Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 438.8 (436.0, 441.6) N/A 20,930 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR)ยง 1 461.9 (461.6, 462.3) N/A 1,273,624 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Colleton County 6 539.0 (502.1, 578.2) 1 (1, 7) 178 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 3.6)
Cherokee County 6 518.7 (491.7, 546.9) 2 (1, 8) 298 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Union County 6 506.0 (466.3, 548.5) 3 (1, 22) 137 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Laurens County 6 488.4 (463.8, 514.1) 4 (1, 20) 326 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Pickens County 6 477.0 (460.1, 494.4) 5 (3, 20) 653 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Marlboro County 6 471.0 (423.4, 523.2) 6 (1, 41) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Georgetown County 6 468.9 (444.4, 494.7) 7 (3, 29) 380 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Dillon County 6 466.7 (424.4, 512.5) 8 (1, 40) 99 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Spartanburg County 6 466.6 (455.3, 478.2) 9 (5, 22) 1,383 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Marion County 6 463.9 (419.3, 512.6) 10 (1, 42) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
York County 6 463.7 (451.5, 476.3) 11 (5, 23) 1,146 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Williamsburg County 6 463.3 (414.6, 517.0) 12 (1, 42) 78 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Oconee County 6 461.1 (441.7, 481.2) 13 (4, 29) 509 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Greenville County 6 460.9 (452.1, 469.9) 14 (7, 23) 2,228 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Anderson County 6 460.4 (447.3, 473.9) 15 (6, 26) 1,009 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Chester County 6 458.8 (423.0, 497.2) 16 (2, 39) 133 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Sumter County 6 458.2 (434.4, 483.0) 17 (4, 34) 298 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Lee County 6 455.3 (392.3, 527.5) 18 (1, 46) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
McCormick County 6 449.5 (380.3, 534.1) 19 (1, 46) 56 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Chesterfield County 6 447.3 (417.6, 478.9) 20 (4, 40) 185 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Greenwood County 6 444.1 (420.0, 469.3) 21 (6, 40) 292 stable stable trend -0.9 (-9.7, 2.3)
Saluda County 6 443.5 (399.3, 491.9) 22 (3, 44) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Clarendon County 6 443.1 (406.5, 482.7) 23 (3, 43) 133 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Allendale County 6 440.4 (336.5, 575.7) 24 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.6)
Orangeburg County 6 439.3 (411.4, 468.9) 25 (6, 42) 221 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Berkeley County 6 437.4 (423.1, 452.1) 26 (14, 38) 759 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.0)
Florence County 6 436.4 (418.0, 455.5) 27 (11, 40) 458 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.2, -0.3)
Charleston County 6 436.3 (426.2, 446.6) 28 (17, 36) 1,527 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.8)
Dorchester County 6 434.3 (418.0, 451.1) 29 (15, 39) 567 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Lancaster County 6 431.8 (413.4, 451.0) 30 (14, 41) 471 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Lexington County 6 431.1 (420.3, 442.1) 31 (19, 38) 1,300 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Darlington County 6 422.4 (397.5, 448.6) 32 (13, 44) 239 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Hampton County 6 420.4 (367.6, 479.6) 33 (3, 46) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Bamberg County 6 420.2 (359.8, 490.0) 34 (2, 46) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Kershaw County 6 417.7 (394.7, 441.9) 35 (17, 44) 269 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Richland County 6 416.7 (404.2, 429.6) 36 (25, 42) 895 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Horry County 6 416.3 (407.2, 425.6) 37 (28, 42) 1,976 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.6, -2.3)
Calhoun County 6 416.0 (364.3, 474.2) 38 (4, 46) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Jasper County 6 413.4 (373.0, 457.9) 39 (7, 46) 100 falling falling trend -10.2 (-14.5, -5.9)
Newberry County 6 411.5 (380.4, 444.8) 40 (14, 46) 153 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Barnwell County 6 411.5 (366.6, 460.9) 41 (6, 46) 69 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Fairfield County 6 405.7 (356.9, 460.7) 42 (6, 46) 66 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Abbeville County 6 394.6 (359.1, 433.1) 43 (20, 46) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Aiken County 6 388.9 (375.1, 403.1) 44 (37, 46) 691 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.2, -3.2)
Edgefield County 6 371.4 (335.9, 410.2) 45 (30, 46) 91 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Beaufort County 6 370.7 (358.4, 383.4) 46 (41, 46) 973 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.6, -3.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 6:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top