Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6,8 *** 108.7 (107.3, 110.2) 4,420 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 *** 105.4 (105.2, 105.6) 208,732 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Shelby County 6,8 *** 103.1 (99.4, 106.9) 598 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Davidson County 6,8 *** 102.6 (98.4, 107.0) 454 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Knox County 6,8 *** 109.7 (104.2, 115.4) 305 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.1)
Hamilton County 6,8 *** 109.0 (102.8, 115.5) 234 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Rutherford County 6,8 *** 102.1 (95.8, 108.6) 203 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Williamson County 6,8 *** 109.9 (102.2, 118.0) 156 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Sumner County 6,8 *** 117.4 (108.6, 126.7) 133 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Montgomery County 6,8 *** 99.3 (91.4, 107.7) 121 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.5)
Sullivan County 6,8 *** 113.6 (104.0, 123.9) 105 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Wilson County 6,8 *** 112.2 (102.2, 122.9) 94 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Blount County 6,8 *** 122.0 (111.1, 133.7) 93 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.4)
Washington County 6,8 *** 118.4 (107.6, 130.0) 89 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.4, 4.1)
Bradley County 6,8 *** 107.4 (96.4, 119.4) 69 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Sevier County 6,8 *** 118.8 (106.5, 132.1) 69 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Maury County 6,8 *** 127.3 (114.0, 141.8) 67 stable stable trend 8.2 (-3.6, 21.5)
Madison County 6,8 *** 94.4 (83.4, 106.5) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Greene County 6,8 *** 119.7 (105.0, 136.0) 48 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.7)
Putnam County 6,8 *** 109.0 (95.3, 123.9) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Anderson County 6,8 *** 107.7 (94.3, 122.5) 47 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Hamblen County 6,8 *** 112.9 (98.4, 128.8) 44 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Robertson County 6,8 *** 100.2 (87.3, 114.6) 43 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.2, -3.6)
Hawkins County 6,8 *** 125.9 (109.5, 144.2) 43 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 3.8)
Tipton County 6,8 *** 106.7 (92.5, 122.4) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.8)
Jefferson County 6,8 *** 125.8 (108.6, 144.9) 39 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Coffee County 6,8 *** 116.1 (100.0, 134.0) 37 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.6)
Dickson County 6,8 *** 113.6 (97.7, 131.4) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Loudon County 6,8 *** 133.0 (114.1, 154.1) 36 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.2, 6.5)
Carter County 6,8 *** 105.4 (90.3, 122.4) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.7)
Roane County 6,8 *** 109.5 (93.3, 127.8) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
McMinn County 6,8 *** 104.6 (88.9, 122.3) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.1)
Bedford County 6,8 *** 105.5 (89.5, 123.6) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Cumberland County 6,8 *** 106.2 (89.9, 124.6) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Monroe County 6,8 *** 112.2 (94.8, 131.8) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Cheatham County 6,8 *** 112.1 (94.4, 132.1) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.6)
Gibson County 6,8 *** 99.7 (84.1, 117.4) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Warren County 6,8 *** 117.6 (99.1, 138.4) 29 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.5)
Dyer County 6,8 *** 126.3 (106.4, 148.9) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Lawrence County 6,8 *** 108.1 (90.6, 128.0) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Campbell County 6,8 *** 111.8 (93.6, 132.5) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Claiborne County 6,8 *** 141.5 (118.3, 168.0) 27 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.1)
Cocke County 6,8 *** 126.1 (105.1, 150.1) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.7)
Franklin County 6,8 *** 111.2 (92.6, 132.4) 25 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 5.3)
Fayette County 6,8 *** 103.1 (85.1, 123.8) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.1)
Marshall County 6,8 *** 112.8 (92.8, 136.0) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Rhea County 6,8 *** 113.6 (93.1, 137.1) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.2)
