Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 14.5 (14.3, 14.8) N/A 2,618 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.5 (13.4, 13.5) N/A 54,094 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Adams County 6 Urban 14.5 (11.9, 17.6) 32 (2, 62) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.1)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 15.2 (14.3, 16.0) 21 (11, 41) 271 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.8, 2.0)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 15.5 (12.1, 19.7) 20 (1, 61) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.7, 6.9)
Beaver County 6 Urban 15.6 (13.5, 18.1) 16 (2, 54) 42 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.1)
Berks County 6 Urban 16.8 (15.3, 18.4) 7 (1, 33) 94 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.5)
Blair County 6 Urban 14.4 (12.0, 17.1) 36 (4, 61) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.7)
Bucks County 6 Urban 14.2 (13.1, 15.3) 38 (15, 54) 132 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Butler County 6 Urban 13.4 (11.6, 15.6) 49 (11, 62) 38 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.2)
Cambria County 6 Urban 13.3 (11.2, 15.8) 50 (8, 63) 29 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.1)
Carbon County 6 Urban 16.1 (12.8, 20.2) 14 (1, 61) 17 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.8)
Centre County 6 Urban 11.3 (9.2, 13.9) 60 (21, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Chester County 6 Urban 12.8 (11.6, 14.1) 55 (28, 62) 87 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 14.7 (12.9, 16.6) 30 (7, 57) 51 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 5.0)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 14.9 (13.2, 16.9) 25 (4, 55) 55 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.5)
Delaware County 6 Urban 13.7 (12.5, 15.0) 46 (18, 58) 100 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Erie County 6 Urban 14.1 (12.5, 16.0) 39 (9, 59) 53 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.1)
Fayette County 6 Urban 16.7 (14.2, 19.5) 8 (1, 49) 34 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Franklin County 6 Urban 14.9 (12.6, 17.4) 26 (3, 60) 33 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.1)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 13.2 (11.5, 15.2) 51 (14, 62) 43 stable stable trend -11.0 (-23.1, 0.6)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 13.1 (12.0, 14.4) 52 (24, 60) 100 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 3.0)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 14.7 (11.9, 18.2) 29 (2, 62) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 4.9)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 16.3 (13.8, 19.1) 13 (1, 55) 33 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.8)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 14.4 (12.9, 16.1) 35 (9, 57) 69 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.3)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 16.4 (14.7, 18.1) 12 (2, 41) 78 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.9)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 15.1 (12.6, 18.2) 22 (2, 59) 25 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.3, 6.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 14.2 (13.2, 15.2) 37 (17, 53) 166 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.1, 0.9)
Northampton County 6 Urban 16.6 (14.9, 18.5) 10 (2, 40) 74 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 3.0)
Perry County 6 Urban 16.6 (12.3, 22.2) 9 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.9)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 15.0 (14.2, 15.9) 24 (11, 44) 259 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 14.5 (12.7, 16.6) 31 (6, 58) 47 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 13.9 (12.5, 15.3) 43 (14, 58) 84 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 17.4 (11.6, 25.3) 6 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.4, 5.6)
York County 6 Urban 13.8 (12.5, 15.3) 44 (15, 58) 85 falling falling trend -8.9 (-14.3, -4.1)
Bedford County 6 Rural 12.6 (9.2, 17.0) 57 (4, 64) 10 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.2, 9.7)
Bradford County 6 Rural 15.6 (12.1, 19.9) 18 (1, 62) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 5.0)
Clarion County 6 Rural 14.5 (10.3, 20.1) 34 (1, 64) 8 falling falling trend -7.7 (-22.4, -1.4)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 10.5 (8.1, 13.5) 63 (31, 64) 14 falling falling trend -4.8 (-14.4, -0.7)
Clinton County 6 Rural 15.6 (11.1, 21.5) 17 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 7.0)
Columbia County 6 Rural 14.8 (11.5, 19.0) 27 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 13.5 (10.8, 16.8) 48 (4, 64) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
Elk County 6 Rural 10.9 (7.3, 16.2) 62 (5, 64) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.6)
Fulton County 6 Rural 13.7 (8.0, 23.1) 45 (1, 64) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 7.1)
Greene County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.0, 17.2) 59 (3, 64) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.4, 7.3)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 14.5 (10.8, 19.4) 33 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.2)
Indiana County 6 Rural 12.6 (9.9, 16.0) 56 (7, 64) 15 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.4, 17.8)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.8, 14.9) 64 (9, 64) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 7.5)
Juniata County 6 Rural 17.5 (12.0, 25.2) 4 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.5, 11.2)
McKean County 6 Rural 12.5 (8.7, 17.7) 58 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.0)
Mercer County 6 Rural 11.1 (9.0, 13.6) 61 (27, 64) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 18.2 (13.9, 23.6) 1 (1, 57) 13 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 7.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 13.5 (11.4, 15.9) 47 (8, 62) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.3)
Montour County 6 Rural 12.9 (7.6, 21.1) 53 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Northumberland County 6 Rural 17.5 (14.4, 21.1) 5 (1, 52) 25 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.9, 5.0)
Pike County 6 Rural 13.9 (10.8, 17.9) 41 (2, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 4.2)
Potter County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.8, 24.9) 23 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 18.1 (15.6, 20.9) 2 (1, 37) 40 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.0, 5.5)
Snyder County 6 Rural 15.6 (11.1, 21.4) 19 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.6, 11.9)
Somerset County 6 Rural 13.9 (11.1, 17.3) 42 (2, 63) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.8)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 17.6 (13.5, 23.0) 3 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.9)
Tioga County 6 Rural 14.1 (10.1, 19.3) 40 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.8)
Union County 6 Rural 12.9 (9.2, 17.8) 54 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 9.1)
Venango County 6 Rural 16.0 (12.2, 20.8) 15 (1, 62) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 6.3)
Warren County 6 Rural 16.4 (11.9, 22.3) 11 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.8, 9.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 14.8 (11.4, 19.2) 28 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4)
Cameron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/23/2025 11:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top