Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Tennessee 6 457.7 (455.6, 459.9) N/A 38,378 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Cannon County 6 452.6 (409.8, 498.9) 65 (7, 93) 88 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.3, 7.3)
Houston County 6 540.2 (480.0, 606.5) 2 (1, 75) 64 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.7, 3.8)
Chester County 6 502.4 (460.0, 547.9) 17 (1, 82) 109 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.5)
Lake County 6 441.9 (382.0, 509.4) 80 (2, 95) 40 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.9)
Haywood County 6 507.2 (465.8, 551.5) 12 (1, 78) 122 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.3)
Moore County 6 408.7 (351.5, 473.8) 92 (14, 95) 40 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.3)
Meigs County 6 531.3 (481.0, 585.9) 4 (1, 72) 92 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 2.9)
Crockett County 6 479.7 (435.3, 527.7) 30 (1, 91) 91 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.7)
Trousdale County 6 561.5 (499.9, 628.7) 1 (1, 53) 64 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.8)
Dyer County 6 482.3 (454.0, 511.9) 26 (5, 81) 230 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.3)
McNairy County 6 457.0 (425.5, 490.4) 61 (12, 91) 170 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.7)
Benton County 6 516.1 (474.9, 560.5) 8 (1, 70) 131 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Carroll County 6 517.5 (484.9, 551.8) 7 (1, 53) 205 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.0)
Johnson County 6 421.3 (386.7, 458.7) 90 (33, 95) 118 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 3.1)
Hancock County 6 526.0 (459.3, 600.7) 6 (1, 90) 50 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.7, 3.4)
Van Buren County 6 422.8 (362.9, 491.3) 89 (6, 95) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 4.0)
Greene County 6 491.5 (471.6, 512.1) 21 (6, 57) 508 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.7)
McMinn County 6 471.9 (449.4, 495.3) 46 (12, 82) 358 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Obion County 6 476.5 (446.9, 507.8) 36 (5, 87) 208 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Lewis County 6 505.9 (458.0, 557.8) 16 (1, 87) 90 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.1)
Macon County 6 530.8 (493.2, 570.7) 5 (1, 50) 156 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Dickson County 6 500.2 (475.7, 525.7) 19 (2, 56) 329 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Gibson County 6 474.8 (450.8, 499.9) 40 (10, 84) 308 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Hardin County 6 447.7 (417.1, 480.2) 72 (15, 92) 178 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Hickman County 6 506.7 (471.9, 543.6) 13 (1, 70) 166 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Monroe County 6 491.0 (466.5, 516.5) 22 (6, 69) 335 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Warren County 6 471.9 (445.5, 499.6) 45 (7, 87) 252 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.8)
Grundy County 6 490.5 (445.6, 539.1) 23 (1, 89) 96 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Hardeman County 6 500.3 (466.5, 536.1) 18 (1, 73) 171 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.1, 1.6)
Henderson County 6 457.4 (426.4, 490.2) 60 (12, 91) 172 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.7)
Weakley County 6 472.9 (443.2, 504.2) 44 (7, 87) 204 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 1.5)
Cocke County 6 459.5 (433.0, 487.3) 57 (15, 89) 249 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Decatur County 6 452.9 (408.2, 501.8) 64 (7, 94) 84 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Coffee County 6 464.8 (442.1, 488.3) 49 (14, 87) 333 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Henry County 6 479.7 (451.9, 509.0) 31 (5, 82) 248 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.8, 1.6)
Marion County 6 506.3 (474.5, 540.0) 14 (1, 63) 206 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Marshall County 6 514.0 (483.0, 546.5) 9 (1, 55) 218 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Washington County 6 448.4 (433.9, 463.4) 70 (40, 88) 767 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.7)
Loudon County 6 460.1 (438.6, 482.5) 56 (20, 88) 416 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Madison County 6 439.4 (422.6, 456.8) 82 (48, 91) 549 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Maury County 6 494.1 (475.7, 513.0) 20 (5, 54) 581 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.3)
Lawrence County 6 476.2 (450.7, 502.9) 37 (8, 84) 274 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Carter County 6 409.8 (389.9, 430.5) 91 (73, 94) 352 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 0.9)
Hamblen County 6 461.3 (440.6, 482.8) 55 (20, 87) 393 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Jefferson County 6 476.1 (453.5, 499.6) 38 (10, 79) 367 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 0.9)
White County 6 481.1 (449.4, 514.7) 29 (4, 86) 185 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Campbell County 6 509.1 (482.3, 537.1) 11 (1, 52) 294 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.6, 2.8)
Montgomery County 6 457.9 (443.1, 472.9) 59 (31, 83) 780 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 0.5)
