Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 *** 103.7 (102.7, 104.8) N/A 8,493 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.9, -2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Elk County 6 *** 146.1 (125.2, 170.1) 1 (1, 13) 36 falling falling trend -6.3 (-11.9, -0.4)
Philadelphia County 6 *** 137.8 (134.0, 141.7) 2 (1, 5) 1,031 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Sullivan County 6 *** 133.6 (93.6, 191.5) 3 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 3.8)
Jefferson County 6 *** 123.5 (106.8, 142.4) 4 (1, 32) 40 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
Mercer County 6 *** 121.4 (110.8, 132.8) 5 (2, 23) 100 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.1)
Northampton County 6 *** 120.8 (113.9, 128.0) 6 (2, 18) 237 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.7, -3.8)
Delaware County 6 *** 119.3 (113.9, 124.9) 7 (3, 18) 391 falling falling trend -6.7 (-10.2, -3.0)
Clearfield County 6 *** 116.0 (103.8, 129.4) 8 (2, 34) 68 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.8)
Bucks County 6 *** 115.2 (110.6, 120.0) 9 (4, 20) 497 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.8)
Armstrong County 6 *** 114.7 (101.6, 129.2) 10 (2, 39) 58 stable stable trend 5.4 (-1.2, 12.4)
Berks County 6 *** 113.9 (108.0, 120.1) 11 (4, 23) 290 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.9)
Montgomery County 6 *** 113.3 (109.1, 117.6) 12 (5, 22) 579 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.0, -3.8)
Butler County 6 *** 113.1 (104.7, 122.1) 13 (3, 29) 141 stable stable trend 3.8 (-7.2, 16.1)
Montour County 6 *** 112.1 (87.1, 143.0) 14 (1, 60) 14 falling falling trend -9.4 (-14.3, -4.2)
Lehigh County 6 *** 111.1 (104.8, 117.7) 15 (5, 28) 239 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.4)
Luzerne County 6 *** 110.1 (103.9, 116.7) 16 (6, 30) 238 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Tioga County 6 *** 108.4 (92.6, 126.5) 17 (3, 53) 35 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.5)
Venango County 6 *** 107.8 (93.9, 123.6) 18 (3, 50) 45 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Cameron County 6 *** 107.8 (67.5, 170.7) 19 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.1, 2.5)
Crawford County 6 *** 107.5 (96.1, 120.0) 20 (4, 45) 69 falling falling trend -6.8 (-8.9, -4.7)
Wyoming County 6 *** 107.2 (87.8, 130.4) 21 (1, 57) 23 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -2.8)
Erie County 6 *** 106.7 (99.8, 114.0) 22 (7, 37) 187 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.1)
Chester County 6 *** 104.9 (99.8, 110.2) 23 (12, 35) 335 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.4, -3.1)
Carbon County 6 *** 101.7 (89.3, 115.7) 24 (5, 54) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Somerset County 6 *** 101.7 (90.4, 114.4) 25 (4, 52) 60 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.4, -3.5)
Cambria County 6 *** 101.2 (92.4, 110.7) 26 (9, 49) 103 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -3.0)
Monroe County 6 *** 100.9 (92.4, 110.0) 27 (10, 49) 113 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.3, -3.0)
Potter County 6 *** 99.9 (77.7, 127.8) 28 (2, 64) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.2)
Adams County 6 *** 99.2 (89.0, 110.4) 29 (10, 53) 71 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.6)
Dauphin County 6 *** 99.2 (92.2, 106.5) 30 (16, 48) 163 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Washington County 6 *** 99.1 (91.9, 106.8) 31 (15, 49) 147 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.5)
Lawrence County 6 *** 99.1 (88.4, 110.9) 32 (8, 55) 65 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.2)
Schuylkill County 6 *** 98.2 (89.7, 107.3) 33 (14, 52) 103 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.8, 11.1)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 97.4 (92.2, 102.9) 34 (20, 47) 269 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.5)
