Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 430.8 (428.5, 433.2) N/A 28,303 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Greenville County 6 452.1 (444.5, 459.9) 10 (7, 20) 2,795 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Horry County 6 412.1 (403.8, 420.5) 37 (27, 41) 2,241 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.4, -2.0)
Charleston County 6 432.1 (423.7, 440.6) 23 (15, 33) 2,160 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Richland County 6 413.3 (404.5, 422.3) 36 (25, 40) 1,760 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Spartanburg County 6 451.5 (441.9, 461.4) 11 (7, 22) 1,735 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lexington County 6 426.8 (417.0, 436.7) 28 (16, 37) 1,526 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.6)
York County 6 449.3 (438.6, 460.2) 12 (7, 23) 1,406 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Anderson County 6 453.1 (441.3, 465.1) 9 (6, 22) 1,190 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Beaufort County 6 364.6 (354.2, 375.2) 45 (41, 46) 1,160 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.2, -3.7)
Berkeley County 6 421.4 (409.6, 433.4) 32 (18, 39) 1,038 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Aiken County 6 379.4 (367.8, 391.2) 43 (38, 46) 890 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.6, -3.1)
Dorchester County 6 425.4 (411.7, 439.5) 30 (15, 39) 768 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -1.5)
Florence County 6 438.8 (424.6, 453.4) 17 (9, 33) 766 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.8)
Pickens County 6 470.5 (454.6, 486.8) 8 (2, 17) 706 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Lancaster County 6 422.5 (406.6, 438.9) 31 (15, 40) 579 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Sumter County 6 429.3 (413.0, 446.1) 25 (10, 39) 553 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Oconee County 6 448.5 (430.6, 466.9) 14 (5, 31) 548 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Orangeburg County 6 434.7 (417.3, 452.7) 22 (9, 37) 522 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Georgetown County 6 478.8 (458.2, 500.2) 4 (1, 15) 512 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Laurens County 6 471.3 (450.7, 492.7) 7 (1, 20) 424 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Greenwood County 6 435.5 (416.1, 455.6) 21 (8, 38) 406 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 4.6)
Darlington County 6 417.0 (397.7, 437.1) 35 (14, 41) 382 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Kershaw County 6 411.5 (392.1, 431.7) 38 (17, 42) 366 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Cherokee County 6 492.8 (469.4, 517.1) 3 (1, 11) 354 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Colleton County 6 511.6 (483.4, 541.2) 1 (1, 8) 272 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 4.0)
Chesterfield County 6 430.2 (406.5, 455.0) 24 (7, 40) 266 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Clarendon County 6 425.9 (399.8, 453.5) 29 (7, 41) 228 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.6, 7.8)
Newberry County 6 421.1 (395.6, 447.9) 33 (9, 42) 223 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Williamsburg County 6 476.9 (447.1, 508.4) 5 (1, 23) 213 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Chester County 6 473.5 (444.0, 504.5) 6 (1, 26) 208 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Union County 6 498.8 (466.3, 533.2) 2 (1, 14) 195 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Marion County 6 441.3 (412.5, 471.8) 16 (4, 39) 192 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.8)
Dillon County 6 438.1 (408.2, 469.8) 18 (4, 41) 171 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Jasper County 6 375.5 (348.3, 404.5) 44 (32, 46) 159 falling falling trend -6.5 (-9.6, -2.6)
Marlboro County 6 448.8 (417.1, 482.5) 13 (2, 39) 158 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Abbeville County 6 428.6 (397.0, 462.2) 26 (5, 43) 155 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Fairfield County 6 383.9 (353.7, 416.4) 42 (24, 46) 137 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.4, -1.8)
Edgefield County 6 359.4 (331.8, 388.9) 46 (38, 46) 135 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.3)
Saluda County 6 419.3 (385.0, 456.1) 34 (7, 45) 120 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Barnwell County 6 392.6 (359.6, 428.0) 40 (16, 46) 113 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Lee County 6 437.2 (398.6, 478.9) 19 (2, 42) 103 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Hampton County 6 389.8 (355.3, 426.9) 41 (17, 46) 101 falling falling trend -2.3 (-8.1, -1.1)
Calhoun County 6 427.4 (387.6, 470.6) 27 (3, 44) 97 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Bamberg County 6 436.5 (395.7, 480.8) 20 (2, 44) 95 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
McCormick County 6 444.0 (397.6, 496.2) 15 (1, 43) 88 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Allendale County 6 394.9 (344.4, 451.4) 39 (5, 46) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/17/2024 2:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top