Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Pennsylvania 6 *** 62.6 (62.1, 63.2) N/A 10,903 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Juniata County 6 *** 56.5 (46.1, 68.9) 55 (4, 67) 21 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.0)
Montour County 6 *** 69.4 (55.9, 85.5) 14 (1, 64) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 61.6 (53.3, 71.0) 33 (2, 64) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.5)
Forest County 6 *** 79.8 (57.8, 110.6) 1 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.2)
Northumberland County 6 *** 70.3 (64.1, 76.9) 9 (1, 41) 100 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Washington County 6 *** 69.9 (65.7, 74.3) 12 (1, 31) 220 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
Sullivan County 6 *** 55.1 (37.3, 82.4) 57 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.5)
Lackawanna County 6 *** 66.8 (62.6, 71.1) 20 (5, 41) 204 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Luzerne County 6 *** 70.8 (67.4, 74.4) 8 (1, 25) 332 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Adams County 6 *** 64.1 (58.4, 70.3) 29 (4, 56) 96 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Blair County 6 *** 70.2 (64.8, 76.0) 10 (1, 38) 131 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Schuylkill County 6 *** 71.0 (65.9, 76.4) 7 (1, 33) 151 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Cambria County 6 *** 58.0 (53.4, 62.9) 49 (24, 62) 127 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Lawrence County 6 *** 71.3 (65.0, 78.1) 6 (1, 41) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Lycoming County 6 *** 66.1 (60.5, 72.2) 24 (3, 51) 107 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Fayette County 6 *** 74.4 (69.1, 80.1) 2 (1, 24) 152 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Fulton County 6 *** 68.6 (54.2, 86.4) 16 (1, 65) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 3.0)
Perry County 6 *** 73.1 (63.8, 83.6) 3 (1, 48) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
York County 6 *** 65.4 (62.4, 68.4) 26 (10, 41) 385 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Beaver County 6 *** 69.1 (64.6, 74.0) 15 (2, 37) 179 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Bedford County 6 *** 57.3 (50.1, 65.5) 52 (14, 66) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Huntingdon County 6 *** 56.7 (48.8, 65.7) 54 (11, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Mifflin County 6 *** 66.1 (57.9, 75.3) 25 (1, 58) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Wyoming County 6 *** 70.0 (58.8, 83.0) 11 (1, 58) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Berks County 6 *** 63.5 (60.4, 66.6) 30 (14, 47) 340 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Columbia County 6 *** 60.4 (53.5, 68.2) 40 (8, 63) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Mercer County 6 *** 59.3 (54.2, 64.9) 46 (17, 62) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Cameron County 6 *** 66.5 (43.5, 101.1) 21 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Clarion County 6 *** 60.5 (51.6, 70.8) 38 (3, 66) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Franklin County 6 *** 60.4 (55.9, 65.3) 41 (16, 59) 134 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Armstrong County 6 *** 59.7 (53.1, 66.9) 44 (9, 63) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Cumberland County 6 *** 54.2 (50.7, 57.9) 59 (41, 65) 183 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Crawford County 6 *** 69.9 (63.3, 77.0) 13 (1, 45) 89 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Greene County 6 *** 72.9 (62.7, 84.5) 4 (1, 55) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Northampton County 6 *** 61.6 (58.2, 65.1) 34 (19, 54) 262 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Somerset County 6 *** 53.7 (47.8, 60.1) 60 (31, 67) 64 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lehigh County 6 *** 61.8 (58.5, 65.1) 32 (20, 52) 284 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Wayne County 6 *** 57.7 (50.8, 65.6) 51 (12, 65) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 61.4 (58.5, 64.4) 35 (22, 52) 357 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Erie County 6 *** 64.3 (60.6, 68.2) 28 (10, 48) 235 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Susquehanna County 6 *** 54.8 (47.1, 63.6) 58 (17, 67) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Warren County 6 *** 59.4 (51.1, 68.8) 45 (5, 65) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Butler County 6 *** 60.5 (56.2, 65.0) 39 (18, 57) 158 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Lancaster County 6 *** 51.1 (48.8, 53.6) 63 (53, 65) 363 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Union County 6 *** 46.1 (38.6, 54.7) 66 (43, 67) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Clearfield County 6 *** 61.4 (55.2, 68.2) 36 (7, 61) 73 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
McKean County 6 *** 66.4 (57.3, 76.6) 22 (1, 60) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Allegheny County 6 *** 67.9 (66.1, 69.7) 17 (8, 28) 1,167 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Elk County 6 *** 63.0 (53.4, 74.2) 31 (1, 64) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Bradford County 6 *** 61.0 (54.1, 68.6) 37 (6, 62) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Bucks County 6 *** 58.6 (56.3, 60.9) 47 (32, 57) 512 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 67.7 (62.8, 72.9) 18 (2, 42) 149 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Pike County 6 *** 65.3 (57.8, 73.6) 27 (2, 58) 59 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Carbon County 6 *** 58.0 (51.3, 65.3) 50 (14, 65) 58 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Potter County 6 *** 55.8 (44.0, 70.3) 56 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Chester County 6 *** 51.9 (49.4, 54.6) 62 (51, 65) 331 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Indiana County 6 *** 46.7 (41.3, 52.6) 65 (52, 67) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Montgomery County 6 *** 52.2 (50.2, 54.2) 61 (52, 65) 573 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Philadelphia County 6 *** 72.9 (71.0, 74.8) 5 (1, 15) 1,225 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Snyder County 6 *** 47.4 (39.4, 56.6) 64 (36, 67) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Centre County 6 *** 45.1 (40.6, 49.9) 67 (58, 67) 76 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Venango County 6 *** 67.6 (59.8, 76.3) 19 (1, 55) 58 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Tioga County 6 *** 60.2 (51.9, 69.7) 43 (4, 65) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Clinton County 6 *** 60.4 (51.3, 70.8) 42 (3, 66) 32 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.1)
Dauphin County 6 *** 58.0 (54.4, 61.8) 48 (27, 60) 207 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.3)
Delaware County 6 *** 66.3 (63.5, 69.1) 23 (10, 37) 468 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.6, 0.4)
Lebanon County 6 *** 56.9 (52.2, 61.9) 53 (26, 64) 112 falling falling trend -6.9 (-12.5, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2022 1:55 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top