Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 19.2 (18.9, 19.5) N/A 3,287 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.5, -3.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Adams County 6 Urban 16.1 (13.3, 19.4) 57 (15, 64) 24 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.7)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 19.2 (18.3, 20.2) 34 (18, 48) 328 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 18.6 (14.8, 23.1) 41 (3, 63) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.3)
Beaver County 6 Urban 20.6 (18.0, 23.4) 21 (4, 53) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Berks County 6 Urban 22.0 (20.2, 23.9) 10 (3, 36) 116 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Blair County 6 Urban 23.5 (20.3, 27.2) 5 (1, 41) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Bucks County 6 Urban 19.6 (18.3, 21.0) 32 (12, 49) 177 falling falling trend -2.6 (-10.6, -0.7)
Butler County 6 Urban 18.1 (15.8, 20.6) 45 (12, 61) 50 falling falling trend -4.2 (-15.1, -1.6)
Cambria County 6 Urban 21.8 (18.9, 25.1) 11 (2, 50) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Carbon County 6 Urban 17.9 (14.0, 22.7) 47 (4, 64) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.4)
Centre County 6 Urban 18.0 (15.2, 21.3) 46 (9, 62) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
Chester County 6 Urban 17.8 (16.3, 19.3) 48 (23, 60) 115 falling falling trend -5.4 (-11.5, -2.3)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 19.0 (16.9, 21.2) 37 (10, 58) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 19.8 (17.8, 22.1) 28 (6, 54) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Delaware County 6 Urban 17.6 (16.1, 19.1) 50 (25, 60) 122 falling falling trend -14.5 (-23.5, -7.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 23.6 (21.3, 26.1) 4 (1, 30) 83 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Fayette County 6 Urban 18.1 (15.3, 21.3) 44 (9, 63) 34 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.8, -0.1)
Franklin County 6 Urban 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) 35 (6, 61) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 17.5 (15.4, 19.8) 52 (18, 62) 54 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.9)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 20.4 (18.9, 22.0) 22 (7, 45) 148 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 19.8 (16.3, 23.9) 30 (2, 60) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-12.4, -0.4)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 19.7 (16.9, 22.8) 31 (5, 59) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 18.3 (16.5, 20.2) 42 (16, 59) 85 falling falling trend -4.7 (-12.9, -1.6)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.7, 22.8) 19 (5, 47) 91 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 20.0 (17.0, 23.5) 24 (3, 59) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 19.8 (18.6, 21.0) 29 (12, 46) 219 falling falling trend -1.7 (-6.5, -0.4)
Northampton County 6 Urban 20.6 (18.6, 22.7) 20 (5, 50) 87 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 0.0)
Perry County 6 Urban 24.3 (19.0, 30.7) 2 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 16.8 (15.9, 17.7) 55 (40, 61) 283 falling falling trend -9.8 (-13.3, -6.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 20.4 (18.1, 22.9) 23 (4, 54) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 16.6 (15.0, 18.3) 56 (32, 62) 94 falling falling trend -12.0 (-23.6, -2.1)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 13.1 (8.7, 19.4) 64 (18, 64) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.0, 1.8)
York County 6 Urban 18.8 (17.3, 20.5) 40 (14, 56) 113 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Bedford County 6 Rural 17.3 (13.0, 22.7) 53 (3, 64) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.5)
Bradford County 6 Rural 19.9 (15.8, 24.9) 26 (2, 62) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Clarion County 6 Rural 19.6 (14.0, 26.8) 33 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.3, 2.9)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 18.2 (14.7, 22.3) 43 (5, 64) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Clinton County 6 Rural 20.0 (14.4, 27.0) 25 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.0)
Columbia County 6 Rural 23.0 (18.3, 28.5) 7 (1, 58) 19 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.4)
Crawford County 6 Rural 21.4 (17.7, 25.7) 14 (1, 58) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Elk County 6 Rural 15.8 (10.7, 22.6) 58 (3, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.0)
Fulton County 6 Rural 15.7 (8.7, 26.6) 59 (1, 64) 3 falling falling trend -23.7 (-51.1, -5.9)
Greene County 6 Rural 21.2 (15.4, 28.5) 16 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.3)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 17.7 (13.3, 23.4) 49 (2, 64) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.4)
Indiana County 6 Rural 15.5 (12.2, 19.4) 61 (16, 64) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 23.7 (18.4, 30.2) 3 (1, 58) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 4.9)
Juniata County 6 Rural 21.5 (15.1, 30.0) 13 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.4)
McKean County 6 Rural 13.1 (9.1, 18.5) 63 (19, 64) 8 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.8, -1.4)
Mercer County 6 Rural 17.5 (14.6, 20.8) 51 (10, 63) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 22.5 (17.5, 28.6) 9 (1, 60) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Monroe County 6 Rural 21.2 (18.4, 24.3) 15 (2, 52) 46 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.2, 9.6)
Montour County 6 Rural 30.1 (21.2, 42.0) 1 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.0, 5.3)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 22.6 (18.9, 26.8) 8 (1, 53) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Pike County 6 Rural 19.0 (15.0, 24.0) 36 (2, 63) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.3)
Potter County 6 Rural 19.0 (11.6, 29.8) 38 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 19.9 (17.1, 22.9) 27 (4, 59) 41 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Snyder County 6 Rural 21.5 (16.1, 28.3) 12 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Somerset County 6 Rural 20.9 (17.2, 25.1) 17 (1, 59) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.6)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 15.7 (11.0, 21.8) 60 (5, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.4, 4.5)
Tioga County 6 Rural 15.1 (10.9, 20.6) 62 (8, 64) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-15.3, 25.5)
Union County 6 Rural 18.9 (14.0, 25.0) 39 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.2)
Venango County 6 Rural 20.7 (16.1, 26.4) 18 (1, 62) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.0)
Warren County 6 Rural 23.0 (17.1, 30.3) 6 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Wayne County 6 Rural 17.1 (13.3, 21.9) 54 (5, 64) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Cameron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 9:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cameron, Forest, Sullivan

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top