Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 109.8 (108.2, 111.5) N/A 3,659 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Williamsburg County 6 177.6 (152.3, 206.4) 1 (1, 5) 38 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Lee County 6 156.0 (124.4, 194.0) 2 (1, 27) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
McCormick County 6 145.5 (114.0, 187.8) 3 (1, 37) 16 rising rising trend 18.2 (0.3, 49.2)
Allendale County 6 135.5 (96.0, 187.4) 4 (1, 45) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Jasper County 6 132.2 (110.8, 157.1) 5 (1, 34) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 2.6)
Sumter County 6 131.7 (118.9, 145.5) 6 (2, 22) 82 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.3)
Florence County 6 128.5 (117.4, 140.5) 7 (3, 23) 105 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 7.4)
Charleston County 6 125.6 (119.4, 132.2) 8 (4, 19) 319 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.4, 6.6)
Orangeburg County 6 125.4 (112.5, 139.6) 9 (2, 29) 74 stable stable trend 8.5 (-6.3, 18.9)
Chester County 6 125.3 (104.5, 149.4) 10 (2, 39) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.7)
Bamberg County 6 124.6 (95.7, 161.2) 11 (1, 44) 13 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -2.1)
Darlington County 6 122.8 (108.3, 138.8) 12 (2, 35) 56 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.7, 0.1)
York County 6 120.7 (112.9, 129.0) 13 (5, 27) 188 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Fairfield County 6 118.8 (96.7, 145.5) 14 (2, 42) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.0)
Richland County 6 118.2 (111.4, 125.4) 15 (6, 28) 239 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Spartanburg County 6 117.9 (111.0, 125.2) 16 (7, 28) 227 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Lancaster County 6 117.0 (105.6, 129.5) 17 (4, 35) 80 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Greenville County 6 115.7 (110.2, 121.3) 18 (9, 28) 356 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 7.7)
Georgetown County 6 115.2 (101.7, 130.2) 19 (4, 38) 63 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.5)
Marlboro County 6 114.4 (92.3, 140.7) 20 (2, 44) 20 falling falling trend -9.7 (-23.6, -4.4)
Colleton County 6 113.7 (96.4, 133.6) 21 (3, 42) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 7.1)
Cherokee County 6 113.0 (97.5, 130.4) 22 (4, 41) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Anderson County 6 112.2 (104.1, 120.8) 23 (9, 35) 149 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 11.1)
Oconee County 6 110.7 (99.3, 123.3) 24 (7, 40) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.5)
Kershaw County 6 108.0 (94.5, 123.0) 25 (6, 42) 49 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Union County 6 106.3 (87.0, 129.3) 26 (4, 45) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.8)
Chesterfield County 6 106.3 (90.2, 124.6) 27 (6, 44) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Berkeley County 6 105.9 (97.7, 114.6) 28 (15, 39) 132 stable stable trend 4.3 (-2.4, 9.0)
Dorchester County 6 105.3 (95.9, 115.5) 29 (13, 41) 97 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.5)
Beaufort County 6 104.8 (97.7, 112.4) 30 (17, 39) 179 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.7)
Marion County 6 104.7 (85.0, 128.1) 31 (4, 46) 22 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.7, -2.6)
Clarendon County 6 104.5 (87.9, 124.0) 32 (6, 45) 29 falling falling trend -6.2 (-19.8, -2.0)
Aiken County 6 101.6 (93.5, 110.2) 33 (18, 42) 123 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 12.0)
Pickens County 6 100.3 (90.3, 111.1) 34 (17, 43) 77 rising rising trend 8.6 (3.3, 16.3)
Hampton County 6 99.9 (76.0, 129.5) 35 (4, 46) 13 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -2.2)
Saluda County 6 97.2 (75.5, 124.0) 36 (5, 46) 14 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.7, -1.5)
Greenwood County 6 97.1 (84.6, 111.2) 37 (15, 45) 44 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.1)
Barnwell County 6 94.6 (72.7, 121.6) 38 (6, 46) 13 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.9, -2.3)
Laurens County 6 94.0 (81.6, 107.9) 39 (20, 45) 44 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.5, -2.2)
Edgefield County 6 90.9 (72.8, 112.7) 40 (13, 46) 18 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.4)
Lexington County 6 90.6 (84.3, 97.1) 41 (32, 45) 166 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.5)
Abbeville County 6 89.6 (71.1, 112.3) 42 (13, 46) 17 stable stable trend 12.6 (-6.5, 35.3)
Calhoun County 6 87.5 (65.0, 117.1) 43 (10, 46) 11 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.7, -2.6)
Dillon County 6 80.9 (63.2, 102.4) 44 (23, 46) 15 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.5, -1.7)
Horry County 6 79.9 (75.1, 84.9) 45 (40, 46) 236 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.9, -2.4)
Newberry County 6 75.6 (61.5, 92.4) 46 (34, 46) 21 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/22/2024 7:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top