Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 476.6 (473.0, 480.2) N/A 14,617 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
York County 6 497.8 (480.9, 515.1) 19 (8, 30) 713 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -0.9)
Williamsburg County 6 589.8 (540.3, 643.0) 1 (1, 12) 116 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Union County 6 569.3 (518.9, 623.6) 2 (1, 21) 103 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Sumter County 6 497.6 (471.6, 524.7) 20 (6, 34) 290 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Spartanburg County 6 513.6 (498.4, 529.3) 13 (5, 23) 915 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Saluda County 6 462.8 (412.4, 518.1) 33 (5, 45) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Richland County 6 446.0 (432.1, 460.3) 40 (29, 43) 848 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Pickens County 6 513.7 (489.9, 538.5) 12 (4, 27) 368 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Orangeburg County 6 472.4 (445.9, 500.1) 28 (12, 41) 260 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Oconee County 6 505.9 (479.2, 533.9) 16 (4, 32) 302 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Newberry County 6 458.8 (420.5, 499.9) 37 (10, 44) 115 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
McCormick County 6 506.7 (441.6, 582.1) 15 (1, 44) 52 stable stable trend 5.4 (-0.2, 13.9)
Marlboro County 6 492.8 (444.2, 545.4) 22 (3, 43) 81 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Marion County 6 517.8 (470.4, 569.0) 9 (1, 39) 99 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Lexington County 6 446.7 (432.0, 461.8) 39 (28, 43) 745 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -0.9)
Lee County 6 553.3 (489.7, 623.3) 5 (1, 34) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Laurens County 6 529.0 (497.3, 562.4) 6 (2, 27) 223 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Lancaster County 6 474.0 (449.7, 499.3) 26 (13, 41) 305 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.6)
Kershaw County 6 461.2 (431.3, 492.7) 35 (13, 44) 192 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.5)
Jasper County 6 433.8 (392.1, 479.0) 42 (19, 46) 88 falling falling trend -9.3 (-14.7, -1.1)
Horry County 6 437.5 (425.4, 449.9) 41 (33, 44) 1,156 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.7, -2.3)
Hampton County 6 429.1 (376.9, 487.0) 43 (11, 46) 52 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Greenwood County 6 483.4 (453.7, 514.7) 23 (8, 40) 207 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Greenville County 6 504.3 (492.4, 516.5) 17 (8, 25) 1,436 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Georgetown County 6 524.1 (493.4, 556.4) 7 (2, 28) 267 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Florence County 6 511.8 (488.7, 535.9) 14 (4, 29) 396 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.8, -0.4)
Fairfield County 6 459.9 (411.7, 513.0) 36 (7, 45) 77 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Edgefield County 6 372.3 (333.0, 415.3) 46 (40, 46) 70 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.2)
Dorchester County 6 461.9 (440.6, 483.9) 34 (19, 42) 386 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Dillon County 6 520.7 (472.3, 572.9) 8 (1, 37) 91 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Darlington County 6 465.0 (435.1, 496.5) 32 (14, 44) 197 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Colleton County 6 566.0 (523.3, 611.5) 3 (1, 17) 144 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 3.6)
Clarendon County 6 470.1 (430.9, 512.3) 29 (7, 44) 118 falling falling trend -3.7 (-10.4, -1.3)
Chesterfield County 6 472.8 (436.8, 511.1) 27 (7, 43) 138 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Chester County 6 514.5 (470.0, 562.5) 11 (1, 39) 107 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Cherokee County 6 556.1 (519.8, 594.4) 4 (1, 19) 188 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Charleston County 6 478.0 (465.1, 491.2) 25 (18, 36) 1,108 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Calhoun County 6 481.8 (420.7, 550.2) 24 (2, 45) 50 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7)
Berkeley County 6 467.3 (449.1, 486.1) 30 (19, 40) 540 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.1)
Beaufort County 6 390.3 (375.6, 405.6) 45 (43, 46) 616 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.3)
Barnwell County 6 467.0 (413.9, 525.3) 31 (4, 45) 61 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Bamberg County 6 498.6 (435.6, 569.1) 18 (1, 44) 50 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Anderson County 6 516.5 (498.1, 535.4) 10 (4, 24) 633 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Allendale County 6 455.2 (377.1, 545.8) 38 (1, 46) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Aiken County 6 418.9 (401.3, 437.1) 44 (37, 45) 461 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Abbeville County 6 496.0 (447.6, 548.7) 21 (2, 43) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2024 4:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top