Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 *** 62.6 (62.1, 63.2) N/A 10,903 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Centre County 6 *** 45.1 (40.6, 49.9) 67 (58, 67) 76 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Union County 6 *** 46.1 (38.6, 54.7) 66 (43, 67) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Indiana County 6 *** 46.7 (41.3, 52.6) 65 (52, 67) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Snyder County 6 *** 47.4 (39.4, 56.6) 64 (36, 67) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Lancaster County 6 *** 51.1 (48.8, 53.6) 63 (53, 65) 363 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Chester County 6 *** 51.9 (49.4, 54.6) 62 (51, 65) 331 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Montgomery County 6 *** 52.2 (50.2, 54.2) 61 (52, 65) 573 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Somerset County 6 *** 53.7 (47.8, 60.1) 60 (31, 67) 64 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Cumberland County 6 *** 54.2 (50.7, 57.9) 59 (41, 65) 183 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Susquehanna County 6 *** 54.8 (47.1, 63.6) 58 (17, 67) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Sullivan County 6 *** 55.1 (37.3, 82.4) 57 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.5)
Potter County 6 *** 55.8 (44.0, 70.3) 56 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Juniata County 6 *** 56.5 (46.1, 68.9) 55 (4, 67) 21 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.0)
Huntingdon County 6 *** 56.7 (48.8, 65.7) 54 (11, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Lebanon County 6 *** 56.9 (52.2, 61.9) 53 (26, 64) 112 falling falling trend -6.9 (-12.5, -0.9)
Bedford County 6 *** 57.3 (50.1, 65.5) 52 (14, 66) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Wayne County 6 *** 57.7 (50.8, 65.6) 51 (12, 65) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Carbon County 6 *** 58.0 (51.3, 65.3) 50 (14, 65) 58 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Cambria County 6 *** 58.0 (53.4, 62.9) 49 (24, 62) 127 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Dauphin County 6 *** 58.0 (54.4, 61.8) 48 (27, 60) 207 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.3)
Bucks County 6 *** 58.6 (56.3, 60.9) 47 (32, 57) 512 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Mercer County 6 *** 59.3 (54.2, 64.9) 46 (17, 62) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Warren County 6 *** 59.4 (51.1, 68.8) 45 (5, 65) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Armstrong County 6 *** 59.7 (53.1, 66.9) 44 (9, 63) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Tioga County 6 *** 60.2 (51.9, 69.7) 43 (4, 65) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Clinton County 6 *** 60.4 (51.3, 70.8) 42 (3, 66) 32 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.1)
Franklin County 6 *** 60.4 (55.9, 65.3) 41 (16, 59) 134 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Columbia County 6 *** 60.4 (53.5, 68.2) 40 (8, 63) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Butler County 6 *** 60.5 (56.2, 65.0) 39 (18, 57) 158 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Clarion County 6 *** 60.5 (51.6, 70.8) 38 (3, 66) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Bradford County 6 *** 61.0 (54.1, 68.6) 37 (6, 62) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Clearfield County 6 *** 61.4 (55.2, 68.2) 36 (7, 61) 73 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 61.4 (58.5, 64.4) 35 (22, 52) 357 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Northampton County 6 *** 61.6 (58.2, 65.1) 34 (19, 54) 262 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Jefferson County 6 *** 61.6 (53.3, 71.0) 33 (2, 64) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.5)
Lehigh County 6 *** 61.8 (58.5, 65.1) 32 (20, 52) 284 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Elk County 6 *** 63.0 (53.4, 74.2) 31 (1, 64) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Berks County 6 *** 63.5 (60.4, 66.6) 30 (14, 47) 340 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Adams County 6 *** 64.1 (58.4, 70.3) 29 (4, 56) 96 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Erie County 6 *** 64.3 (60.6, 68.2) 28 (10, 48) 235 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Pike County 6 *** 65.3 (57.8, 73.6) 27 (2, 58) 59 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
York County 6 *** 65.4 (62.4, 68.4) 26 (10, 41) 385 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Mifflin County 6 *** 66.1 (57.9, 75.3) 25 (1, 58) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Lycoming County 6 *** 66.1 (60.5, 72.2) 24 (3, 51) 107 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Delaware County 6 *** 66.3 (63.5, 69.1) 23 (10, 37) 468 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.6, 0.4)
McKean County 6 *** 66.4 (57.3, 76.6) 22 (1, 60) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Cameron County 6 *** 66.5 (43.5, 101.1) 21 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Lackawanna County 6 *** 66.8 (62.6, 71.1) 20 (5, 41) 204 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Venango County 6 *** 67.6 (59.8, 76.3) 19 (1, 55) 58 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Monroe County 6 *** 67.7 (62.8, 72.9) 18 (2, 42) 149 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Allegheny County 6 *** 67.9 (66.1, 69.7) 17 (8, 28) 1,167 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Fulton County 6 *** 68.6 (54.2, 86.4) 16 (1, 65) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 3.0)
Beaver County 6 *** 69.1 (64.6, 74.0) 15 (2, 37) 179 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Montour County 6 *** 69.4 (55.9, 85.5) 14 (1, 64) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.3)
Crawford County 6 *** 69.9 (63.3, 77.0) 13 (1, 45) 89 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Washington County 6 *** 69.9 (65.7, 74.3) 12 (1, 31) 220 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
Wyoming County 6 *** 70.0 (58.8, 83.0) 11 (1, 58) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Blair County 6 *** 70.2 (64.8, 76.0) 10 (1, 38) 131 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Northumberland County 6 *** 70.3 (64.1, 76.9) 9 (1, 41) 100 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Luzerne County 6 *** 70.8 (67.4, 74.4) 8 (1, 25) 332 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Schuylkill County 6 *** 71.0 (65.9, 76.4) 7 (1, 33) 151 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Lawrence County 6 *** 71.3 (65.0, 78.1) 6 (1, 41) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Philadelphia County 6 *** 72.9 (71.0, 74.8) 5 (1, 15) 1,225 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Greene County 6 *** 72.9 (62.7, 84.5) 4 (1, 55) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Perry County 6 *** 73.1 (63.8, 83.6) 3 (1, 48) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 74.4 (69.1, 80.1) 2 (1, 24) 152 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Forest County 6 *** 79.8 (57.8, 110.6) 1 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/16/2021 2:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top