Robertson County 6 477.0 (455.8, 498.9) 35 (10, 78) 404 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Rutherford County 6 448.4 (437.5, 459.5) 71 (46, 86) 1,357 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Stewart County 6 483.7 (439.2, 531.8) 25 (1, 90) 95 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 0.8)
Sullivan County 6 477.9 (464.8, 491.2) 34 (16, 62) 1,122 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 0.3)
Clay County 6 450.7 (396.1, 511.7) 67 (2, 94) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Hawkins County 6 484.0 (462.2, 506.7) 24 (8, 69) 406 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 0.6)
Sevier County 6 506.1 (488.6, 524.1) 15 (3, 38) 693 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 0.4)
Wayne County 6 447.1 (408.7, 488.5) 74 (9, 93) 105 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 0.8)
Bedford County 6 446.0 (421.5, 471.7) 76 (24, 92) 258 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.8, 1.5)
Tipton County 6 479.6 (456.7, 503.5) 32 (9, 77) 346 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.6)
DeKalb County 6 426.8 (392.4, 463.6) 88 (28, 94) 121 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Grainger County 6 471.1 (437.3, 507.1) 47 (5, 91) 160 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Sequatchie County 6 461.6 (419.4, 507.1) 54 (4, 93) 98 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 0.9)
Sumner County 6 464.6 (451.9, 477.5) 51 (26, 75) 1,064 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.0, -0.1)
Williamson County 6 439.7 (427.9, 451.7) 81 (56, 90) 1,125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 0.1)
Pickett County 6 377.0 (317.1, 447.1) 94 (29, 95) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.9)
Putnam County 6 448.5 (429.1, 468.6) 69 (28, 90) 423 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Smith County 6 481.9 (443.3, 523.0) 28 (2, 88) 124 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.1, 1.0)
Humphreys County 6 537.5 (497.0, 580.8) 3 (1, 48) 142 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Shelby County 6 438.5 (432.6, 444.4) 84 (66, 88) 4,500 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Wilson County 6 445.8 (431.4, 460.6) 77 (43, 89) 764 falling falling trend -0.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Davidson County 6 434.1 (427.1, 441.2) 86 (69, 90) 3,062 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.5)
Fayette County 6 463.4 (438.4, 489.6) 53 (13, 89) 290 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.2)
Blount County 6 479.4 (464.9, 494.2) 33 (14, 62) 902 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bradley County 6 438.4 (422.4, 454.9) 85 (49, 91) 593 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 0.3)
Fentress County 6 464.1 (426.7, 504.2) 52 (7, 92) 129 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.5, 0.9)
Hamilton County 6 451.0 (442.2, 460.0) 66 (47, 83) 2,118 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Knox County 6 458.4 (450.3, 466.6) 58 (40, 75) 2,551 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Roane County 6 456.3 (435.0, 478.6) 63 (22, 88) 387 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.8, -0.2)
Cumberland County 6 450.3 (430.5, 471.0) 68 (30, 90) 502 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Franklin County 6 447.7 (422.7, 473.8) 73 (23, 91) 264 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Bledsoe County 6 428.1 (388.8, 470.9) 87 (21, 94) 92 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.0)
Cheatham County 6 481.9 (453.6, 511.6) 27 (4, 82) 237 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.8, 0.3)
Lauderdale County 6 444.9 (411.9, 479.8) 78 (18, 93) 141 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 0.3)
Perry County 6 465.6 (409.1, 528.4) 48 (2, 93) 55 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.9, 0.7)
Rhea County 6 512.4 (482.1, 544.3) 10 (1, 52) 228 falling falling trend -1.4 (-5.6, -0.5)
Giles County 6 438.6 (409.7, 469.1) 83 (28, 93) 187 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.5, 0.0)
Anderson County 6 457.0 (438.4, 476.2) 62 (26, 87) 497 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.2, -0.7)
Morgan County 6 446.8 (412.1, 483.8) 75 (14, 93) 131 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.2)
Jackson County 6 379.7 (338.9, 424.7) 93 (66, 95) 72 stable stable trend -2.0 (-10.5, 0.9)
Union County 6 475.9 (438.1, 516.4) 39 (2, 90) 127 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.1, 0.0)
Polk County 6 473.0 (433.8, 515.1) 43 (4, 91) 118 falling falling trend -2.1 (-9.6, -0.1)
Lincoln County 6 359.9 (335.4, 385.9) 95 (91, 95) 173 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.3, -0.8)
Scott County 6 474.5 (437.9, 513.5) 41 (3, 90) 131 falling falling trend -3.0 (-12.1, -0.3)
Unicoi County 6 444.5 (407.6, 484.3) 79 (10, 94) 122 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.4, 0.7)
Overton County 6 464.8 (430.7, 501.1) 50 (7, 91) 149 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.8, -1.0)
Claiborne County 6 473.5 (444.4, 504.2) 42 (7, 87) 216 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.6, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/03/2024 2:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top