Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 397.4 (394.3, 400.5) N/A 13,686 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 416.4 (416.0, 416.8) N/A 835,074 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.1)
Colleton County 6 466.2 (428.9, 506.2) 1 (1, 14) 129 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Union County 6 448.4 (405.5, 495.0) 2 (1, 30) 92 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.2)
Cherokee County 6 447.6 (416.6, 480.4) 3 (1, 18) 166 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Pickens County 6 441.9 (420.1, 464.6) 4 (1, 15) 338 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Georgetown County 6 441.9 (414.1, 471.3) 5 (1, 20) 246 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.6)
Chester County 6 441.9 (402.5, 484.3) 6 (1, 30) 102 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Laurens County 6 426.6 (399.4, 455.3) 7 (1, 32) 202 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Marlboro County 6 423.5 (379.9, 471.1) 8 (1, 39) 77 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.6)
Greenville County 6 415.4 (405.4, 425.7) 9 (5, 22) 1,358 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5)
York County 6 414.6 (400.7, 429.0) 10 (5, 26) 693 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 0.3)
Lexington County 6 414.1 (400.8, 427.7) 11 (5, 25) 781 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Orangeburg County 6 406.8 (383.6, 431.2) 12 (4, 36) 262 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.4)
Anderson County 6 406.8 (391.2, 422.9) 13 (6, 31) 557 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Spartanburg County 6 406.1 (393.4, 419.1) 14 (7, 30) 820 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Oconee County 6 404.4 (380.0, 430.1) 15 (4, 37) 245 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Greenwood County 6 400.6 (374.9, 427.7) 16 (4, 39) 199 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.6, 8.2)
Williamsburg County 6 400.6 (362.9, 441.5) 17 (2, 42) 96 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Chesterfield County 6 400.3 (368.3, 434.6) 18 (3, 41) 128 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Charleston County 6 400.0 (388.8, 411.5) 19 (10, 32) 1,051 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
McCormick County 6 399.1 (326.9, 486.1) 20 (1, 46) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Dorchester County 6 398.5 (380.4, 417.3) 21 (7, 36) 382 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Newberry County 6 395.0 (360.4, 432.3) 22 (3, 43) 108 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Richland County 6 392.5 (380.9, 404.4) 23 (13, 36) 912 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Horry County 6 392.3 (380.9, 404.0) 24 (14, 36) 1,086 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.7, -0.4)
Saluda County 6 391.6 (343.6, 444.8) 25 (1, 46) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Marion County 6 391.1 (354.5, 430.8) 26 (3, 44) 94 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Clarendon County 6 390.2 (355.4, 427.9) 27 (4, 43) 110 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.8)
Florence County 6 388.8 (370.7, 407.7) 28 (10, 39) 370 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Bamberg County 6 386.0 (333.4, 445.6) 29 (1, 46) 45 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Berkeley County 6 385.3 (369.9, 401.2) 30 (14, 39) 498 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.2, 0.9)
Lancaster County 6 384.2 (362.9, 406.5) 31 (10, 41) 274 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.6)
Calhoun County 6 383.9 (332.1, 442.5) 32 (1, 46) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Darlington County 6 383.8 (358.1, 410.9) 33 (8, 42) 185 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Sumter County 6 382.6 (361.3, 404.9) 34 (11, 41) 263 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Dillon County 6 381.0 (342.8, 422.6) 35 (4, 45) 79 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Abbeville County 6 375.3 (333.8, 420.9) 36 (4, 46) 69 stable stable trend -5.0 (-17.4, 2.2)
Kershaw County 6 373.5 (347.8, 400.7) 37 (11, 44) 173 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Hampton County 6 365.2 (318.5, 417.4) 38 (5, 46) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Edgefield County 6 356.7 (316.4, 401.1) 39 (10, 46) 65 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Lee County 6 350.7 (302.2, 405.4) 40 (7, 46) 43 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.2)
Aiken County 6 349.6 (334.2, 365.7) 41 (33, 46) 429 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.9, -3.8)
Beaufort County 6 344.0 (329.4, 359.0) 42 (35, 46) 545 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.5, -3.4)
Allendale County 6 339.7 (276.3, 415.4) 43 (3, 46) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Barnwell County 6 338.0 (296.4, 384.2) 44 (17, 46) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.8)
Jasper County 6 331.3 (294.7, 371.5) 45 (26, 46) 71 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 2.1)
Fairfield County 6 324.0 (285.5, 367.0) 46 (27, 46) 60 falling falling trend -9.0 (-20.3, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/15/2024 7:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top