Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 235.4 (233.7, 237.0) N/A 16,732 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Anderson County 6 Urban 231.5 (216.3, 247.6) 68 (22, 92) 194 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Bedford County 6 Rural 223.3 (204.9, 243.0) 85 (27, 94) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.4, -0.3)
Benton County 6 Rural 298.3 (261.0, 339.8) 2 (1, 57) 54 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.6)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural 241.5 (209.5, 277.9) 50 (3, 94) 45 stable stable trend 5.6 (-0.4, 15.3)
Blount County 6 Urban 241.5 (229.7, 253.7) 51 (20, 81) 356 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 0.2)
Bradley County 6 Urban 234.3 (221.3, 247.9) 63 (26, 89) 261 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Campbell County 6 Urban 278.4 (255.8, 302.7) 7 (1, 48) 124 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Cannon County 6 Urban 256.6 (220.9, 296.8) 23 (1, 93) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.1, 1.6)
Carroll County 6 Rural 246.2 (219.9, 274.9) 40 (3, 91) 73 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Carter County 6 Urban 223.5 (206.4, 241.8) 84 (31, 94) 144 stable stable trend -3.2 (-9.8, 0.2)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 240.4 (220.0, 262.5) 53 (10, 91) 113 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Chester County 6 Urban 256.7 (222.6, 294.8) 22 (1, 92) 44 stable stable trend -14.0 (-27.0, 1.2)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 252.5 (228.3, 278.7) 29 (3, 88) 90 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.5, -0.4)
Clay County 6 Rural 239.8 (192.7, 296.3) 54 (1, 95) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Cocke County 6 Rural 249.4 (227.2, 273.4) 34 (5, 89) 106 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 2.0)
Coffee County 6 Rural 252.6 (234.0, 272.4) 28 (6, 82) 149 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Crockett County 6 Urban 231.1 (195.8, 271.3) 71 (4, 95) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 250.2 (230.9, 270.8) 33 (6, 83) 157 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Davidson County 6 Urban 215.8 (210.8, 220.9) 89 (74, 93) 1,481 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.9)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 218.0 (190.4, 248.9) 86 (17, 95) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Decatur County 6 Rural 248.1 (207.8, 294.5) 36 (1, 94) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Dickson County 6 Urban 270.2 (250.8, 290.8) 11 (2, 56) 157 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.0)
Dyer County 6 Rural 247.7 (224.9, 272.2) 37 (5, 89) 94 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Fayette County 6 Urban 246.0 (224.8, 269.0) 41 (8, 90) 118 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Fentress County 6 Rural 228.8 (198.6, 262.7) 76 (7, 95) 48 falling falling trend -3.8 (-12.3, -1.1)
Franklin County 6 Rural 239.5 (218.3, 262.3) 55 (10, 92) 108 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.5, 0.8)
Gibson County 6 Urban 231.3 (212.7, 251.2) 69 (17, 93) 123 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Giles County 6 Rural 235.8 (211.5, 262.3) 61 (9, 93) 79 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Grainger County 6 Urban 238.4 (211.1, 268.6) 56 (6, 94) 64 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Greene County 6 Rural 257.9 (241.2, 275.6) 20 (4, 68) 201 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.2, 0.4)
Grundy County 6 Rural 265.8 (227.4, 309.4) 15 (1, 92) 37 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 237.5 (220.7, 255.4) 58 (16, 90) 159 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 245.6 (238.3, 253.1) 44 (22, 65) 928 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 0.0)
Hancock County 6 Rural 297.7 (240.7, 365.2) 3 (1, 91) 22 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 4.9)
Hardeman County 6 Rural 250.7 (224.1, 279.7) 31 (3, 91) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 1.2)
Hardin County 6 Rural 233.7 (208.2, 261.8) 64 (9, 93) 70 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 259.9 (241.3, 279.8) 18 (4, 69) 165 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Haywood County 6 Rural 287.8 (252.8, 326.6) 6 (1, 69) 56 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3)
Henderson County 6 Rural 254.8 (228.8, 283.2) 26 (3, 90) 76 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Henry County 6 Rural 245.7 (222.1, 271.3) 43 (5, 90) 92 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Hickman County 6 Urban 272.8 (244.8, 303.4) 9 (1, 74) 75 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Houston County 6 Rural 274.9 (225.6, 332.5) 8 (1, 93) 25 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.4, 0.5)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 288.1 (254.7, 325.1) 5 (1, 60) 61 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 217.2 (180.5, 259.9) 88 (7, 95) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-18.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 251.3 (232.5, 271.4) 30 (6, 83) 151 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.5, 0.9)
