Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 513.6 (511.3, 516.0) N/A 40,236 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 488.3 (487.8, 488.7) N/A 875,592 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Montour County 6 650.9 (585.8, 721.7) 1 (1, 10) 78 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Schuylkill County 6 596.6 (574.6, 619.3) 2 (1, 7) 584 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Luzerne County 6 575.5 (560.6, 590.8) 3 (1, 10) 1,183 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Columbia County 6 573.8 (540.7, 608.5) 4 (1, 26) 240 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Northampton County 6 558.7 (543.4, 574.4) 5 (3, 19) 1,064 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Elk County 6 553.5 (509.0, 601.4) 6 (1, 50) 126 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.5)
Armstrong County 6 550.9 (520.3, 583.1) 7 (2, 38) 264 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Northumberland County 6 549.6 (523.7, 576.6) 8 (2, 36) 356 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Lehigh County 6 548.7 (534.3, 563.5) 9 (4, 24) 1,142 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Blair County 6 545.8 (522.8, 569.8) 10 (3, 34) 448 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Mifflin County 6 544.6 (507.6, 583.8) 11 (2, 49) 172 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Berks County 6 542.9 (529.6, 556.4) 12 (5, 26) 1,341 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Sullivan County 6 539.7 (451.5, 644.9) 13 (1, 66) 31 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.6)
Philadelphia County 6 537.8 (530.1, 545.5) 14 (8, 24) 3,955 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -2.0)
Venango County 6 535.6 (501.6, 571.6) 15 (2, 51) 206 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lawrence County 6 535.2 (508.4, 563.1) 16 (3, 47) 323 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Mercer County 6 531.6 (508.2, 555.9) 17 (4, 44) 417 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Bucks County 6 528.9 (518.6, 539.4) 18 (10, 32) 2,149 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Somerset County 6 528.8 (501.2, 557.7) 19 (4, 49) 293 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Cambria County 6 527.0 (505.8, 549.0) 20 (6, 44) 502 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Lycoming County 6 526.9 (502.7, 552.1) 21 (5, 48) 382 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Washington County 6 525.7 (508.2, 543.8) 22 (7, 43) 734 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Delaware County 6 524.1 (512.5, 535.9) 23 (11, 38) 1,650 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.9)
Crawford County 6 520.8 (493.9, 548.9) 24 (6, 54) 307 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Lackawanna County 6 519.1 (501.5, 537.2) 25 (10, 46) 696 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Warren County 6 518.8 (481.8, 558.2) 26 (3, 60) 159 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Carbon County 6 517.4 (487.3, 549.1) 27 (5, 56) 239 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Perry County 6 517.4 (479.5, 557.7) 28 (3, 62) 153 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Butler County 6 514.7 (496.1, 533.9) 29 (11, 49) 619 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.6, 3.3)
Tioga County 6 513.0 (475.9, 552.6) 30 (4, 61) 155 stable stable trend -7.5 (-18.1, 4.6)
Erie County 6 512.7 (496.9, 528.8) 31 (14, 50) 854 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Wyoming County 6 508.8 (462.9, 558.5) 32 (3, 65) 101 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Monroe County 6 506.5 (486.8, 526.8) 33 (14, 55) 551 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Beaver County 6 506.2 (487.1, 525.9) 34 (14, 54) 575 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Allegheny County 6 505.2 (497.8, 512.8) 35 (25, 47) 3,769 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Montgomery County 6 505.2 (496.2, 514.4) 36 (24, 48) 2,488 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Adams County 6 504.1 (480.1, 529.2) 37 (11, 58) 352 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Fayette County 6 503.1 (481.9, 525.1) 38 (15, 58) 457 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Bradford County 6 501.6 (471.3, 533.5) 39 (9, 61) 220 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Jefferson County 6 501.4 (465.5, 539.6) 40 (5, 65) 155 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Dauphin County 6 500.1 (484.1, 516.6) 41 (21, 56) 785 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Greene County 6 500.1 (459.5, 543.5) 42 (5, 65) 120 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Clinton County 6 500.1 (460.2, 542.7) 43 (5, 65) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lancaster County 6 498.2 (487.1, 509.5) 44 (27, 53) 1,607 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
York County 6 495.8 (483.7, 508.1) 45 (28, 56) 1,343 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Cameron County 6 494.7 (398.3, 612.9) 46 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Clearfield County 6 491.3 (465.2, 518.6) 47 (16, 63) 277 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Huntingdon County 6 489.7 (455.3, 526.3) 48 (10, 65) 158 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Westmoreland County 6 484.9 (472.4, 497.6) 49 (35, 59) 1,248 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Bedford County 6 483.0 (450.2, 517.8) 50 (14, 65) 175 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Union County 6 481.0 (444.9, 519.5) 51 (13, 66) 134 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Lebanon County 6 480.9 (460.3, 502.3) 52 (29, 64) 429 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Potter County 6 479.7 (425.1, 540.2) 53 (5, 67) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Franklin County 6 477.9 (458.3, 498.0) 54 (32, 64) 472 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
McKean County 6 476.8 (440.1, 515.9) 55 (17, 66) 132 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Pike County 6 473.0 (443.1, 504.7) 56 (23, 66) 208 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Chester County 6 472.8 (461.6, 484.3) 57 (45, 63) 1,423 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -2.0)
Susquehanna County 6 472.4 (437.8, 509.5) 58 (21, 66) 154 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Snyder County 6 463.7 (426.3, 503.7) 59 (20, 67) 120 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Fulton County 6 457.9 (401.7, 520.9) 60 (9, 67) 50 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Cumberland County 6 456.7 (441.3, 472.5) 61 (50, 66) 695 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Clarion County 6 456.5 (418.9, 496.9) 62 (26, 67) 116 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.5)
Juniata County 6 454.3 (407.6, 505.1) 63 (19, 67) 74 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Wayne County 6 454.1 (424.9, 485.1) 64 (37, 67) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Centre County 6 448.5 (427.8, 469.9) 65 (50, 67) 372 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Indiana County 6 415.4 (390.7, 441.3) 66 (60, 67) 228 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.6)
Forest County 6 384.0 (306.7, 487.1) 67 (15, 67) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/29/2023 1:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top