Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 109.7 (108.7, 110.8) N/A 8,236 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Cameron County 6 Rural 156.0 (88.8, 253.2) 1 (1, 67) 3 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.2, 9.4)
Forest County 6 Rural 88.6 (51.0, 175.4) 31 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend 4.5 (-2.6, 12.7)
Sullivan County 6 Rural 146.3 (87.7, 230.9) 3 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.2, 8.6)
Fulton County 6 Rural 95.2 (67.7, 130.1) 65 (3, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.6)
Potter County 6 Rural 137.2 (103.2, 178.6) 4 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.5)
Montour County 6 Rural 147.6 (115.8, 185.4) 2 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.2)
Juniata County 6 Rural 129.7 (103.3, 160.6) 7 (1, 65) 17 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.5, 5.6)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 131.3 (106.0, 160.8) 5 (1, 64) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
Clarion County 6 Rural 100.5 (81.5, 122.5) 59 (7, 67) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Elk County 6 Rural 128.7 (105.3, 155.8) 8 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.9, 2.0)
Warren County 6 Rural 112.8 (92.9, 135.8) 37 (2, 67) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.4)
Tioga County 6 Rural 106.6 (87.8, 128.2) 50 (4, 67) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Clinton County 6 Rural 115.6 (95.3, 138.9) 28 (2, 67) 23 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 118.1 (97.5, 141.7) 25 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend -16.3 (-35.8, 1.2)
Snyder County 6 Rural 111.9 (92.7, 133.8) 43 (2, 67) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 86.7 (71.8, 103.7) 67 (37, 67) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 95.9 (79.6, 114.6) 64 (18, 67) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.5)
Union County 6 Rural 102.7 (85.8, 122.1) 58 (8, 67) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.5)
Greene County 6 Rural 124.8 (104.4, 148.1) 14 (1, 63) 27 stable stable trend -10.7 (-22.2, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 115.5 (97.1, 136.3) 30 (2, 66) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.1, 1.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 106.5 (89.6, 125.7) 52 (6, 67) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
McKean County 6 Rural 126.0 (106.2, 148.6) 13 (1, 63) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 120.4 (101.7, 141.5) 23 (2, 65) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.3)
Venango County 6 Rural 125.9 (107.4, 146.6) 11 (1, 59) 33 stable stable trend -10.9 (-24.3, 2.0)
Bedford County 6 Rural 130.9 (111.7, 152.4) 6 (1, 58) 34 stable stable trend 0.5 (-6.4, 2.0)
Pike County 6 Rural 117.5 (101.0, 136.1) 26 (2, 65) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Bradford County 6 Rural 127.1 (110.0, 146.1) 10 (1, 56) 40 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.3)
Carbon County 6 Urban 110.6 (95.9, 127.0) 42 (5, 66) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Columbia County 6 Rural 120.5 (104.6, 138.2) 22 (2, 63) 42 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.3)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 90.9 (79.1, 103.9) 66 (38, 67) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.2)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 127.9 (111.9, 145.6) 9 (1, 54) 46 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 3.5)
Indiana County 6 Rural 112.3 (98.3, 127.7) 38 (5, 65) 48 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.0)
Crawford County 6 Rural 111.5 (98.1, 126.2) 40 (6, 66) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Somerset County 6 Rural 124.4 (109.7, 140.6) 15 (2, 58) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 122.5 (108.6, 137.7) 18 (2, 57) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.8)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 110.6 (98.1, 124.2) 45 (9, 65) 58 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Adams County 6 Urban 104.0 (92.4, 116.8) 56 (14, 67) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Mercer County 6 Rural 107.7 (96.2, 120.3) 48 (11, 65) 64 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 114.3 (102.8, 126.8) 33 (6, 63) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.9, -0.2)
Cambria County 6 Urban 109.7 (99.1, 121.2) 46 (12, 64) 79 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 97.6 (88.2, 107.7) 62 (34, 67) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Blair County 6 Urban 117.4 (106.2, 129.4) 27 (5, 60) 81 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Centre County 6 Urban 96.3 (87.0, 106.4) 63 (39, 67) 83 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Fayette County 6 Urban 113.2 (102.5, 124.7) 35 (8, 62) 84 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Franklin County 6 Urban 97.9 (88.9, 107.5) 61 (34, 67) 88 falling falling trend -6.8 (-13.8, -0.3)
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 114.4 (104.4, 125.2) 32 (7, 59) 96 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Beaver County 6 Urban 121.9 (112.0, 132.5) 20 (3, 49) 112 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Monroe County 6 Rural 121.6 (111.8, 132.1) 21 (4, 50) 115 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.0)
Butler County 6 Urban 110.1 (101.5, 119.2) 44 (14, 62) 122 falling falling trend -8.3 (-14.8, -1.5)
Washington County 6 Urban 125.9 (117.0, 135.4) 12 (2, 36) 148 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 122.8 (114.2, 132.0) 17 (4, 43) 150 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 103.3 (96.2, 110.8) 57 (28, 65) 158 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 106.9 (100.0, 114.2) 49 (22, 63) 180 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 118.9 (111.3, 126.9) 24 (7, 48) 183 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.8)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 104.8 (98.4, 111.5) 55 (29, 64) 203 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.6, -3.0)
Northampton County 6 Urban 124.6 (117.3, 132.2) 16 (4, 36) 223 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 122.2 (115.2, 129.6) 19 (5, 41) 229 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 115.6 (109.3, 122.1) 29 (12, 51) 258 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Berks County 6 Urban 111.8 (106.0, 117.9) 41 (18, 56) 275 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 0.4)
York County 6 Urban 113.1 (107.4, 118.9) 34 (16, 55) 303 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Chester County 6 Urban 105.2 (100.2, 110.4) 54 (32, 62) 334 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.1, -4.5)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 111.9 (106.7, 117.4) 39 (19, 54) 345 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Delaware County 6 Urban 108.7 (103.7, 113.8) 47 (26, 58) 365 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.6, -1.0)
Bucks County 6 Urban 106.6 (101.9, 111.4) 51 (31, 60) 396 falling falling trend -4.2 (-10.4, -0.7)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 105.6 (101.6, 109.7) 53 (34, 60) 539 falling falling trend -4.0 (-9.0, -1.6)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 112.6 (109.1, 116.1) 36 (23, 49) 812 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.8, -0.2)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 98.5 (95.7, 101.4) 60 (51, 65) 966 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -1.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 9:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top