Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota 6 N/A 440.5 (432.2, 449.0) N/A 2,353 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 421.1 (420.7, 421.5) N/A 856,144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Minnehaha County 6 Urban 500.7 (480.9, 521.1) 12 (8, 25) 518 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Pennington County 6 Urban 431.5 (408.7, 455.4) 29 (19, 47) 304 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 441.0 (409.2, 474.6) 26 (14, 47) 149 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.9)
Brown County 6 Rural 458.1 (418.1, 500.9) 21 (11, 44) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Codington County 6 Rural 474.8 (429.4, 524.0) 18 (8, 42) 90 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.1)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 373.3 (331.9, 419.1) 55 (27, 61) 71 falling falling trend -10.0 (-16.1, -0.9)
Meade County 6 Urban 404.8 (361.4, 452.1) 43 (18, 58) 70 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.2)
Yankton County 6 Rural 410.0 (362.1, 462.7) 41 (16, 58) 63 rising rising trend 9.6 (4.4, 17.9)
Brookings County 6 Rural 399.7 (353.8, 449.9) 46 (18, 59) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-7.0, 6.9)
Davison County 6 Rural 437.9 (384.7, 496.6) 27 (11, 54) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.9)
Hughes County 6 Rural 483.8 (425.7, 547.9) 17 (6, 46) 55 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.9)
Union County 6 Urban 420.3 (364.2, 482.9) 35 (13, 59) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.1)
Beadle County 6 Rural 322.1 (276.0, 374.1) 61 (40, 64) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Clay County 6 Rural 541.3 (458.1, 635.1) 10 (2, 40) 34 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.6)
Butte County 6 Rural 455.3 (381.5, 540.0) 22 (7, 57) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Lake County 6 Rural 412.9 (342.9, 494.0) 40 (10, 62) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Custer County 6 Urban 368.4 (299.5, 451.7) 56 (18, 63) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 13.5)
Turner County 6 Urban 446.6 (367.6, 538.6) 24 (7, 60) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-14.2, 1.9)
Fall River County 6 Rural 383.9 (312.3, 471.0) 50 (14, 63) 25 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Charles Mix County 6 Rural 426.0 (348.4, 516.0) 31 (8, 61) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.9)
Hutchinson County 6 Rural 436.6 (351.3, 537.2) 28 (7, 60) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.5)
McCook County 6 Urban 602.7 (491.0, 733.6) 6 (1, 34) 23 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.2)
Roberts County 6 Rural 318.0 (256.5, 390.4) 62 (31, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.4)
Grant County 6 Rural 361.5 (290.0, 447.4) 58 (18, 64) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Oglala Lakota County 6 Rural 382.1 (309.8, 465.6) 52 (14, 63) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.8)
Spink County 6 Rural 413.3 (324.7, 519.7) 39 (8, 63) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.3)
Day County 6 Rural 424.8 (328.9, 542.3) 32 (5, 63) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.5)
Bon Homme County 6 Rural 397.3 (306.1, 508.9) 47 (9, 63) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 3.6)
Moody County 6 Rural 404.4 (317.0, 509.7) 44 (9, 63) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Kingsbury County 6 Rural 416.1 (322.8, 530.7) 36 (7, 63) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 4.0)
Todd County 6 Rural 564.4 (441.0, 708.6) 9 (1, 48) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.6, 6.5)
Walworth County 6 Rural 424.0 (329.1, 539.8) 33 (6, 63) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 4.6)
Tripp County 6 Rural 366.7 (282.7, 470.4) 57 (12, 64) 16 falling falling trend -18.0 (-29.6, -7.5)
Brule County 6 Rural 375.5 (289.3, 481.9) 54 (11, 64) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.2)
Hamlin County 6 Rural 467.8 (362.9, 593.6) 19 (4, 61) 15 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.2, 7.5)
Gregory County 6 Rural 489.0 (369.0, 638.6) 15 (2, 60) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 4.6)
Dewey County 6 Rural 600.4 (462.7, 764.7) 7 (1, 49) 14 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.7)
Aurora County 6 Rural 703.0 (524.7, 924.6) 1 (1, 36) 13 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.4, 9.4)
Clark County 6 Rural 533.4 (393.7, 707.9) 11 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 6.5)
Deuel County 6 Rural 421.6 (315.9, 554.3) 34 (5, 63) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.6)
Edmunds County 6 Rural 383.3 (275.6, 521.0) 51 (7, 64) 10 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 6.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 302.6 (223.6, 406.3) 63 (26, 64) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 4.6)
Faulk County 6 Rural 631.2 (445.3, 872.6) 4 (1, 54) 10 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.2)
McPherson County 6 Rural 460.4 (320.3, 649.5) 20 (2, 64) 10 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.3)
Douglas County 6 Rural 448.5 (308.3, 632.7) 23 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.1, 5.6)
Hand County 6 Rural 429.6 (297.5, 601.8) 30 (3, 64) 9 stable stable trend 3.7 (0.0, 7.7)
Lyman County 6 Rural 384.9 (276.3, 524.8) 49 (7, 64) 9 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.7, -1.9)
Haakon County 6 Rural 495.3 (344.1, 703.3) 13 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.3, 5.6)
Potter County 6 Rural 493.5 (332.5, 707.1) 14 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 4.5)
Jerauld County 6 Rural 695.4 (454.1, 1,020.7) 2 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-5.1, 7.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 582.9 (407.2, 806.7) 8 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.9, 9.2)
Stanley County 6 Rural 405.5 (279.9, 571.4) 42 (3, 64) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.6)
Miner County 6 Rural 485.1 (324.8, 700.4) 16 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.5)
Perkins County 6 Rural 345.0 (230.9, 500.6) 59 (8, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.4)
Sanborn County 6 Rural 416.0 (278.1, 604.0) 37 (3, 64) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.4, 8.1)
Bennett County 6 Rural 381.2 (260.1, 539.2) 53 (6, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.2)
Hanson County 6 Rural 396.1 (259.6, 576.8) 48 (4, 64) 6 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.5, 9.6)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 628.0 (403.4, 929.7) 5 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Hyde County 6 Rural 444.1 (255.3, 731.6) 25 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.5, 8.4)
Jones County 6 Rural 649.4 (402.7, 1,022.1) 3 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-7.0, 11.0)
Corson County 6 Rural 244.3 (149.4, 375.8) 64 (33, 64) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.6, 8.4)
Mellette County 6 Rural 403.6 (245.4, 628.5) 45 (2, 64) 4
*
*
Ziebach County 6 Rural 323.6 (190.7, 513.4) 60 (7, 64) 4
*
*
Sully County 6 Rural 414.2 (234.6, 685.7) 38 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Campbell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 5:17 pm.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). This website now uses Oglala Lakota.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top