Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 514.7 (511.4, 518.0) N/A 20,069 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Trousdale County 6 686.5 (587.6, 797.1) 1 (1, 53) 38 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.7)
Lewis County 6 620.9 (545.2, 705.3) 2 (1, 69) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Houston County 6 620.8 (529.7, 724.7) 3 (1, 86) 36 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.8)
Macon County 6 608.0 (548.7, 672.2) 4 (1, 57) 83 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Carroll County 6 592.2 (541.8, 646.4) 5 (1, 60) 108 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Rhea County 6 587.0 (540.5, 636.6) 6 (1, 56) 125 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Haywood County 6 586.3 (521.3, 657.8) 7 (1, 81) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.8, 3.6)
Humphreys County 6 585.7 (526.3, 650.7) 8 (1, 78) 76 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Marshall County 6 583.8 (535.8, 635.2) 9 (1, 66) 118 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Chester County 6 582.5 (515.8, 656.0) 10 (1, 87) 58 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 4.5)
Sevier County 6 580.1 (553.0, 608.3) 11 (2, 38) 375 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 0.1)
Meigs County 6 578.7 (504.6, 661.5) 12 (1, 90) 50 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 2.5)
Hancock County 6 578.1 (478.1, 694.6) 13 (1, 94) 27 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.6)
Benton County 6 576.7 (514.8, 644.8) 14 (1, 85) 71 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.9, 0.2)
Marion County 6 575.5 (526.7, 627.9) 15 (1, 69) 112 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Crockett County 6 574.4 (503.8, 652.8) 16 (1, 87) 51 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.6)
Hickman County 6 565.6 (513.1, 622.3) 17 (2, 82) 91 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.7)
Lawrence County 6 563.7 (523.0, 607.0) 18 (2, 72) 150 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Dickson County 6 562.7 (524.4, 603.1) 19 (3, 68) 172 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 0.0)
Claiborne County 6 562.4 (516.3, 611.9) 20 (2, 77) 120 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Campbell County 6 561.1 (521.3, 603.4) 21 (3, 76) 156 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Monroe County 6 560.0 (523.0, 599.2) 22 (3, 69) 187 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.2)
Obion County 6 556.3 (509.7, 606.4) 23 (2, 82) 113 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Henry County 6 555.7 (512.7, 601.8) 24 (3, 76) 135 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 0.2)
White County 6 555.2 (506.6, 607.5) 25 (2, 83) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Maury County 6 551.8 (523.1, 581.7) 26 (6, 64) 302 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Fentress County 6 551.5 (492.1, 616.7) 27 (2, 89) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2)
Decatur County 6 550.2 (479.9, 629.2) 28 (1, 92) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Greene County 6 550.0 (519.8, 581.7) 29 (6, 66) 268 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Gibson County 6 549.4 (511.6, 589.4) 30 (4, 77) 164 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Warren County 6 546.8 (505.3, 591.1) 31 (3, 82) 135 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.0, 1.3)
Fayette County 6 545.6 (507.4, 586.3) 32 (5, 80) 168 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.4, 0.7)
Grundy County 6 545.4 (478.7, 619.7) 33 (1, 92) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Tipton County 6 543.2 (507.4, 580.8) 34 (6, 79) 185 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.6, -0.1)
Hardeman County 6 541.4 (491.7, 595.1) 35 (3, 89) 91 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 1.4)
Bedford County 6 540.1 (499.8, 582.8) 36 (5, 83) 143 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Hamblen County 6 539.2 (506.4, 573.7) 37 (7, 79) 210 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
McMinn County 6 535.8 (501.3, 572.3) 38 (7, 80) 192 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Cheatham County 6 534.2 (490.5, 580.9) 39 (5, 87) 125 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.5, 0.1)
Henderson County 6 533.1 (485.2, 584.7) 40 (4, 89) 96 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Dyer County 6 526.9 (484.2, 572.6) 41 (6, 89) 118 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.2)
Union County 6 526.7 (469.5, 589.5) 42 (3, 92) 69 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.6)
Robertson County 6 526.4 (493.7, 560.7) 43 (12, 86) 210 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 7.6)
Polk County 6 525.2 (466.4, 590.2) 44 (3, 93) 63 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.5, -0.1)
Cannon County 6 523.6 (457.0, 597.7) 45 (2, 94) 48 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.4, 10.1)
Hardin County 6 523.1 (475.9, 574.3) 46 (5, 91) 100 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.6)
