Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 12.3 (12.1, 12.6) N/A 2,150 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Greene County 6 Rural 23.3 (17.6, 30.4) 1 (1, 25) 12 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.7, 8.5)
Perry County 6 Urban 20.3 (15.5, 26.3) 2 (1, 37) 13 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.2, 9.5)
Clinton County 6 Rural 18.1 (12.9, 24.7) 3 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 6.2)
Washington County 6 Urban 17.4 (15.2, 19.9) 4 (1, 25) 51 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.1, 4.5)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 17.0 (12.1, 23.5) 5 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.1)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 16.4 (13.6, 19.7) 6 (1, 44) 26 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.5)
Elk County 6 Rural 16.0 (11.0, 22.8) 7 (1, 62) 7 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.3, 8.8)
Somerset County 6 Rural 15.8 (12.4, 19.9) 8 (1, 53) 17 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.8, 6.4)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 15.8 (11.3, 21.5) 9 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.7)
Snyder County 6 Rural 15.6 (11.0, 21.7) 10 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.1, 6.0)
Pike County 6 Rural 15.6 (12.1, 20.0) 11 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.5)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 15.4 (13.4, 17.7) 12 (3, 39) 47 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 2.0)
Columbia County 6 Rural 15.3 (11.7, 19.7) 13 (2, 59) 13 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 15.3 (11.6, 20.0) 14 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.5)
Warren County 6 Rural 15.2 (11.1, 20.6) 15 (1, 62) 10
*
*
Cambria County 6 Urban 15.0 (12.6, 17.8) 16 (3, 48) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.2)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 14.5 (12.9, 16.2) 17 (6, 41) 67 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.4)
Northampton County 6 Urban 14.4 (12.7, 16.2) 18 (6, 44) 61 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 4.2)
Crawford County 6 Rural 14.4 (11.5, 17.8) 19 (3, 58) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 5.0)
Juniata County 6 Rural 14.3 (8.8, 22.3) 20 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 14.3 (12.1, 16.9) 21 (4, 51) 31 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
McKean County 6 Rural 14.3 (10.0, 20.0) 22 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 6.4)
Mercer County 6 Rural 14.2 (11.6, 17.2) 23 (3, 57) 24 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.0)
Blair County 6 Urban 14.0 (11.5, 16.9) 24 (4, 56) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.1)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 13.9 (9.0, 20.9) 25 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.4)
Montour County 6 Rural 13.8 (8.1, 22.6) 26 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 13.8 (11.7, 16.2) 27 (6, 55) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.9)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 13.5 (11.8, 15.4) 28 (9, 51) 49 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.2)
Tioga County 6 Rural 13.5 (9.6, 18.6) 29 (2, 63) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.7, 8.1)
Bradford County 6 Rural 13.5 (10.0, 17.9) 30 (3, 63) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.6, 5.3)
Erie County 6 Urban 13.4 (11.7, 15.4) 31 (9, 51) 46 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 13.3 (10.8, 16.4) 32 (5, 61) 20 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 5.8)
Union County 6 Rural 13.1 (9.1, 18.5) 33 (2, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 5.0)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 13.0 (11.3, 14.9) 34 (12, 56) 45 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.2, 1.2)
York County 6 Urban 13.0 (11.7, 14.3) 35 (15, 51) 79 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.6)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 12.8 (11.4, 14.4) 36 (14, 53) 70 falling falling trend -6.1 (-11.3, -0.4)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 12.8 (11.3, 14.4) 37 (14, 55) 59 stable stable trend 0.6 (-10.9, 4.1)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 12.7 (9.6, 16.6) 38 (4, 63) 13 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 6.0)
Bedford County 6 Rural 12.6 (9.1, 17.2) 39 (3, 63) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.1)
Fayette County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.2, 15.3) 40 (8, 62) 23 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.4, 4.7)
Beaver County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.5, 14.8) 41 (11, 61) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Carbon County 6 Urban 12.3 (9.3, 16.2) 42 (5, 63) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 7.1)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 12.1 (11.4, 12.9) 43 (27, 52) 205 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 11.8 (8.2, 16.8) 44 (4, 63) 8
*
*
Butler County 6 Urban 11.7 (9.9, 13.8) 45 (17, 62) 32 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.7)
Clarion County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.7, 16.8) 46 (4, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.2, 6.2)
Centre County 6 Urban 11.4 (9.3, 14.0) 47 (15, 63) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Bucks County 6 Urban 11.4 (10.4, 12.4) 48 (31, 59) 109 stable stable trend -0.4 (-8.6, 1.6)
Potter County 6 Rural 11.3 (6.1, 20.1) 49 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Lancaster County 6 Urban 11.3 (10.1, 12.5) 50 (30, 61) 79 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.1)
Adams County 6 Urban 11.2 (9.0, 14.0) 51 (15, 63) 18 stable stable trend -4.3 (-30.2, 4.4)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 11.1 (10.2, 12.0) 52 (35, 60) 128 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.3)
Indiana County 6 Rural 10.8 (8.2, 14.0) 53 (12, 63) 13 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.2, 7.1)
Berks County 6 Urban 10.7 (9.5, 12.1) 54 (33, 63) 60 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.1)
Delaware County 6 Urban 10.3 (9.2, 11.5) 55 (39, 63) 74 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 10.3 (9.6, 11.0) 56 (44, 62) 178 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Venango County 6 Rural 10.2 (7.1, 14.5) 57 (11, 63) 8 stable stable trend -24.6 (-55.2, 5.8)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.7, 15.0) 58 (7, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.1, 4.5)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 10.2 (7.8, 13.2) 59 (18, 63) 14 stable stable trend -12.0 (-28.5, 0.0)
Chester County 6 Urban 10.2 (9.1, 11.3) 60 (41, 63) 72 falling falling trend -10.8 (-19.8, -0.7)
Franklin County 6 Urban 10.2 (8.3, 12.4) 61 (29, 63) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 9.9 (8.0, 12.2) 62 (30, 63) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 9.1 (6.8, 12.1) 63 (28, 63) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Cameron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top