Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 111.7 (110.1, 113.4) N/A 3,760 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.2, 3.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 95.7 (76.6, 119.0) 37 (8, 46) 18 rising rising trend 8.0 (2.3, 17.1)
Allendale County 6 Rural 184.0 (136.0, 245.0) 1 (1, 27) 10 rising rising trend 14.7 (3.0, 37.2)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 119.6 (91.7, 155.3) 15 (2, 45) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -2.0)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 92.3 (70.2, 119.7) 39 (7, 46) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.7)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 102.7 (88.2, 119.2) 32 (10, 44) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 101.1 (85.3, 119.4) 33 (9, 45) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.7)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 120.4 (102.1, 141.8) 13 (3, 39) 32 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Colleton County 6 Rural 111.5 (94.6, 131.1) 25 (4, 43) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 5.5)
Dillon County 6 Rural 80.8 (62.6, 103.0) 45 (20, 46) 14 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -2.1)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 112.2 (99.2, 126.8) 22 (5, 40) 63 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.4, -2.8)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 98.3 (85.5, 112.6) 35 (16, 45) 44 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Hampton County 6 Rural 123.9 (97.0, 156.4) 12 (1, 44) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.7)
Lee County 6 Rural 147.8 (116.9, 185.1) 3 (1, 34) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.9, 1.0)
Marion County 6 Rural 108.5 (87.7, 133.2) 27 (4, 45) 21 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.2, -2.3)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 99.4 (79.7, 123.0) 34 (6, 46) 18 falling falling trend -10.2 (-26.5, -5.8)
McCormick County 6 Rural 135.1 (104.8, 176.6) 4 (1, 40) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.8)
Newberry County 6 Rural 91.3 (75.4, 109.9) 42 (16, 46) 25 stable stable trend 9.1 (-4.9, 25.7)
Oconee County 6 Rural 114.0 (102.6, 126.5) 21 (6, 37) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.2)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 128.7 (115.7, 143.1) 8 (2, 27) 76 stable stable trend 8.5 (-15.1, 21.9)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 169.0 (144.6, 196.9) 2 (1, 8) 37 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Aiken County 6 Urban 109.6 (101.3, 118.6) 26 (12, 38) 133 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 9.8)
Anderson County 6 Urban 111.6 (103.6, 120.1) 24 (11, 36) 151 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 9.9)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 104.7 (97.5, 112.3) 31 (17, 40) 175 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.5)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 106.3 (98.2, 115.0) 29 (15, 40) 136 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 7.6)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 86.0 (63.5, 115.9) 43 (10, 46) 10 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.6, -2.9)
Charleston County 6 Urban 128.7 (122.4, 135.3) 9 (3, 17) 331 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 7.5)
Chester County 6 Urban 119.8 (99.9, 142.8) 14 (3, 41) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.9)
Darlington County 6 Urban 114.0 (99.6, 130.2) 20 (4, 40) 49 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 116.2 (106.3, 126.8) 18 (6, 34) 108 rising rising trend 9.9 (0.7, 17.1)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 91.4 (73.3, 113.3) 41 (12, 46) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 1.1)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 134.5 (110.4, 163.5) 5 (1, 37) 24 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.5)
Florence County 6 Urban 130.2 (119.0, 142.1) 6 (2, 21) 108 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 6.5)
Greenville County 6 Urban 124.1 (118.5, 129.9) 11 (5, 20) 388 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 7.5)
Horry County 6 Urban 78.9 (74.2, 83.9) 46 (40, 46) 238 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.4, -2.7)
Jasper County 6 Urban 111.6 (92.3, 134.5) 23 (3, 44) 26 stable stable trend -21.5 (-37.8, 0.0)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 118.2 (104.0, 134.0) 16 (4, 37) 53 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.6)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 107.5 (96.6, 119.5) 28 (11, 41) 74 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Laurens County 6 Urban 91.8 (79.6, 105.5) 40 (23, 46) 43 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.2, -1.9)
Lexington County 6 Urban 97.8 (91.3, 104.7) 36 (25, 43) 178 stable stable trend 7.0 (-7.9, 16.0)
Pickens County 6 Urban 105.3 (95.3, 116.2) 30 (13, 41) 84 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.8, 13.1)
Richland County 6 Urban 117.1 (110.4, 124.2) 17 (8, 29) 243 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Saluda County 6 Urban 82.5 (62.3, 108.1) 44 (16, 46) 12 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.5, -1.4)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 114.1 (107.4, 121.2) 19 (10, 33) 227 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.5)
Sumter County 6 Urban 127.7 (115.2, 141.3) 10 (3, 27) 80 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.6, -0.8)
Union County 6 Urban 93.5 (75.1, 115.7) 38 (10, 46) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
York County 6 Urban 130.1 (122.0, 138.7) 7 (3, 17) 205 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 2:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top