Coffee County 6 522.2 (487.1, 559.2) 47 (11, 88) 173 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Franklin County 6 521.0 (482.5, 562.1) 48 (10, 89) 146 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.5, 0.3)
Weakley County 6 520.9 (476.3, 568.8) 49 (8, 91) 106 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 0.8)
Madison County 6 517.3 (490.3, 545.3) 50 (21, 87) 296 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Hawkins County 6 516.7 (484.5, 550.7) 51 (18, 88) 209 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.1, 0.1)
Jefferson County 6 516.5 (483.0, 552.0) 52 (15, 87) 192 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Sumner County 6 516.1 (496.4, 536.4) 53 (25, 83) 551 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.8)
Hamilton County 6 515.9 (502.1, 530.0) 54 (35, 75) 1,119 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.2, -0.8)
Blount County 6 514.3 (492.7, 536.7) 55 (25, 82) 458 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -1.1)
Knox County 6 513.1 (500.4, 526.0) 56 (36, 76) 1,308 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.8)
Grainger County 6 512.6 (462.3, 567.4) 57 (9, 92) 85 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Wilson County 6 512.6 (489.8, 536.1) 58 (26, 84) 413 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 0.6)
Anderson County 6 512.1 (483.9, 541.6) 59 (22, 87) 264 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.1, -1.4)
Smith County 6 511.7 (453.9, 575.2) 60 (5, 94) 63 stable stable trend -3.3 (-16.1, 0.6)
Sullivan County 6 510.4 (491.1, 530.3) 61 (33, 83) 565 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
Loudon County 6 509.7 (478.3, 543.0) 62 (20, 90) 227 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Overton County 6 508.4 (457.4, 564.1) 63 (7, 93) 78 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Shelby County 6 506.5 (496.8, 516.3) 64 (45, 78) 2,289 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Scott County 6 506.4 (452.1, 565.8) 65 (6, 94) 67 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.9, 0.3)
Lauderdale County 6 504.1 (452.2, 560.4) 66 (8, 94) 74 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.1)
McNairy County 6 504.0 (456.6, 555.5) 67 (12, 93) 89 stable stable trend -5.9 (-13.5, 0.8)
Cocke County 6 502.4 (462.5, 545.2) 68 (17, 92) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Perry County 6 499.1 (417.8, 593.1) 69 (3, 95) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.6)
Rutherford County 6 499.0 (481.6, 516.9) 70 (42, 87) 691 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Stewart County 6 498.2 (435.3, 568.6) 71 (4, 95) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Montgomery County 6 496.2 (473.1, 520.2) 72 (37, 89) 382 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Wayne County 6 494.9 (438.1, 557.6) 73 (7, 95) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 0.5)
Cumberland County 6 492.8 (464.6, 522.7) 74 (32, 91) 278 falling falling trend -2.2 (-6.1, -1.6)
Davidson County 6 492.3 (480.9, 503.9) 75 (55, 87) 1,545 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -1.2)
Sequatchie County 6 490.5 (430.3, 557.8) 76 (8, 95) 52 falling falling trend -9.4 (-17.9, -1.5)
Roane County 6 489.8 (458.5, 522.9) 77 (29, 92) 201 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Putnam County 6 488.5 (459.0, 519.4) 78 (34, 92) 215 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Johnson County 6 484.7 (432.8, 542.0) 79 (14, 95) 67 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.5)
Washington County 6 484.2 (462.5, 506.7) 80 (48, 92) 395 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.3)
DeKalb County 6 484.1 (431.5, 541.9) 81 (18, 95) 66 stable stable trend 4.3 (-3.0, 9.8)
Giles County 6 483.4 (439.4, 531.1) 82 (21, 94) 96 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.4, -1.0)
Morgan County 6 480.8 (430.4, 536.0) 83 (16, 95) 71 falling falling trend -3.8 (-9.0, -2.1)
Williamson County 6 480.5 (462.4, 499.1) 84 (58, 91) 579 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.1)
Lake County 6 479.5 (392.7, 581.2) 85 (2, 95) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.3)
Bradley County 6 478.9 (454.3, 504.5) 86 (49, 93) 299 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.0)
Unicoi County 6 474.6 (421.1, 533.8) 87 (17, 95) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-10.9, 3.2)
Bledsoe County 6 473.7 (416.6, 537.4) 88 (12, 95) 54 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.5, 1.0)
Clay County 6 467.9 (392.5, 556.4) 89 (7, 95) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.1)
Van Buren County 6 464.4 (376.4, 569.7) 90 (4, 95) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.5)
Jackson County 6 449.7 (387.3, 520.8) 91 (21, 95) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Carter County 6 444.7 (415.4, 475.7) 92 (70, 95) 184 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 0.9)
Moore County 6 432.0 (351.7, 527.9) 93 (13, 95) 21 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.7)
Pickett County 6 431.0 (342.0, 541.1) 94 (7, 95) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.5)
Lincoln County 6 416.5 (378.4, 457.7) 95 (80, 95) 94 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 1:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top