Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 *** 104.7 (103.1, 106.4) N/A 3,081 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) N/A 209,535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Edgefield County 6 *** 80.6 (62.3, 102.6) 46 (15, 46) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.5)
Beaufort County 6 *** 84.4 (76.1, 93.4) 45 (31, 46) 77 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Marlboro County 6 *** 86.3 (67.4, 108.7) 44 (8, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Allendale County 6 *** 89.1 (57.3, 132.3) 43 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.6)
Fairfield County 6 *** 90.7 (68.5, 117.9) 42 (2, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.1)
McCormick County 6 *** 92.6 (57.8, 142.0) 41 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Newberry County 6 *** 92.0 (74.5, 112.2) 40 (6, 46) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.7)
Calhoun County 6 *** 94.2 (66.1, 130.2) 39 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.2)
Clarendon County 6 *** 94.5 (75.2, 117.2) 38 (4, 46) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.4)
Barnwell County 6 *** 94.6 (71.4, 122.9) 37 (2, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Hampton County 6 *** 95.8 (72.7, 123.9) 36 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Darlington County 6 *** 95.9 (82.5, 110.8) 35 (8, 46) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Florence County 6 *** 95.5 (86.2, 105.4) 34 (14, 45) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Orangeburg County 6 *** 96.0 (83.6, 109.7) 33 (9, 45) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Horry County 6 *** 97.4 (91.0, 104.2) 32 (18, 43) 173 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Aiken County 6 *** 98.8 (90.0, 108.3) 31 (11, 43) 94 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Chester County 6 *** 99.8 (80.6, 122.3) 30 (2, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Greenwood County 6 *** 99.9 (86.5, 114.7) 29 (5, 45) 41 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.4)
Jasper County 6 *** 100.4 (79.6, 124.9) 28 (2, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.6)
Charleston County 6 *** 100.1 (94.4, 106.0) 27 (15, 40) 240 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Richland County 6 *** 101.5 (95.8, 107.3) 26 (13, 39) 247 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
York County 6 *** 103.6 (96.9, 110.7) 25 (9, 39) 177 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Lancaster County 6 *** 104.2 (92.4, 117.1) 24 (5, 42) 57 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Chesterfield County 6 *** 104.4 (88.1, 122.8) 23 (2, 45) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.3)
Dorchester County 6 *** 105.9 (97.0, 115.4) 22 (6, 39) 105 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Berkeley County 6 *** 106.3 (98.6, 114.5) 21 (7, 37) 140 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Williamsburg County 6 *** 106.9 (86.5, 130.6) 20 (1, 45) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Dillon County 6 *** 108.1 (87.2, 132.2) 19 (1, 45) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Kershaw County 6 *** 107.3 (92.8, 123.4) 18 (2, 43) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Greenville County 6 *** 107.7 (102.5, 113.0) 17 (8, 31) 336 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Laurens County 6 *** 108.9 (94.7, 124.6) 16 (2, 42) 43 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.3)
Lexington County 6 *** 109.5 (102.8, 116.6) 15 (5, 31) 197 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Sumter County 6 *** 109.8 (98.2, 122.3) 14 (3, 38) 67 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Marion County 6 *** 110.0 (88.9, 134.4) 13 (1, 44) 19 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.4, 2.2)
Lee County 6 *** 111.8 (84.0, 145.7) 12 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.3, 4.3)
Spartanburg County 6 *** 112.1 (105.3, 119.2) 11 (4, 29) 206 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Oconee County 6 *** 111.7 (97.7, 127.2) 10 (1, 39) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Cherokee County 6 *** 113.5 (97.9, 130.7) 9 (1, 39) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Abbeville County 6 *** 116.6 (91.9, 145.8) 8 (1, 44) 16 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 5.9)
Saluda County 6 *** 118.4 (91.9, 150.0) 7 (1, 45) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.4)
Anderson County 6 *** 119.4 (110.6, 128.7) 6 (1, 22) 139 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.8)
Pickens County 6 *** 121.7 (110.0, 134.3) 5 (1, 25) 81 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Union County 6 *** 122.3 (99.0, 149.5) 4 (1, 42) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Colleton County 6 *** 124.0 (103.4, 147.5) 3 (1, 38) 26 stable stable trend 14.3 (-3.4, 35.3)
Georgetown County 6 *** 126.4 (109.2, 145.5) 2 (1, 29) 39 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.6, 4.2)
Bamberg County 6 *** 127.4 (92.9, 170.0) 1 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/29/2022 1:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top