200.2, 274.2) 42 (1, 67) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 266.2 (254.4, 278.4) 4 (1, 26) 434 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.0)
Snyder County 6 Rural 247.2 (225.1, 271.1) 23 (2, 61) 103 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Somerset County 6 Rural 250.5 (234.3, 267.5) 21 (2, 50) 208 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Sullivan County 6 Rural 256.9 (197.9, 331.1) 8 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.0)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 244.8 (222.7, 268.7) 32 (2, 60) 114 falling falling trend -2.7 (-6.4, -0.9)
Tioga County 6 Rural 220.3 (199.5, 242.8) 54 (15, 67) 98 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.5, 0.1)
Union County 6 Rural 226.9 (206.4, 249.0) 48 (6, 66) 96 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Venango County 6 Rural 255.9 (236.1, 277.2) 10 (1, 49) 152 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.4, 0.1)
Warren County 6 Rural 241.2 (219.2, 264.9) 34 (2, 62) 108 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 255.5 (245.7, 265.6) 11 (3, 36) 594 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.0)
Wayne County 6 Rural 207.9 (190.7, 226.4) 64 (37, 67) 129 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 215.7 (208.8, 222.8) 58 (47, 64) 881 falling falling trend -8.2 (-11.5, -5.8)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 268.2 (240.2, 298.9) 3 (1, 50) 78 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
York County 6 Urban 235.8 (229.4, 242.3) 40 (25, 49) 1,153 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top