Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
South Carolina 6 *** 62.8 (62.0, 63.7) N/A 4,066 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Barnwell County 6 *** 68.9 (55.9, 84.4) 15 (1, 44) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.4, 4.3)
Dillon County 6 *** 79.4 (67.4, 93.2) 6 (1, 34) 32 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
McCormick County 6 *** 64.9 (49.8, 85.7) 30 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.4)
Sumter County 6 *** 71.9 (65.5, 78.8) 11 (3, 33) 94 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Greenwood County 6 *** 67.9 (60.5, 76.0) 20 (5, 39) 64 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Bamberg County 6 *** 70.9 (56.0, 89.3) 12 (1, 43) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.0)
Florence County 6 *** 66.1 (60.7, 71.8) 24 (9, 38) 117 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Marlboro County 6 *** 86.0 (72.6, 101.3) 1 (1, 25) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.8)
Oconee County 6 *** 66.7 (60.2, 73.8) 21 (7, 39) 83 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Williamsburg County 6 *** 68.4 (57.9, 80.5) 17 (2, 43) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Laurens County 6 *** 81.3 (73.1, 90.2) 4 (1, 18) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Cherokee County 6 *** 79.8 (70.7, 89.9) 5 (1, 24) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Orangeburg County 6 *** 57.7 (51.8, 64.2) 38 (20, 44) 73 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Union County 6 *** 83.6 (71.3, 97.7) 3 (1, 27) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Abbeville County 6 *** 65.9 (54.8, 78.9) 26 (4, 44) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Allendale County 6 *** 57.4 (39.7, 81.0) 39 (2, 46) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 3.9)
Lee County 6 *** 78.1 (63.0, 96.2) 8 (1, 40) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Calhoun County 6 *** 65.2 (51.5, 82.3) 28 (2, 45) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.6)
Marion County 6 *** 68.3 (57.5, 80.7) 18 (2, 42) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Clarendon County 6 *** 56.0 (47.3, 66.2) 41 (14, 45) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 1.9)
Darlington County 6 *** 70.6 (63.1, 78.8) 13 (4, 36) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Colleton County 6 *** 84.5 (73.9, 96.4) 2 (1, 21) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Kershaw County 6 *** 74.0 (66.1, 82.7) 10 (2, 32) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Pickens County 6 *** 65.9 (60.2, 72.1) 25 (9, 38) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Saluda County 6 *** 59.2 (47.5, 73.2) 35 (6, 45) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Georgetown County 6 *** 58.9 (52.4, 66.1) 36 (16, 44) 66 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Spartanburg County 6 *** 70.1 (66.3, 74.1) 14 (7, 29) 262 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Chesterfield County 6 *** 74.5 (65.1, 85.0) 9 (1, 35) 48 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Chester County 6 *** 79.4 (68.2, 92.1) 7 (1, 32) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Anderson County 6 *** 66.3 (61.9, 70.9) 23 (10, 36) 175 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Horry County 6 *** 66.5 (63.3, 69.9) 22 (12, 34) 345 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Lexington County 6 *** 63.5 (59.7, 67.5) 32 (15, 38) 220 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Charleston County 6 *** 58.6 (55.5, 61.9) 37 (28, 42) 280 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Lancaster County 6 *** 64.6 (58.5, 71.3) 31 (10, 40) 85 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
York County 6 *** 65.7 (61.5, 70.2) 27 (11, 36) 190 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Dorchester County 6 *** 65.1 (59.5, 71.0) 29 (10, 39) 109 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Greenville County 6 *** 55.7 (53.0, 58.5) 42 (33, 43) 331 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Aiken County 6 *** 50.9 (46.9, 55.3) 43 (36, 45) 120 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Richland County 6 *** 56.2 (52.8, 59.6) 40 (31, 44) 225 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Newberry County 6 *** 61.7 (52.2, 72.6) 33 (7, 44) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.4)
Beaufort County 6 *** 42.4 (39.2, 45.9) 45 (43, 46) 139 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.9)
Hampton County 6 *** 60.4 (47.7, 75.8) 34 (5, 46) 16 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.8, 0.1)
Edgefield County 6 *** 50.4 (40.6, 62.3) 44 (22, 46) 19 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.3, -1.0)
Jasper County 6 *** 42.0 (32.8, 53.1) 46 (36, 46) 16 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.2, -0.6)
Fairfield County 6 *** 68.4 (56.2, 83.0) 16 (1, 43) 23 stable stable trend -9.3 (-22.8, 6.6)
Berkeley County 6 *** 68.0 (63.1, 73.2) 19 (7, 34) 154 falling falling trend -10.7 (-17.8, -2.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2022 1:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top