Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 133.7 (131.8, 135.5) N/A 4,476 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 129.8 (129.5, 130.0) N/A 258,398 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 110.9 (87.4, 139.1) 41 (4, 46) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-14.7, 1.2)
Aiken County 6 Urban 112.3 (103.5, 121.6) 40 (25, 45) 136 falling falling trend -3.4 (-11.2, -0.1)
Allendale County 6 Rural 85.7 (55.3, 130.2) 46 (12, 46) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.7, 0.5)
Anderson County 6 Urban 125.2 (116.5, 134.3) 28 (12, 40) 170 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 128.2 (98.2, 166.0) 24 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 124.0 (98.3, 154.9) 30 (1, 46) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.2)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 123.2 (114.3, 132.7) 33 (14, 42) 186 falling falling trend -8.9 (-11.1, -5.6)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 123.5 (114.8, 132.7) 31 (14, 41) 159 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 126.4 (95.1, 165.5) 26 (1, 46) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.2, 5.8)
Charleston County 6 Urban 147.2 (140.3, 154.3) 4 (1, 17) 377 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.9, 7.7)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 127.7 (111.0, 146.4) 25 (2, 44) 46 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Chester County 6 Urban 130.3 (109.0, 154.9) 23 (1, 45) 29 stable stable trend -10.8 (-26.2, 2.1)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 136.6 (117.3, 158.4) 13 (1, 42) 40 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.4)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 150.4 (127.9, 176.2) 1 (1, 37) 38 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.9)
Colleton County 6 Rural 108.9 (91.1, 129.3) 44 (13, 46) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Darlington County 6 Urban 117.3 (102.8, 133.4) 37 (11, 46) 52 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Dillon County 6 Rural 150.3 (124.7, 179.7) 2 (1, 39) 27 rising rising trend 8.7 (2.7, 19.6)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 136.8 (126.2, 148.2) 12 (2, 33) 128 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.7)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 132.3 (107.7, 161.4) 19 (1, 45) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.9)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 125.1 (101.0, 154.0) 29 (1, 46) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Florence County 6 Urban 138.3 (127.3, 149.9) 11 (1, 33) 128 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 135.5 (120.2, 152.4) 14 (1, 40) 76 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 1.2)
Greenville County 6 Urban 142.7 (136.8, 148.9) 7 (2, 20) 463 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 3.1)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 134.0 (118.8, 150.7) 16 (1, 41) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Hampton County 6 Rural 133.9 (103.9, 170.3) 17 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 5.9)
Horry County 6 Urban 123.3 (116.8, 130.2) 32 (17, 41) 335 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Jasper County 6 Urban 109.5 (88.5, 134.4) 43 (5, 46) 24 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 5.2)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 134.0 (118.4, 151.2) 15 (1, 41) 59 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.6)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 126.0 (113.8, 139.2) 27 (7, 43) 88 stable stable trend -11.9 (-23.8, 0.0)
Laurens County 6 Urban 107.4 (94.0, 122.4) 45 (22, 46) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Lee County 6 Rural 123.1 (93.9, 159.1) 34 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.4)
Lexington County 6 Urban 142.6 (134.8, 150.8) 8 (1, 22) 264 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Marion County 6 Rural 122.4 (100.7, 147.7) 35 (1, 46) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.2)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 110.3 (88.6, 136.2) 42 (6, 46) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
McCormick County 6 Rural 138.3 (95.4, 197.9) 10 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.7)
Newberry County 6 Rural 142.5 (121.6, 166.2) 9 (1, 40) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Oconee County 6 Rural 131.3 (117.2, 146.8) 22 (2, 42) 77 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 132.1 (118.6, 146.9) 20 (2, 40) 80 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.3)
Pickens County 6 Urban 131.7 (119.9, 144.4) 21 (3, 39) 101 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Richland County 6 Urban 149.1 (141.9, 156.5) 3 (1, 15) 342 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Saluda County 6 Urban 116.1 (90.0, 148.1) 39 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.9)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 132.8 (125.6, 140.4) 18 (8, 33) 270 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.5)
Sumter County 6 Urban 121.2 (109.1, 134.3) 36 (11, 44) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.4, 0.7)
Union County 6 Urban 145.1 (120.3, 173.7) 6 (1, 42) 28 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.7, 6.2)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 117.3 (96.9, 141.0) 38 (3, 46) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.3)
York County 6 Urban 146.0 (137.7, 154.7) 5 (1, 20) 243 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 4:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top