Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 23.8 (23.1, 24.6) N/A 853 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.8 (27.7, 27.9) N/A 58,425 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 27.1 (16.6, 42.3) 14 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Allendale County 6 Rural 55.7 (31.7, 94.2) 1 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Bamberg County 6 Rural 33.6 (19.8, 55.3) 6 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Barnwell County 6 Rural 30.7 (18.8, 47.8) 8 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.5, 9.7)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 27.1 (19.6, 36.7) 13 (3, 42) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 5.1)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 20.0 (13.0, 29.6) 40 (6, 44) 6
*
*
Clarendon County 6 Rural 18.0 (11.4, 27.9) 43 (9, 44) 5 falling falling trend -7.8 (-24.3, -1.4)
Colleton County 6 Rural 29.6 (20.8, 41.2) 10 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.5, 7.0)
Dillon County 6 Rural 29.9 (20.2, 43.2) 9 (1, 43) 6
*
*
Georgetown County 6 Rural 23.0 (17.6, 29.9) 26 (7, 44) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.7)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 21.2 (15.6, 28.4) 35 (8, 44) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 6.0)
Hampton County 6 Rural 37.2 (23.3, 57.3) 4 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.8, 8.2)
Lee County 6 Rural 26.1 (15.2, 43.5) 17 (2, 44) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.9, 7.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 22.8 (14.9, 34.1) 28 (4, 44) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.0)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 37.4 (25.4, 53.7) 3 (1, 37) 7 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.8, 11.4)
McCormick County 6 Rural 37.7 (20.0, 72.8) 2 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Newberry County 6 Rural 33.2 (23.4, 45.9) 7 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.6, 11.7)
Oconee County 6 Rural 19.1 (14.5, 25.0) 42 (14, 44) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.3)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 35.5 (29.0, 43.3) 5 (1, 18) 23 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.2, 3.7)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 28.0 (18.9, 40.6) 12 (2, 44) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 5.8)
Aiken County 6 Urban 22.4 (18.7, 26.8) 31 (11, 43) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.5)
Anderson County 6 Urban 22.9 (19.4, 27.0) 27 (10, 41) 32 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.6)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 20.7 (17.3, 24.6) 38 (14, 43) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.3)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 20.4 (17.1, 24.2) 39 (16, 44) 28 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.4)
Charleston County 6 Urban 21.7 (19.2, 24.4) 33 (16, 42) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Chester County 6 Urban 22.2 (14.3, 33.3) 32 (4, 44) 5 stable stable trend -30.1 (-60.0, 8.0)
Darlington County 6 Urban 25.5 (19.4, 33.2) 18 (4, 42) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.2, 5.1)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 21.6 (17.7, 26.1) 34 (12, 43) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 5.7)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 20.9 (12.3, 34.2) 37 (4, 44) 4
*
*
Fairfield County 6 Urban 26.6 (15.2, 43.8) 15 (1, 44) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.7)
Florence County 6 Urban 25.3 (20.8, 30.6) 19 (6, 40) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.8)
Greenville County 6 Urban 24.0 (21.6, 26.5) 22 (11, 36) 81 rising rising trend 6.6 (0.1, 11.0)
Horry County 6 Urban 26.3 (23.5, 29.3) 16 (7, 31) 78 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.3)
Jasper County 6 Urban 23.2 (14.9, 35.5) 24 (3, 44) 6
*
*
Kershaw County 6 Urban 25.2 (19.2, 32.8) 20 (5, 43) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 22.6 (17.7, 28.5) 30 (8, 44) 16 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.3, 9.0)
Laurens County 6 Urban 15.5 (10.8, 21.8) 44 (22, 44) 7 falling falling trend -7.7 (-24.8, -0.1)
Lexington County 6 Urban 23.1 (20.1, 26.5) 25 (10, 41) 44 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.9)
Pickens County 6 Urban 19.6 (15.4, 24.7) 41 (15, 44) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.7)
Richland County 6 Urban 24.4 (21.7, 27.5) 21 (10, 37) 60 stable stable trend -8.1 (-15.7, 1.1)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 23.2 (20.3, 26.5) 23 (11, 40) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Sumter County 6 Urban 29.1 (23.5, 35.7) 11 (3, 34) 20 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 5.8)
Union County 6 Urban 20.9 (12.8, 32.9) 36 (4, 44) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.2)
York County 6 Urban 22.7 (19.6, 26.1) 29 (12, 41) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.9, 1.0)
Calhoun County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saluda County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 5:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top