Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 224.2 (222.3, 226.1) N/A 11,808 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 231.9 (204.4, 262.3) 20 (1, 43) 60 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Aiken County 6 Urban 199.7 (190.0, 209.8) 43 (36, 45) 360 falling falling trend -4.3 (-9.3, -1.0)
Allendale County 6 Rural 230.5 (187.0, 282.2) 24 (1, 46) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Anderson County 6 Urban 230.8 (221.2, 240.6) 22 (8, 36) 486 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -0.5)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 215.8 (181.0, 255.9) 37 (2, 46) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 1.8)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 217.3 (189.3, 248.5) 36 (3, 45) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 180.9 (171.4, 190.8) 45 (42, 46) 324 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 215.5 (206.8, 224.5) 38 (23, 42) 485 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.6, 0.5)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 222.9 (188.6, 262.3) 31 (1, 46) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.1)
Charleston County 6 Urban 219.9 (213.3, 226.7) 34 (21, 40) 918 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 250.1 (231.6, 269.7) 7 (1, 30) 148 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Chester County 6 Urban 252.6 (228.5, 278.7) 3 (1, 35) 91 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 237.7 (217.5, 259.4) 11 (2, 40) 113 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.2)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 235.2 (210.9, 261.7) 16 (1, 42) 82 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Colleton County 6 Rural 252.3 (229.8, 276.5) 4 (1, 34) 106 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Darlington County 6 Urban 235.4 (218.6, 253.3) 14 (3, 39) 163 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Dillon County 6 Rural 279.9 (252.5, 309.6) 1 (1, 15) 85 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 226.4 (216.0, 237.3) 29 (9, 39) 371 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 170.9 (149.2, 195.3) 46 (40, 46) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 223.0 (195.5, 253.8) 30 (2, 45) 59 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Florence County 6 Urban 233.2 (221.6, 245.2) 18 (5, 36) 330 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 255.6 (236.8, 275.5) 2 (1, 25) 173 stable stable trend -7.2 (-16.9, 1.1)
Greenville County 6 Urban 235.4 (229.3, 241.5) 15 (8, 28) 1,242 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 240.9 (224.1, 258.8) 9 (2, 37) 167 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Hampton County 6 Rural 222.2 (193.0, 254.9) 32 (2, 45) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Horry County 6 Urban 215.3 (208.2, 222.6) 39 (25, 42) 826 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Jasper County 6 Urban 181.7 (160.2, 205.5) 44 (34, 46) 61 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.4, -4.6)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 237.4 (220.7, 255.2) 12 (2, 39) 166 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 207.7 (194.7, 221.5) 41 (23, 44) 201 falling falling trend -10.9 (-15.9, -4.4)
Laurens County 6 Urban 230.7 (214.6, 247.7) 23 (4, 41) 171 falling falling trend -4.9 (-10.9, -0.9)
Lee County 6 Rural 233.3 (201.1, 269.5) 17 (1, 44) 43 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.2)
Lexington County 6 Urban 219.0 (211.4, 226.8) 35 (21, 41) 671 falling falling trend -3.7 (-8.0, -1.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 250.4 (225.0, 278.0) 6 (1, 37) 81 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 239.6 (214.4, 267.2) 10 (1, 41) 72 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
McCormick County 6 Rural 228.2 (186.2, 279.2) 26 (1, 46) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1)
Newberry County 6 Rural 227.0 (205.5, 250.3) 28 (2, 43) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Oconee County 6 Rural 229.4 (214.1, 245.6) 25 (5, 41) 200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 247.3 (231.7, 263.7) 8 (1, 29) 218 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Pickens County 6 Urban 236.9 (224.3, 250.1) 13 (4, 34) 291 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Richland County 6 Urban 213.3 (206.7, 220.1) 40 (27, 42) 834 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Saluda County 6 Urban 207.6 (179.4, 239.2) 42 (5, 46) 44 stable stable trend -9.8 (-18.8, 1.0)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 232.1 (224.6, 239.9) 19 (9, 32) 768 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.9, -0.7)
Sumter County 6 Urban 230.9 (217.4, 245.0) 21 (5, 39) 241 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Union County 6 Urban 251.5 (224.5, 281.1) 5 (1, 38) 73 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 228.1 (204.6, 253.7) 27 (2, 43) 78 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.8)
York County 6 Urban 220.9 (213.2, 228.9) 33 (19, 41) 640 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:02 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top