Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 1,853.7 (1,840.9, 1,866.7) N/A 16,425 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,944.4 (1,942.6, 1,946.1) N/A 971,828 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.1)
Abbeville County 6 1,720.0 (1,564.2, 1,887.2) 35 (8, 46) 91 falling falling trend -2.7 (-6.9, -1.4)
Aiken County 6 1,615.2 (1,553.4, 1,678.9) 42 (34, 46) 527 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.4)
Allendale County 6 1,571.9 (1,310.1, 1,871.0) 44 (7, 46) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Anderson County 6 1,931.7 (1,867.3, 1,997.7) 14 (4, 24) 694 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Bamberg County 6 1,937.1 (1,722.2, 2,171.5) 13 (1, 42) 60 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Barnwell County 6 1,673.6 (1,491.6, 1,871.8) 39 (8, 46) 64 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.6)
Beaufort County 6 1,648.7 (1,598.3, 1,700.4) 40 (33, 45) 830 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.0, -3.5)
Berkeley County 6 1,825.3 (1,755.3, 1,897.5) 23 (13, 36) 549 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Calhoun County 6 1,811.6 (1,608.3, 2,033.7) 25 (2, 46) 59 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.5)
Charleston County 6 1,908.6 (1,860.3, 1,957.8) 16 (7, 24) 1,241 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Cherokee County 6 2,074.5 (1,944.9, 2,210.5) 3 (1, 20) 197 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Chester County 6 1,979.6 (1,819.5, 2,150.1) 7 (1, 34) 116 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Chesterfield County 6 1,778.7 (1,650.2, 1,914.6) 30 (8, 44) 148 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Clarendon County 6 1,804.2 (1,672.4, 1,943.7) 28 (6, 43) 142 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.7, 0.7)
Colleton County 6 2,151.1 (2,002.6, 2,307.8) 1 (1, 15) 161 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Darlington County 6 1,708.2 (1,606.0, 1,815.2) 36 (20, 45) 215 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Dillon County 6 1,702.1 (1,543.8, 1,872.4) 37 (11, 46) 87 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Dorchester County 6 1,874.2 (1,792.0, 1,959.4) 17 (6, 34) 412 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -2.0)
Edgefield County 6 1,567.3 (1,415.9, 1,730.6) 45 (26, 46) 81 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.6)
Fairfield County 6 1,592.3 (1,433.1, 1,764.6) 43 (21, 46) 77 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Florence County 6 1,867.1 (1,788.1, 1,948.8) 18 (7, 34) 434 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -1.5)
Georgetown County 6 1,919.2 (1,825.3, 2,016.8) 15 (3, 31) 328 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Greenville County 6 1,993.9 (1,949.8, 2,038.8) 6 (2, 15) 1,593 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Greenwood County 6 1,866.8 (1,762.5, 1,975.8) 19 (5, 36) 243 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.3, -0.7)
Hampton County 6 1,549.5 (1,370.7, 1,745.3) 46 (22, 46) 56 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.9, -1.7)
Horry County 6 1,809.1 (1,765.5, 1,853.4) 26 (17, 35) 1,434 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.1, -1.9)
Jasper County 6 1,635.1 (1,484.6, 1,797.1) 41 (18, 46) 95 falling falling trend -4.7 (-12.6, -0.9)
Kershaw County 6 1,732.1 (1,627.0, 1,842.3) 34 (17, 44) 209 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.8)
Lancaster County 6 1,825.9 (1,741.6, 1,913.3) 22 (10, 38) 365 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Laurens County 6 1,970.6 (1,858.7, 2,087.4) 10 (1, 29) 238 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lee County 6 1,771.1 (1,565.9, 1,995.9) 31 (2, 46) 56 falling falling trend -3.0 (-10.3, -0.6)
Lexington County 6 1,858.9 (1,802.4, 1,916.9) 20 (11, 31) 846 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Marion County 6 1,813.2 (1,660.9, 1,975.9) 24 (4, 44) 109 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Marlboro County 6 1,845.1 (1,672.5, 2,030.9) 21 (2, 44) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
McCormick County 6 1,967.4 (1,748.1, 2,207.0) 11 (1, 41) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.2)
Newberry County 6 1,793.7 (1,658.3, 1,937.3) 29 (6, 43) 133 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Oconee County 6 1,976.8 (1,884.1, 2,072.9) 8 (2, 24) 352 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Orangeburg County 6 1,805.0 (1,714.7, 1,898.9) 27 (11, 39) 306 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Pickens County 6 2,007.2 (1,920.7, 2,096.7) 5 (1, 20) 410 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Richland County 6 1,756.9 (1,704.9, 1,810.0) 33 (22, 39) 909 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Saluda County 6 1,684.4 (1,508.7, 1,875.0) 38 (10, 46) 68 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Spartanburg County 6 1,940.2 (1,885.5, 1,996.2) 12 (5, 22) 976 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Sumter County 6 1,771.0 (1,682.6, 1,862.9) 32 (15, 41) 305 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.6, -1.1)
Union County 6 2,122.1 (1,950.8, 2,304.6) 2 (1, 21) 116 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Williamsburg County 6 1,976.0 (1,821.4, 2,140.4) 9 (1, 34) 125 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
York County 6 2,012.6 (1,947.9, 2,079.0) 4 (1, 16) 767 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/21/2024 2:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top