Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 477.0 (473.5, 480.6) N/A 14,728 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 350.4 (312.3, 392.5) 46 (43, 46) 66 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Jasper County 6 Urban 385.0 (345.5, 428.2) 45 (35, 46) 79 falling falling trend -18.4 (-25.6, -9.2)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 398.5 (383.3, 414.3) 44 (41, 46) 610 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.3, -2.1)
Saluda County 6 Urban 419.2 (370.0, 473.6) 43 (17, 46) 56 falling falling trend -14.2 (-26.7, -4.3)
Aiken County 6 Urban 429.7 (412.0, 448.1) 42 (33, 44) 476 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Richland County 6 Urban 438.5 (424.8, 452.6) 41 (32, 43) 846 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Hampton County 6 Rural 447.7 (394.2, 506.8) 40 (4, 45) 54 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Horry County 6 Urban 448.4 (436.1, 460.9) 39 (29, 42) 1,197 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 450.7 (427.1, 475.4) 38 (21, 43) 290 falling falling trend -9.1 (-13.6, -3.5)
Lexington County 6 Urban 455.9 (441.0, 471.2) 37 (25, 42) 762 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 457.1 (439.3, 475.5) 36 (23, 42) 540 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 463.2 (402.4, 531.6) 35 (1, 45) 47 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 463.5 (409.2, 523.3) 34 (2, 45) 58 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Newberry County 6 Rural 463.8 (425.2, 505.3) 33 (7, 43) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Darlington County 6 Urban 464.0 (433.3, 496.4) 32 (10, 43) 188 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 469.5 (433.0, 508.6) 31 (6, 43) 133 falling falling trend -8.2 (-13.6, -0.8)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 473.6 (426.8, 524.4) 30 (2, 43) 81 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 474.6 (412.7, 544.4) 29 (1, 45) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 474.7 (444.3, 506.9) 28 (7, 42) 197 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 476.6 (426.4, 531.9) 27 (2, 44) 78 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Charleston County 6 Urban 479.5 (466.6, 492.7) 26 (16, 35) 1,125 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 481.8 (434.0, 533.9) 25 (1, 43) 82 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 485.6 (458.5, 514.0) 24 (4, 38) 263 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 490.4 (468.4, 513.1) 23 (6, 35) 411 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 4.8)
Sumter County 6 Urban 496.9 (470.9, 524.1) 22 (3, 35) 290 falling falling trend -8.0 (-11.9, -3.9)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 497.7 (482.8, 512.9) 21 (6, 30) 914 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.9, -1.2)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 497.8 (456.2, 542.6) 20 (1, 41) 118 falling falling trend -2.2 (-9.4, -0.4)
Laurens County 6 Urban 502.9 (472.0, 535.5) 19 (2, 35) 214 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lee County 6 Rural 503.1 (442.4, 570.3) 18 (1, 43) 54 falling falling trend -12.8 (-25.2, -1.7)
Pickens County 6 Urban 503.8 (480.6, 528.0) 17 (3, 32) 374 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
McCormick County 6 Rural 504.8 (439.6, 580.6) 16 (1, 43) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
York County 6 Urban 505.4 (488.3, 522.9) 15 (4, 27) 732 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Anderson County 6 Urban 505.5 (487.3, 524.2) 14 (3, 28) 626 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Chester County 6 Urban 506.1 (461.9, 553.7) 13 (1, 40) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 506.9 (476.9, 538.5) 12 (2, 33) 266 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Oconee County 6 Rural 507.7 (481.1, 535.5) 11 (2, 32) 310 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Allendale County 6 Rural 507.8 (423.4, 605.2) 10 (1, 45) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 508.2 (477.4, 540.6) 9 (1, 33) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Marion County 6 Rural 512.2 (463.8, 564.6) 8 (1, 40) 94 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Florence County 6 Urban 517.6 (494.3, 541.7) 7 (2, 26) 404 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.4, -0.9)
Greenville County 6 Urban 519.1 (507.0, 531.3) 6 (2, 19) 1,501 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.5)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 519.4 (473.6, 568.6) 5 (1, 37) 105 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 521.9 (486.6, 559.2) 4 (1, 31) 177 falling falling trend -7.9 (-15.2, -1.3)
Union County 6 Urban 542.1 (492.6, 595.6) 3 (1, 31) 98 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Colleton County 6 Rural 543.1 (501.9, 587.0) 2 (1, 27) 143 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 4.3)
Dillon County 6 Rural 557.5 (505.9, 613.0) 1 (1, 28) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/07/2024 8:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top