Marion County 6,8 *** 127.3 (104.2, 154.0) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.0)
Carroll County 6,8 *** 130.5 (106.5, 158.3) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 1.9)
Henry County 6,8 *** 113.0 (92.2, 137.1) 21 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 3.9)
Henderson County 6,8 *** 118.5 (96.4, 144.2) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 4.9)
Obion County 6,8 *** 109.6 (89.0, 133.5) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.1)
White County 6,8 *** 123.6 (99.9, 151.1) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.0)
Hickman County 6,8 *** 118.6 (95.7, 145.3) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.0)
Scott County 6,8 *** 138.1 (111.5, 169.0) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.4)
Lauderdale County 6,8 *** 111.8 (90.1, 137.0) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Weakley County 6,8 *** 102.0 (82.0, 125.3) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Lincoln County 6,8 *** 92.4 (74.2, 113.7) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Grainger County 6,8 *** 123.7 (98.8, 153.2) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Macon County 6,8 *** 115.6 (92.0, 143.5) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.9)
Giles County 6,8 *** 98.6 (78.3, 122.7) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.9)
Morgan County 6,8 *** 114.8 (91.1, 143.0) 16 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.2)
Hardeman County 6,8 *** 95.6 (75.3, 119.7) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 5.3)
Polk County 6,8 *** 148.0 (116.5, 185.7) 15 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.1, 6.1)
Overton County 6,8 *** 106.4 (83.2, 134.3) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.0)
Union County 6,8 *** 125.0 (97.6, 157.7) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Hardin County 6,8 *** 96.1 (74.9, 121.5) 14 stable stable trend -11.6 (-23.5, 2.0)
McNairy County 6,8 *** 95.0 (74.1, 119.9) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.8)
Unicoi County 6,8 *** 133.1 (103.0, 169.5) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.4)
Fentress County 6,8 *** 116.9 (88.9, 150.8) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.4)
Haywood County 6,8 *** 119.7 (91.1, 154.1) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 7.5)
Humphreys County 6,8 *** 112.4 (85.7, 144.9) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 2.9)
Wayne County 6,8 *** 112.8 (85.8, 145.7) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 7.5)
Benton County 6,8 *** 128.5 (97.4, 166.4) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.7)
Chester County 6,8 *** 111.6 (83.7, 145.6) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.2)
Crockett County 6,8 *** 124.0 (92.5, 162.6) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.0, 6.8)
Johnson County 6,8 *** 93.0 (69.3, 122.6) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.5, 6.4)
Sequatchie County 6,8 *** 120.9 (90.2, 158.7) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.5)
DeKalb County 6,8 *** 82.4 (61.1, 108.8) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.6)
Cannon County 6,8 *** 114.0 (83.8, 151.6) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.3)
Meigs County 6,8 *** 137.5 (100.8, 183.3) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 6.6)
Grundy County 6,8 *** 118.9 (86.9, 158.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.7)
Smith County 6,8 *** 77.9 (56.7, 104.4) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.9)
Stewart County 6,8 *** 114.6 (83.0, 154.3) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.1)
Lewis County 6,8 *** 111.7 (78.6, 154.0) 7 stable stable trend -15.6 (-28.7, 0.0)
Bledsoe County 6,8 *** 75.0 (52.3, 104.7) 7 falling falling trend -13.4 (-23.5, -2.0)
Jackson County 6,8 *** 98.4 (67.0, 139.7) 6 stable stable trend -7.4 (-14.9, 0.8)
Decatur County 6,8 *** 90.2 (60.3, 129.8) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 1.9)
Perry County 6,8 *** 131.6 (87.2, 190.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.9, 6.2)
Hancock County 6,8 *** 144.6 (95.2, 210.5) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.3, 6.6)
Houston County 6,8 *** 119.1 (78.3, 173.4) 5 stable stable trend 4.3 (-2.5, 11.6)
Lake County 6,8 *** 102.8 (67.5, 151.0) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.0, 7.8)
Trousdale County 6,8 *** 89.8 (58.2, 132.3) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.8, 3.3)
Moore County 6,8 *** 106.1 (64.7, 164.9) 4 stable stable trend 6.4 (-0.2, 13.5)
Clay County 6,8 *** 87.3 (52.2, 137.4) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.0, 4.5)
Pickett County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/30/2020 9:38 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top