Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 128.6 (126.8, 130.4) N/A 4,343 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) N/A 249,750 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Union County 6 152.4 (127.3, 181.4) 1 (1, 37) 30 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 6.5)
Richland County 6 147.3 (140.1, 154.7) 2 (1, 13) 337 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Clarendon County 6 147.1 (126.0, 171.3) 3 (1, 36) 41 rising rising trend 13.7 (1.9, 22.5)
Georgetown County 6 141.0 (125.3, 158.4) 4 (1, 34) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 1.7)
Newberry County 6 140.3 (119.9, 163.5) 5 (1, 41) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.7)
York County 6 140.3 (132.2, 148.8) 6 (2, 22) 234 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.2)
McCormick County 6 140.2 (95.8, 201.6) 7 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.0)
Chester County 6 138.8 (116.9, 163.8) 8 (1, 43) 32 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.2)
Charleston County 6 136.9 (130.4, 143.8) 9 (3, 24) 354 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 6.1)
Williamsburg County 6 136.2 (114.1, 161.8) 10 (1, 43) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.4)
Calhoun County 6 135.3 (103.8, 174.4) 11 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.8, 6.8)
Pickens County 6 134.8 (122.7, 147.8) 12 (2, 35) 101 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.0)
Saluda County 6 134.6 (106.0, 168.9) 13 (1, 46) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.8)
Florence County 6 134.3 (123.7, 145.7) 14 (2, 33) 126 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.3)
Chesterfield County 6 133.6 (115.0, 154.4) 15 (1, 43) 41 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.3)
Edgefield County 6 133.1 (108.6, 161.9) 16 (1, 45) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.7)
Greenville County 6 132.6 (126.9, 138.6) 17 (6, 28) 427 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.6)
Lexington County 6 131.8 (124.3, 139.6) 18 (5, 32) 246 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Hampton County 6 130.5 (102.2, 164.6) 19 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.7)
Lancaster County 6 128.9 (116.7, 142.2) 20 (3, 41) 92 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.8, 5.0)
Anderson County 6 127.3 (118.6, 136.5) 21 (7, 38) 173 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Dorchester County 6 126.9 (116.7, 137.8) 22 (6, 40) 121 falling falling trend -1.8 (-6.3, -0.1)
Spartanburg County 6 126.7 (119.6, 134.1) 23 (9, 37) 253 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Oconee County 6 126.1 (112.4, 141.1) 24 (3, 43) 76 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Dillon County 6 125.6 (103.4, 151.4) 25 (1, 46) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9)
Cherokee County 6 125.0 (108.6, 143.3) 26 (3, 45) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Marlboro County 6 122.7 (99.4, 150.1) 27 (1, 46) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.1)
Greenwood County 6 122.5 (108.3, 138.1) 28 (5, 44) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Beaufort County 6 122.1 (113.4, 131.4) 29 (12, 42) 188 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.2, -3.2)
Bamberg County 6 122.0 (93.4, 157.9) 30 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Lee County 6 120.6 (92.1, 155.6) 31 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.0)
Orangeburg County 6 120.4 (107.8, 134.1) 32 (8, 45) 76 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Berkeley County 6 120.1 (111.5, 129.2) 33 (14, 43) 154 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.9)
Kershaw County 6 119.7 (105.2, 135.7) 34 (6, 45) 55 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Fairfield County 6 119.5 (97.0, 146.4) 35 (2, 46) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Marion County 6 117.7 (97.2, 141.5) 36 (3, 46) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Jasper County 6 117.6 (96.1, 142.9) 37 (2, 46) 25 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 5.3)
Sumter County 6 116.8 (105.0, 129.6) 38 (13, 45) 78 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.1, 0.5)
Laurens County 6 116.3 (102.4, 131.8) 39 (9, 46) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Colleton County 6 115.2 (96.9, 136.2) 40 (5, 46) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.5)
Horry County 6 114.3 (108.0, 120.8) 41 (24, 44) 308 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.3)
Aiken County 6 110.2 (101.5, 119.4) 42 (26, 46) 135 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Barnwell County 6 107.1 (84.3, 134.7) 43 (5, 46) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.3)
Darlington County 6 106.3 (92.9, 121.3) 44 (20, 46) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Abbeville County 6 99.6 (78.2, 125.5) 45 (11, 46) 18 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.8, -0.7)
Allendale County 6 89.0 (57.2, 134.3) 46 (5, 46) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.6, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 6:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top