Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 *** 520.7 (517.3, 524.2) N/A 18,932 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 488.5 (488.0, 489.0) N/A 843,303 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Trousdale County 6 *** 625.4 (525.8, 738.5) 1 (1, 85) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.2)
Carroll County 6 *** 612.3 (560.2, 668.3) 2 (1, 47) 108 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
Claiborne County 6 *** 608.4 (558.6, 661.8) 3 (1, 47) 121 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Maury County 6 *** 605.4 (573.3, 638.8) 4 (1, 26) 291 stable stable trend 6.9 (-0.6, 14.9)
Hardeman County 6 *** 598.9 (545.2, 656.7) 5 (1, 60) 97 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.4)
Benton County 6 *** 596.3 (532.6, 666.3) 6 (1, 72) 71 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Fentress County 6 *** 595.1 (530.8, 665.5) 7 (1, 74) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Dickson County 6 *** 593.4 (552.6, 636.5) 8 (1, 47) 169 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
White County 6 *** 589.3 (537.7, 644.9) 9 (1, 68) 101 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Marshall County 6 *** 585.2 (534.1, 640.0) 10 (1, 66) 105 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Meigs County 6 *** 579.3 (502.7, 665.1) 11 (1, 88) 47 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Obion County 6 *** 575.1 (526.9, 626.7) 12 (1, 73) 113 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 2.9)
McNairy County 6 *** 570.5 (519.3, 625.7) 13 (1, 78) 98 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.1, 3.1)
Loudon County 6 *** 565.5 (531.1, 601.8) 14 (2, 65) 230 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Hawkins County 6 *** 560.3 (525.5, 596.9) 15 (3, 68) 210 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Henry County 6 *** 560.2 (516.2, 607.4) 16 (2, 77) 131 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Cheatham County 6 *** 559.0 (511.9, 609.4) 17 (1, 80) 122 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Houston County 6 *** 557.7 (469.8, 658.7) 18 (1, 93) 31 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.1)
Perry County 6 *** 555.8 (469.3, 655.2) 19 (1, 93) 32 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
Sevier County 6 *** 553.5 (526.2, 582.0) 20 (6, 67) 334 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Campbell County 6 *** 553.3 (513.3, 595.8) 21 (3, 77) 150 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Lawrence County 6 *** 552.8 (511.6, 596.6) 22 (2, 79) 141 stable stable trend 8.6 (-0.9, 19.1)
Marion County 6 *** 552.7 (504.1, 605.0) 23 (2, 84) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 552.5 (513.9, 593.4) 24 (3, 78) 168 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.5, 8.8)
Hancock County 6 *** 551.9 (454.6, 665.8) 25 (1, 94) 25 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.9, 6.8)
Grainger County 6 *** 547.7 (494.7, 605.4) 26 (2, 86) 87 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Humphreys County 6 *** 545.6 (487.0, 610.0) 27 (1, 89) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Overton County 6 *** 544.8 (490.7, 603.8) 28 (2, 88) 80 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Rhea County 6 *** 542.5 (497.0, 591.3) 29 (2, 85) 112 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Greene County 6 *** 541.8 (511.1, 574.1) 30 (8, 76) 251 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.6, 9.2)
Sequatchie County 6 *** 541.0 (475.5, 613.9) 31 (1, 92) 54 stable stable trend -8.7 (-22.2, 7.1)
Polk County 6 *** 540.1 (479.2, 607.3) 32 (1, 91) 63 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Scott County 6 *** 539.0 (481.2, 601.9) 33 (1, 90) 67 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Stewart County 6 *** 538.7 (470.8, 614.5) 34 (1, 92) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Tipton County 6 *** 538.4 (501.4, 577.5) 35 (6, 82) 170 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Franklin County 6 *** 538.1 (498.0, 580.7) 36 (5, 84) 143 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Unicoi County 6 *** 535.4 (477.7, 598.9) 37 (2, 91) 69 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.3)
Cocke County 6 *** 535.3 (492.6, 581.1) 38 (4, 87) 128 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Blount County 6 *** 534.7 (511.6, 558.5) 39 (13, 73) 433 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Grundy County 6 *** 534.5 (466.5, 610.3) 40 (1, 92) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Lewis County 6 *** 533.7 (461.0, 615.6) 41 (1, 93) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Putnam County 6 *** 533.4 (501.7, 566.7) 42 (9, 81) 220 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Chester County 6 *** 532.8 (467.3, 605.3) 43 (1, 92) 50 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.1)
Bedford County 6 *** 532.8 (491.1, 577.1) 44 (5, 87) 130 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Gibson County 6 *** 532.7 (495.0, 572.6) 45 (7, 84) 154 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.0)
Union County 6 *** 532.3 (471.2, 599.4) 46 (1, 92) 63 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.6, -1.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 530.2 (495.3, 567.1) 47 (9, 84) 185 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Hamilton County 6 *** 529.7 (515.2, 544.6) 48 (24, 67) 1,069 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.2, 5.8)
