Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 128.6 (126.8, 130.4) N/A 4,343 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) N/A 249,750 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Abbeville County 6 99.6 (78.2, 125.5) 45 (11, 46) 18 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.8, -0.7)
Aiken County 6 110.2 (101.5, 119.4) 42 (26, 46) 135 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Allendale County 6 89.0 (57.2, 134.3) 46 (5, 46) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.6, 0.9)
Anderson County 6 127.3 (118.6, 136.5) 21 (7, 38) 173 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Bamberg County 6 122.0 (93.4, 157.9) 30 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Barnwell County 6 107.1 (84.3, 134.7) 43 (5, 46) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.3)
Beaufort County 6 122.1 (113.4, 131.4) 29 (12, 42) 188 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.2, -3.2)
Berkeley County 6 120.1 (111.5, 129.2) 33 (14, 43) 154 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.9)
Calhoun County 6 135.3 (103.8, 174.4) 11 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.8, 6.8)
Charleston County 6 136.9 (130.4, 143.8) 9 (3, 24) 354 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 6.1)
Cherokee County 6 125.0 (108.6, 143.3) 26 (3, 45) 45 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Chester County 6 138.8 (116.9, 163.8) 8 (1, 43) 32 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.2)
Chesterfield County 6 133.6 (115.0, 154.4) 15 (1, 43) 41 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.3)
Clarendon County 6 147.1 (126.0, 171.3) 3 (1, 36) 41 rising rising trend 13.7 (1.9, 22.5)
Colleton County 6 115.2 (96.9, 136.2) 40 (5, 46) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.5)
Darlington County 6 106.3 (92.9, 121.3) 44 (20, 46) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Dillon County 6 125.6 (103.4, 151.4) 25 (1, 46) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9)
Dorchester County 6 126.9 (116.7, 137.8) 22 (6, 40) 121 falling falling trend -1.8 (-6.3, -0.1)
Edgefield County 6 133.1 (108.6, 161.9) 16 (1, 45) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.7)
Fairfield County 6 119.5 (97.0, 146.4) 35 (2, 46) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Florence County 6 134.3 (123.7, 145.7) 14 (2, 33) 126 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.3)
Georgetown County 6 141.0 (125.3, 158.4) 4 (1, 34) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 1.7)
Greenville County 6 132.6 (126.9, 138.6) 17 (6, 28) 427 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.6)
Greenwood County 6 122.5 (108.3, 138.1) 28 (5, 44) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Hampton County 6 130.5 (102.2, 164.6) 19 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.7)
Horry County 6 114.3 (108.0, 120.8) 41 (24, 44) 308 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.3)
Jasper County 6 117.6 (96.1, 142.9) 37 (2, 46) 25 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 5.3)
Kershaw County 6 119.7 (105.2, 135.7) 34 (6, 45) 55 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Lancaster County 6 128.9 (116.7, 142.2) 20 (3, 41) 92 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.8, 5.0)
Laurens County 6 116.3 (102.4, 131.8) 39 (9, 46) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Lee County 6 120.6 (92.1, 155.6) 31 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 4.0)
Lexington County 6 131.8 (124.3, 139.6) 18 (5, 32) 246 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Marion County 6 117.7 (97.2, 141.5) 36 (3, 46) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Marlboro County 6 122.7 (99.4, 150.1) 27 (1, 46) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.1)
McCormick County 6 140.2 (95.8, 201.6) 7 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.0)
Newberry County 6 140.3 (119.9, 163.5) 5 (1, 41) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.7)
Oconee County 6 126.1 (112.4, 141.1) 24 (3, 43) 76 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Orangeburg County 6 120.4 (107.8, 134.1) 32 (8, 45) 76 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Pickens County 6 134.8 (122.7, 147.8) 12 (2, 35) 101 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.0)
Richland County 6 147.3 (140.1, 154.7) 2 (1, 13) 337 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Saluda County 6 134.6 (106.0, 168.9) 13 (1, 46) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.8)
Spartanburg County 6 126.7 (119.6, 134.1) 23 (9, 37) 253 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Sumter County 6 116.8 (105.0, 129.6) 38 (13, 45) 78 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.1, 0.5)
Union County 6 152.4 (127.3, 181.4) 1 (1, 37) 30 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 6.5)
Williamsburg County 6 136.2 (114.1, 161.8) 10 (1, 43) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.4)
York County 6 140.3 (132.2, 148.8) 6 (2, 22) 234 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 3:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top