Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 *** 23.2 (22.9, 23.6) N/A 4,025 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.7 (19.6, 19.7) N/A 75,383 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Sullivan County 6 *** 32.7 (19.1, 56.5) 1 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Montour County 6 *** 30.4 (22.1, 41.3) 2 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.8, 3.7)
Columbia County 6 *** 29.9 (25.0, 35.6) 3 (1, 47) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.7)
Tioga County 6 *** 28.6 (23.0, 35.5) 4 (1, 55) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Lycoming County 6 *** 28.2 (24.5, 32.3) 5 (1, 44) 45 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lackawanna County 6 *** 28.0 (25.3, 30.8) 6 (1, 36) 86 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Carbon County 6 *** 27.4 (22.8, 32.7) 7 (1, 56) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Wayne County 6 *** 27.3 (22.5, 33.1) 8 (1, 58) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.2)
Crawford County 6 *** 26.5 (22.5, 31.1) 9 (1, 57) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Bucks County 6 *** 26.4 (24.9, 28.0) 10 (4, 34) 229 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Susquehanna County 6 *** 26.3 (21.1, 32.8) 11 (1, 62) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Adams County 6 *** 26.3 (22.7, 30.4) 12 (1, 55) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.9)
Warren County 6 *** 26.3 (20.9, 32.9) 13 (1, 63) 17 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.8, -1.9)
Perry County 6 *** 26.1 (20.6, 32.7) 14 (1, 63) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Beaver County 6 *** 26.0 (23.3, 29.1) 15 (2, 49) 69 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Schuylkill County 6 *** 26.0 (23.0, 29.4) 16 (2, 53) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Clarion County 6 *** 26.0 (20.2, 33.1) 17 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.1)
Northampton County 6 *** 25.9 (23.7, 28.3) 18 (3, 45) 108 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Monroe County 6 *** 25.8 (22.8, 29.2) 19 (2, 52) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Venango County 6 *** 25.7 (20.9, 31.5) 20 (1, 63) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.0)
Mercer County 6 *** 25.6 (22.3, 29.4) 21 (2, 56) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Indiana County 6 *** 25.4 (21.4, 29.9) 22 (2, 60) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Erie County 6 *** 25.1 (22.8, 27.6) 23 (5, 50) 91 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.2)
Lawrence County 6 *** 25.1 (21.4, 29.3) 24 (2, 59) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Lehigh County 6 *** 25.1 (23.0, 27.3) 25 (6, 50) 114 stable stable trend -8.3 (-17.6, 2.0)
Berks County 6 *** 25.0 (23.1, 27.0) 26 (7, 48) 135 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Clinton County 6 *** 24.9 (19.3, 31.8) 27 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.2)
Luzerne County 6 *** 24.9 (22.8, 27.1) 28 (6, 49) 116 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 24.8 (23.0, 26.8) 29 (8, 48) 145 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Mifflin County 6 *** 24.7 (19.8, 30.7) 30 (1, 64) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Lebanon County 6 *** 24.6 (21.6, 28.0) 31 (4, 57) 49 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Washington County 6 *** 24.5 (22.0, 27.1) 32 (6, 54) 77 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.7, 11.5)
Greene County 6 *** 24.3 (18.3, 31.7) 33 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.4)
Fulton County 6 *** 24.2 (16.0, 35.9) 34 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.4, 6.4)
Armstrong County 6 *** 23.9 (19.8, 28.7) 35 (2, 64) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 23.8 (18.8, 29.9) 36 (2, 65) 16 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Cambria County 6 *** 23.7 (20.8, 27.0) 37 (6, 61) 51 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.8, -1.3)
Bradford County 6 *** 23.7 (19.5, 28.6) 38 (3, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Potter County 6 *** 23.6 (16.4, 33.7) 39 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.5)
Huntingdon County 6 *** 23.3 (18.3, 29.4) 40 (2, 65) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Montgomery County 6 *** 23.2 (21.9, 24.5) 41 (24, 53) 255 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Somerset County 6 *** 23.0 (19.3, 27.4) 42 (5, 64) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Delaware County 6 *** 22.7 (21.1, 24.4) 43 (23, 57) 162 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Chester County 6 *** 22.6 (20.9, 24.4) 44 (22, 58) 142 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Bedford County 6 *** 22.6 (18.2, 27.9) 45 (3, 65) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1)
Butler County 6 *** 22.5 (19.9, 25.4) 46 (13, 62) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Dauphin County 6 *** 22.4 (20.2, 24.8) 47 (17, 61) 79 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Juniata County 6 *** 22.3 (15.9, 30.7) 48 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 6.7)
Allegheny County 6 *** 22.3 (21.2, 23.3) 49 (31, 56) 388 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.8, -2.7)
Blair County 6 *** 21.8 (18.9, 25.1) 50 (12, 64) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
York County 6 *** 21.7 (20.0, 23.6) 51 (27, 61) 123 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Elk County 6 *** 21.5 (15.8, 28.8) 52 (2, 65) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.3)
Cumberland County 6 *** 21.3 (19.1, 23.7) 53 (26, 63) 72 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Fayette County 6 *** 21.1 (18.3, 24.2) 54 (20, 65) 44 falling falling trend -8.7 (-14.2, -2.8)
Pike County 6 *** 21.0 (16.9, 25.9) 55 (8, 65) 19 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.0)
Northumberland County 6 *** 20.8 (17.6, 24.6) 56 (15, 65) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Franklin County 6 *** 20.8 (18.1, 23.8) 57 (23, 65) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Clearfield County 6 *** 19.9 (16.5, 24.0) 58 (18, 65) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
Wyoming County 6 *** 19.5 (13.9, 27.0) 59 (3, 65) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.5)
Snyder County 6 *** 19.4 (14.6, 25.6) 60 (6, 65) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Lancaster County 6 *** 19.3 (17.9, 20.8) 61 (47, 65) 140 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Philadelphia County 6 *** 19.3 (18.4, 20.3) 62 (51, 64) 320 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
McKean County 6 *** 19.2 (14.5, 25.2) 63 (10, 65) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.3)
Union County 6 *** 17.6 (13.2, 23.1) 64 (25, 65) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.6)
Centre County 6 *** 17.5 (14.8, 20.7) 65 (42, 65) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Cameron County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2021 8:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top