Lauderdale County 6 *** 527.5 (473.9, 585.6) 49 (4, 91) 76 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 527.3 (473.4, 585.9) 50 (3, 91) 75 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Shelby County 6 *** 526.5 (516.3, 536.8) 51 (28, 66) 2,251 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Weakley County 6 *** 525.2 (479.4, 574.3) 52 (7, 89) 102 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Hickman County 6 *** 524.5 (472.5, 580.9) 53 (3, 91) 80 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Sumner County 6 *** 522.8 (501.8, 544.5) 54 (21, 77) 503 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Crockett County 6 *** 522.7 (455.4, 597.7) 55 (1, 93) 46 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Knox County 6 *** 522.6 (509.3, 536.1) 56 (30, 72) 1,246 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Macon County 6 *** 522.6 (466.4, 583.8) 57 (3, 92) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Hamblen County 6 *** 522.1 (489.1, 556.8) 58 (14, 86) 196 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Smith County 6 *** 521.6 (460.3, 589.0) 59 (3, 92) 59 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.4)
Henderson County 6 *** 519.8 (470.3, 573.4) 60 (5, 91) 86 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Washington County 6 *** 518.1 (494.7, 542.3) 61 (23, 82) 390 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Sullivan County 6 *** 515.4 (495.7, 535.7) 62 (28, 80) 548 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Warren County 6 *** 514.6 (473.3, 558.7) 63 (10, 89) 121 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Hardin County 6 *** 514.4 (466.8, 565.9) 64 (8, 91) 95 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.6)
Clay County 6 *** 513.9 (431.4, 609.7) 65 (1, 94) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Wilson County 6 *** 513.5 (489.2, 538.8) 66 (24, 85) 368 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Decatur County 6 *** 511.8 (444.2, 588.1) 67 (3, 94) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Madison County 6 *** 510.9 (483.3, 539.7) 68 (22, 87) 273 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Davidson County 6 *** 508.8 (496.8, 521.1) 69 (43, 79) 1,498 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Coffee County 6 *** 506.9 (471.6, 544.2) 70 (18, 90) 160 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Wayne County 6 *** 504.2 (445.8, 568.7) 71 (5, 94) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Dyer County 6 *** 502.4 (459.9, 548.0) 72 (13, 92) 109 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Haywood County 6 *** 501.8 (440.5, 569.8) 73 (4, 94) 53 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 499.4 (474.8, 524.9) 74 (33, 89) 343 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Cumberland County 6 *** 498.4 (469.2, 529.3) 75 (28, 90) 257 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.1)
Giles County 6 *** 497.3 (451.6, 546.8) 76 (13, 93) 94 stable stable trend -5.9 (-12.0, 0.6)
Cannon County 6 *** 495.4 (430.3, 568.3) 77 (5, 94) 44 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.2, -0.7)
Rutherford County 6 *** 490.5 (471.9, 509.5) 78 (51, 88) 598 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Johnson County 6 *** 489.2 (435.4, 548.6) 79 (12, 94) 64 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 4.5)
Anderson County 6 *** 487.9 (459.8, 517.4) 80 (36, 91) 240 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -1.8)
Robertson County 6 *** 487.6 (454.9, 522.0) 81 (33, 91) 181 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
McMinn County 6 *** 486.4 (452.9, 522.0) 82 (34, 92) 167 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Bradley County 6 *** 485.0 (459.4, 511.7) 83 (45, 91) 282 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.5)
Fayette County 6 *** 481.6 (444.0, 521.8) 84 (28, 93) 135 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Williamson County 6 *** 478.0 (458.3, 498.4) 85 (61, 91) 494 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
DeKalb County 6 *** 469.8 (414.3, 531.1) 86 (16, 95) 56 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Bledsoe County 6 *** 469.2 (409.5, 535.8) 87 (14, 95) 48 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.2)
Pickett County 6 *** 466.2 (371.7, 581.8) 88 (1, 95) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Lake County 6 *** 466.0 (377.7, 569.5) 89 (2, 95) 21 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.2)
Roane County 6 *** 452.6 (422.1, 485.0) 90 (65, 94) 179 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.6, -1.8)
Carter County 6 *** 438.2 (408.3, 469.9) 91 (75, 95) 170 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Lincoln County 6 *** 432.7 (393.1, 475.5) 92 (67, 95) 93 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 405.5 (344.8, 475.2) 93 (61, 95) 36 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.2)
Van Buren County 6 *** 401.8 (316.3, 506.1) 94 (19, 95) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.3)
Moore County 6 *** 375.4 (296.9, 470.7) 95 (60, 95) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/12/2021 11:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top