Centre County 6 *** 96.8 (87.4, 106.9) 35 (14, 55) 81 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.1)
Warren County 6 *** 96.0 (81.2, 113.2) 36 (6, 61) 31 falling falling trend -8.9 (-12.4, -5.3)
Allegheny County 6 *** 95.5 (92.4, 98.7) 37 (25, 46) 750 falling falling trend -6.1 (-7.2, -4.9)
Columbia County 6 *** 95.2 (82.4, 109.6) 38 (9, 59) 42 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -2.3)
Bedford County 6 *** 94.2 (80.8, 109.4) 39 (9, 60) 36 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.0, -4.4)
Beaver County 6 *** 91.0 (83.4, 99.2) 40 (22, 57) 111 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Lebanon County 6 *** 90.9 (82.2, 100.3) 41 (21, 58) 83 stable stable trend 2.0 (-8.6, 13.9)
Union County 6 *** 90.9 (75.6, 108.5) 42 (8, 63) 26 falling falling trend -7.5 (-10.5, -4.3)
Susquehanna County 6 *** 90.9 (77.2, 106.8) 43 (11, 61) 33 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.8, -2.8)
Lancaster County 6 *** 90.6 (86.0, 95.4) 44 (30, 54) 299 stable stable trend 3.8 (-8.4, 17.7)
Blair County 6 *** 90.3 (81.4, 100.0) 45 (21, 59) 79 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
Northumberland County 6 *** 89.0 (79.2, 99.8) 46 (21, 60) 62 falling falling trend -8.0 (-10.4, -5.6)
McKean County 6 *** 89.0 (74.1, 106.3) 47 (11, 63) 26 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.8, 0.3)
Lycoming County 6 *** 88.3 (78.9, 98.6) 48 (23, 60) 68 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.7)
Huntingdon County 6 *** 86.7 (73.0, 102.6) 49 (16, 64) 29 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.1)
Wayne County 6 *** 86.7 (74.5, 100.7) 50 (19, 63) 38 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -0.8)
York County 6 *** 85.7 (80.8, 90.8) 51 (38, 58) 239 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.2, -4.3)
Bradford County 6 *** 85.1 (73.6, 98.2) 52 (23, 63) 40 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.1, -2.8)
Lackawanna County 6 *** 84.2 (77.4, 91.4) 53 (35, 61) 119 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.4, -1.6)
Clarion County 6 *** 83.8 (68.7, 101.6) 54 (17, 66) 23 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.6, -4.0)
Indiana County 6 *** 82.0 (71.7, 93.5) 55 (30, 64) 48 falling falling trend -7.5 (-10.0, -5.0)
Clinton County 6 *** 82.0 (66.8, 99.9) 56 (18, 66) 21 stable stable trend 9.6 (-16.4, 43.6)
Pike County 6 *** 80.5 (69.1, 93.6) 57 (28, 65) 37 stable stable trend 2.5 (-11.2, 18.2)
Fulton County 6 *** 77.1 (56.2, 104.6) 58 (12, 67) 9 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.0, 0.2)
Snyder County 6 *** 74.0 (60.0, 90.6) 59 (29, 67) 20 falling falling trend -9.6 (-14.1, -4.8)
Mifflin County 6 *** 71.7 (59.3, 86.3) 60 (36, 67) 24 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.4, -3.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 71.6 (64.1, 79.7) 61 (51, 66) 71 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.1, -4.4)
Cumberland County 6 *** 69.9 (64.1, 76.2) 62 (55, 66) 111 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.6, -4.0)
Forest County 6 *** 66.1 (40.5, 108.9) 63 (8, 67) 4 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.4, -0.3)
Perry County 6 *** 63.9 (52.0, 78.0) 64 (50, 67) 22 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.0, -3.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 62.8 (56.0, 70.2) 65 (58, 67) 64 falling falling trend -13.7 (-19.0, -8.1)
Greene County 6 *** 60.4 (47.1, 76.6) 66 (51, 67) 15 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.3, -3.9)
Juniata County 6 *** 54.6 (40.3, 73.2) 67 (54, 67) 10 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.8, -2.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/23/2021 7:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top