Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 109.2 (108.2, 110.2) N/A 9,701 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 6.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 132.2 (128.5, 135.9) 6 (2, 11) 1,059 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.3)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 104.5 (101.4, 107.7) 31 (21, 41) 896 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.1, 7.9)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 115.2 (111.2, 119.3) 14 (11, 26) 651 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.3)
Bucks County 6 Urban 134.7 (130.0, 139.6) 4 (1, 10) 645 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 6.3)
Delaware County 6 Urban 108.8 (103.9, 114.0) 23 (14, 38) 389 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.8, -3.5)
Chester County 6 Urban 107.4 (102.4, 112.5) 25 (15, 40) 374 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.1, -2.4)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 98.3 (93.8, 103.1) 40 (27, 52) 359 stable stable trend 1.2 (-9.6, 12.2)
Berks County 6 Urban 120.7 (114.8, 126.7) 12 (6, 22) 335 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 9.0)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 130.8 (124.1, 137.7) 7 (1, 14) 303 rising rising trend 6.0 (0.5, 13.4)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 124.7 (118.2, 131.5) 11 (4, 19) 287 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Northampton County 6 Urban 129.6 (122.8, 136.7) 8 (2, 14) 285 stable stable trend 8.2 (-1.0, 13.9)
York County 6 Urban 89.8 (85.1, 94.8) 53 (40, 59) 281 stable stable trend 2.6 (-7.6, 11.8)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 86.7 (81.9, 91.8) 56 (44, 61) 258 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 119.2 (112.2, 126.7) 13 (6, 27) 225 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 103.5 (96.7, 110.6) 34 (16, 50) 186 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 97.7 (91.0, 104.7) 44 (23, 55) 166 rising rising trend 13.0 (3.9, 22.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 99.9 (93.0, 107.3) 38 (19, 54) 162 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Monroe County 6 Rural 114.1 (105.7, 123.1) 16 (8, 36) 146 stable stable trend 8.8 (-2.9, 16.4)
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 125.5 (116.1, 135.6) 10 (2, 22) 137 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.0, 13.2)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 89.0 (82.3, 96.2) 54 (37, 61) 136 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)
Butler County 6 Urban 91.4 (84.3, 98.9) 51 (32, 61) 133 falling falling trend -7.6 (-17.5, -5.2)
Beaver County 6 Urban 98.1 (90.4, 106.4) 41 (20, 57) 127 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.7, 13.0)
Cambria County 6 Urban 109.3 (100.5, 118.7) 21 (11, 45) 121 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.1)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 103.9 (95.1, 113.4) 33 (14, 52) 106 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.2, 15.8)
Blair County 6 Urban 112.6 (102.8, 123.2) 18 (8, 42) 101 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.5)
Centre County 6 Urban 109.4 (99.6, 119.9) 20 (10, 47) 97 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Mercer County 6 Rural 106.4 (96.6, 117.0) 26 (11, 50) 92 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.3)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 99.2 (89.6, 109.7) 39 (16, 58) 83 stable stable trend 6.8 (-5.0, 15.7)
Franklin County 6 Urban 75.8 (68.5, 83.7) 61 (52, 67) 82 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.5, -3.5)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 108.6 (97.9, 120.3) 24 (8, 50) 79 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.2, 14.0)
Fayette County 6 Urban 73.5 (66.1, 81.6) 63 (55, 67) 76 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.9, -4.3)
Adams County 6 Urban 91.8 (82.5, 101.9) 50 (25, 62) 74 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Crawford County 6 Rural 104.8 (93.9, 116.9) 29 (11, 54) 70 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.0, 10.0)
Somerset County 6 Rural 113.9 (102.0, 127.0) 17 (4, 45) 70 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.3, 18.1)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 104.7 (93.6, 117.0) 30 (10, 54) 67 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 91.2 (81.3, 102.3) 52 (24, 63) 64 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.8)
Columbia County 6 Rural 138.2 (123.1, 155.0) 3 (1, 17) 63 rising rising trend 8.9 (2.3, 20.3)
Carbon County 6 Urban 104.9 (92.8, 118.4) 28 (9, 56) 57 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Bradford County 6 Rural 110.0 (97.1, 124.5) 19 (6, 52) 54 stable stable trend 4.9 (-2.4, 17.9)
Indiana County 6 Rural 83.9 (73.8, 95.2) 57 (36, 66) 52 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.7, 11.0)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 93.1 (81.7, 106.0) 47 (20, 62) 51 falling falling trend -6.3 (-12.1, -3.0)
Venango County 6 Rural 115.0 (100.8, 131.0) 15 (4, 51) 51 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Pike County 6 Rural 92.2 (80.8, 105.3) 49 (20, 64) 50 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.3, 13.0)
Bedford County 6 Rural 95.3 (82.1, 110.6) 46 (15, 63) 38 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.6, -4.3)
Union County 6 Rural 128.5 (110.4, 149.0) 9 (1, 39) 37 stable stable trend 8.3 (-11.7, 30.5)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 97.9 (83.8, 114.5) 43 (12, 62) 36 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.6)
Elk County 6 Rural 133.6 (114.2, 156.1) 5 (1, 32) 36 falling falling trend -4.7 (-15.7, -1.6)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 102.2 (87.5, 119.0) 36 (8, 60) 36 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.0, 18.1)
Warren County 6 Rural 102.9 (88.0, 120.2) 35 (8, 61) 35 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.6, 14.0)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 97.5 (83.2, 113.9) 45 (12, 62) 35 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.3)
Tioga County 6 Rural 100.5 (85.9, 117.4) 37 (10, 61) 35 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -1.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 74.1 (63.1, 86.8) 62 (48, 67) 35 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.4)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 98.1 (83.6, 114.7) 42 (11, 62) 34 rising rising trend 13.0 (2.1, 25.6)
Perry County 6 Urban 83.5 (69.9, 99.4) 58 (24, 67) 29 stable stable trend 7.6 (-14.3, 29.5)
Clinton County 6 Rural 105.0 (88.0, 124.7) 27 (4, 61) 28 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.7, 18.8)
Snyder County 6 Rural 92.3 (77.0, 110.0) 48 (14, 65) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.3)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 104.4 (86.4, 125.9) 32 (4, 61) 24 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.0, -0.9)
McKean County 6 Rural 72.3 (59.3, 87.8) 65 (46, 67) 23 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.5)
Montour County 6 Rural 150.6 (122.1, 184.6) 2 (1, 27) 20 rising rising trend 17.3 (0.4, 30.4)
Clarion County 6 Rural 71.3 (57.4, 88.0) 66 (43, 67) 19 falling falling trend -6.2 (-8.3, -4.5)
Greene County 6 Rural 61.6 (48.7, 77.3) 67 (57, 67) 17 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.1, -3.7)
Juniata County 6 Rural 72.7 (55.6, 94.1) 64 (31, 67) 13 stable stable trend 12.8 (-2.9, 36.8)
Potter County 6 Rural 83.0 (63.3, 108.5) 59 (13, 67) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.3)
Fulton County 6 Rural 87.3 (64.9, 116.4) 55 (8, 67) 10 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.6, 0.0)
Sullivan County 6 Rural 158.2 (115.2, 220.0) 1 (1, 49) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.2)
Forest County 6 Rural 81.5 (53.7, 159.6) 60 (1, 67) 6 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.8, -0.5)
Cameron County 6 Rural 109.2 (65.1, 178.2) 22 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.2, 2.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 3:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top