Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota 6 *** 459.1 (453.1, 465.3) N/A 4,719 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 448.6 (448.3, 448.9) N/A 1,703,249 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Harding County 6 *** 271.5 (159.8, 432.8) 64 (22, 66) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.8, 3.3)
Ziebach County 6 *** 190.8 (119.0, 289.1) 66 (61, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.0, 5.4)
Sully County 6 *** 265.0 (166.5, 405.5) 65 (33, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.8, 3.9)
Buffalo County 6 *** 499.9 (348.5, 693.0) 17 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.3)
Jones County 6 *** 549.0 (376.7, 782.5) 5 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.6)
Campbell County 6 *** 364.3 (244.0, 531.2) 60 (3, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.5, 6.2)
Mellette County 6 *** 454.9 (331.5, 609.1) 37 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.7)
Hyde County 6 *** 515.0 (372.0, 700.2) 16 (1, 63) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Corson County 6 *** 296.9 (222.4, 387.9) 63 (42, 66) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.1, 6.8)
Bennett County 6 *** 389.8 (296.9, 502.1) 56 (6, 65) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.1)
Perkins County 6 *** 325.9 (246.7, 424.4) 62 (27, 66) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 *** 428.9 (331.5, 545.6) 49 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.7)
Jerauld County 6 *** 427.0 (322.6, 558.6) 51 (2, 65) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.6)
Haakon County 6 *** 460.7 (353.8, 595.4) 34 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-18.5, 17.2)
Sanborn County 6 *** 495.0 (382.3, 631.8) 18 (1, 62) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.5)
Miner County 6 *** 527.4 (410.0, 670.2) 12 (1, 60) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.7)
Faulk County 6 *** 488.1 (383.2, 616.0) 19 (1, 62) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.6)
Stanley County 6 *** 436.8 (347.4, 544.0) 45 (3, 63) 18 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Potter County 6 *** 463.1 (355.9, 595.7) 33 (1, 64) 18 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.0)
Hanson County 6 *** 558.8 (442.9, 695.1) 2 (1, 57) 19 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 5.3)
McPherson County 6 *** 524.8 (412.3, 661.1) 13 (1, 60) 20 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.6)
Lyman County 6 *** 434.2 (349.6, 533.6) 47 (4, 64) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.9)
Aurora County 6 *** 553.8 (448.3, 678.4) 4 (1, 54) 21 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.4)
Dewey County 6 *** 444.3 (362.2, 538.8) 41 (3, 63) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 2.9)
Douglas County 6 *** 555.0 (444.4, 685.9) 3 (1, 55) 22 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.5)
Marshall County 6 *** 346.7 (282.8, 421.8) 61 (35, 65) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.6)
Hand County 6 *** 475.2 (382.7, 585.0) 28 (1, 61) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
Clark County 6 *** 516.2 (428.9, 617.7) 15 (1, 56) 28 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.6)
Gregory County 6 *** 434.8 (359.3, 523.0) 46 (5, 62) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.3)
Todd County 6 *** 457.7 (381.9, 543.0) 36 (3, 61) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Deuel County 6 *** 450.2 (376.9, 535.3) 38 (4, 62) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Edmunds County 6 *** 528.2 (441.1, 628.8) 10 (1, 54) 30 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 5.8)
Walworth County 6 *** 386.0 (323.3, 458.3) 57 (19, 64) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Hamlin County 6 *** 458.9 (388.6, 538.6) 35 (4, 60) 33 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Moody County 6 *** 383.2 (326.0, 448.3) 58 (24, 64) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Brule County 6 *** 537.2 (459.5, 625.0) 7 (1, 48) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
Tripp County 6 *** 447.0 (382.0, 521.1) 40 (6, 61) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
McCook County 6 *** 546.4 (470.3, 632.0) 6 (1, 45) 40 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Shannon County 6 *** 428.6 (367.2, 496.6) 50 (8, 62) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Day County 6 *** 478.2 (409.5, 556.3) 27 (3, 58) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Bon Homme County 6 *** 448.1 (388.2, 515.3) 39 (8, 61) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Kingsbury County 6 *** 613.8 (532.4, 705.4) 1 (1, 25) 47 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.4)
Spink County 6 *** 530.5 (460.6, 608.6) 9 (1, 46) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Grant County 6 *** 464.5 (405.5, 530.5) 32 (4, 58) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Roberts County 6 *** 394.4 (344.5, 449.6) 54 (24, 63) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 471.8 (410.8, 539.9) 30 (4, 58) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Custer County 6 *** 370.6 (322.4, 425.4) 59 (34, 64) 57 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Turner County 6 *** 481.6 (424.6, 544.7) 26 (4, 54) 57 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.6)
Charles Mix County 6 *** 484.7 (427.6, 547.6) 23 (4, 53) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Fall River County 6 *** 485.0 (424.7, 553.1) 22 (3, 53) 59 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.6)
Butte County 6 *** 439.8 (389.1, 495.8) 42 (11, 60) 61 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Clay County 6 *** 534.4 (475.7, 598.4) 8 (1, 42) 64 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.3)
Lake County 6 *** 438.6 (392.0, 489.6) 43 (13, 59) 76 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Union County 6 *** 527.4 (480.5, 578.0) 11 (2, 37) 100 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.7)
Hughes County 6 *** 487.6 (445.5, 532.7) 20 (6, 47) 107 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 1.9)
Beadle County 6 *** 482.2 (440.9, 526.4) 25 (6, 48) 110 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Yankton County 6 *** 393.6 (361.4, 428.0) 55 (36, 62) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Meade County 6 *** 400.1 (367.8, 434.6) 53 (34, 61) 122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Davison County 6 *** 485.1 (445.5, 527.4) 21 (6, 46) 122 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.0)
Lawrence County 6 *** 403.6 (372.1, 437.3) 52 (34, 61) 140 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Brookings County 6 *** 482.8 (447.7, 520.0) 24 (8, 46) 147 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Codington County 6 *** 466.4 (434.4, 500.2) 31 (13, 49) 167 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Brown County 6 *** 473.4 (444.9, 503.3) 29 (12, 46) 224 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Lincoln County 6 *** 437.9 (412.6, 464.3) 44 (24, 55) 237 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Pennington County 6 *** 429.4 (413.2, 446.1) 48 (32, 53) 576 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Minnehaha County 6 *** 521.8 (506.8, 537.1) 14 (6, 23) 986 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2021 6:52 pm.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). Due to the nature of data submissions, we will use the older code/name this year and transition to the new code/name with a future data release.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top