Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 405.9 (402.8, 409.1) N/A 13,898 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 421.1 (420.7, 421.5) N/A 856,144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Dillon County 6 Rural 450.1 (406.7, 496.9) 1 (1, 32) 87 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 447.5 (416.3, 480.6) 2 (1, 26) 163 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Colleton County 6 Rural 444.0 (407.8, 482.7) 3 (1, 30) 124 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 443.5 (415.9, 472.6) 4 (1, 26) 214 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.5, 10.4)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 440.4 (412.8, 469.7) 5 (1, 27) 249 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Greenville County 6 Urban 433.4 (423.1, 443.9) 6 (2, 17) 1,426 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Pickens County 6 Urban 429.5 (408.2, 451.6) 7 (1, 29) 338 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.0, 0.2)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 429.1 (404.8, 454.6) 8 (1, 31) 267 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Union County 6 Urban 425.7 (383.5, 471.7) 9 (1, 38) 86 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Chester County 6 Urban 424.2 (385.5, 466.1) 10 (1, 38) 97 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Lexington County 6 Urban 421.3 (407.9, 435.1) 11 (3, 27) 787 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 421.2 (402.5, 440.5) 12 (2, 30) 401 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
York County 6 Urban 418.6 (404.5, 433.0) 13 (4, 28) 699 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 0.3)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 418.0 (375.1, 464.9) 14 (1, 41) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Oconee County 6 Rural 416.0 (391.1, 442.2) 15 (2, 34) 249 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 414.8 (402.1, 427.9) 16 (6, 29) 856 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 413.7 (375.9, 454.7) 17 (1, 40) 107 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.8)
Marion County 6 Rural 413.6 (374.7, 455.9) 18 (1, 39) 93 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Charleston County 6 Urban 413.2 (401.8, 424.8) 19 (7, 29) 1,087 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Hampton County 6 Rural 412.4 (360.9, 469.8) 20 (1, 44) 52 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Darlington County 6 Urban 408.6 (381.5, 437.3) 21 (3, 38) 186 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.4)
Horry County 6 Urban 408.4 (396.7, 420.3) 22 (9, 32) 1,138 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Laurens County 6 Urban 406.8 (380.3, 434.8) 23 (3, 37) 192 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.5, -1.7)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 405.4 (378.3, 434.0) 24 (3, 38) 183 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Newberry County 6 Rural 403.9 (368.6, 442.0) 25 (1, 41) 109 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 403.8 (370.6, 439.4) 26 (2, 41) 121 stable stable trend -6.4 (-12.3, 0.4)
Anderson County 6 Urban 402.9 (387.4, 418.9) 27 (9, 35) 554 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Florence County 6 Urban 401.8 (383.3, 421.1) 28 (8, 36) 378 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
McCormick County 6 Rural 400.2 (329.0, 486.2) 29 (1, 46) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 397.0 (341.5, 460.1) 30 (1, 46) 44 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 393.8 (378.2, 409.8) 31 (15, 38) 510 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.3, 0.0)
Richland County 6 Urban 390.8 (379.2, 402.6) 32 (20, 37) 911 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.5)
Sumter County 6 Urban 381.2 (359.9, 403.4) 33 (16, 42) 262 falling falling trend -3.6 (-9.5, -0.4)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 378.1 (336.0, 424.4) 34 (3, 46) 69 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 375.0 (353.9, 397.2) 35 (21, 43) 264 falling falling trend -8.9 (-12.6, -4.2)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 360.4 (319.0, 406.3) 36 (10, 46) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 360.0 (324.4, 398.9) 37 (16, 46) 87 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 357.0 (314.7, 404.1) 38 (13, 46) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Aiken County 6 Urban 355.8 (340.1, 372.0) 39 (32, 45) 433 falling falling trend -4.4 (-9.3, -1.8)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 353.8 (310.1, 402.3) 40 (11, 46) 53 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Allendale County 6 Rural 350.8 (286.0, 428.4) 41 (2, 46) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 350.5 (335.6, 365.8) 42 (34, 45) 547 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.4, -4.2)
Lee County 6 Rural 346.6 (297.1, 402.7) 43 (9, 46) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 344.4 (294.0, 401.9) 44 (9, 46) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.0)
Saluda County 6 Urban 340.7 (294.8, 392.2) 45 (17, 46) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Jasper County 6 Urban 315.5 (279.5, 355.2) 46 (34, 46) 68 falling falling trend -12.4 (-20.6, -4.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 12:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top