Johnson County 6 Rural 206.6 (178.4, 238.6) 92 (24, 95) 43 stable stable trend -7.8 (-25.5, 0.0)
Knox County 6 Urban 229.6 (223.4, 236.0) 74 (48, 85) 1,092 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.7, -0.2)
Lake County 6 Rural 198.8 (157.2, 249.7) 93 (10, 95) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 225.9 (200.7, 253.7) 80 (14, 94) 62 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.7, 5.9)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 237.5 (217.2, 259.3) 59 (13, 92) 110 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lewis County 6 Rural 266.7 (227.1, 311.7) 13 (1, 92) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 182.0 (162.3, 203.5) 95 (85, 95) 71 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.7, -1.2)
Loudon County 6 Urban 233.6 (214.7, 253.9) 65 (16, 93) 137 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Macon County 6 Urban 267.2 (238.7, 298.2) 12 (1, 81) 69 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Madison County 6 Urban 228.1 (214.6, 242.3) 77 (35, 92) 236 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Marion County 6 Urban 293.0 (265.4, 323.0) 4 (1, 43) 94 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Marshall County 6 Rural 270.4 (246.0, 296.8) 10 (1, 69) 97 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Maury County 6 Urban 241.9 (228.2, 256.4) 49 (16, 84) 252 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
McMinn County 6 Rural 245.5 (226.8, 265.6) 45 (8, 86) 142 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
McNairy County 6 Rural 238.4 (211.5, 267.9) 57 (5, 93) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 265.8 (226.7, 310.2) 16 (1, 91) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.6, 1.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 266.2 (245.2, 288.6) 14 (2, 66) 137 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 217.2 (207.6, 227.0) 87 (61, 93) 402 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.8, 1.0)
Moore County 6 Rural 262.6 (209.9, 325.9) 17 (1, 94) 19 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.9)
Morgan County 6 Urban 224.7 (197.7, 254.7) 83 (13, 95) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-13.3, 1.0)
Obion County 6 Rural 247.3 (222.6, 274.1) 38 (5, 91) 82 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5)
Overton County 6 Rural 232.9 (205.3, 263.5) 66 (8, 94) 57 stable stable trend -11.7 (-25.8, 0.2)
Perry County 6 Rural 231.2 (186.8, 283.8) 70 (1, 95) 21 stable stable trend -2.3 (-24.2, 1.1)
Pickett County 6 Rural 198.3 (146.2, 265.6) 94 (4, 95) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-15.3, -1.7)
Polk County 6 Urban 229.0 (197.9, 264.0) 75 (6, 95) 44 stable stable trend -4.4 (-19.4, 0.0)
Putnam County 6 Rural 225.6 (210.1, 242.0) 81 (27, 93) 169 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Rhea County 6 Rural 248.2 (224.3, 274.1) 35 (5, 91) 88 falling falling trend -2.1 (-8.3, -0.8)
Roane County 6 Urban 240.8 (222.4, 260.5) 52 (11, 90) 150 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Robertson County 6 Urban 232.1 (216.7, 248.3) 67 (22, 91) 185 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.5)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 225.0 (217.6, 232.6) 82 (54, 90) 715 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4)
Scott County 6 Rural 256.0 (226.3, 288.6) 24 (2, 91) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Sequatchie County 6 Urban 227.9 (194.7, 265.6) 78 (6, 95) 38 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 0.3)
Sevier County 6 Rural 255.8 (241.5, 270.7) 25 (8, 65) 273 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Shelby County 6 Urban 229.6 (225.1, 234.2) 73 (53, 84) 2,124 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.1)
Smith County 6 Urban 257.3 (226.6, 291.3) 21 (1, 90) 56 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 2.0)
Stewart County 6 Urban 243.6 (207.5, 284.7) 47 (2, 94) 37 falling falling trend -3.4 (-15.9, -0.4)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 254.1 (242.8, 265.7) 27 (10, 59) 436 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.3, 0.5)
Sumner County 6 Urban 242.6 (232.8, 252.7) 48 (22, 76) 494 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Tipton County 6 Urban 259.6 (241.7, 278.6) 19 (5, 72) 168 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.3, 1.5)
Trousdale County 6 Urban 300.4 (254.0, 353.0) 1 (1, 77) 32 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 13.2)
Unicoi County 6 Urban 250.2 (217.8, 286.5) 32 (2, 93) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.4)
Union County 6 Urban 245.5 (215.7, 278.5) 46 (2, 93) 56 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 213.7 (163.8, 275.5) 91 (2, 95) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9)
Warren County 6 Rural 234.9 (214.1, 257.3) 62 (12, 93) 101 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 0.1)
Washington County 6 Urban 227.3 (215.6, 239.5) 79 (38, 91) 311 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 236.0 (204.2, 271.9) 60 (4, 94) 43 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0)
Weakley County 6 Rural 247.2 (222.1, 274.6) 39 (5, 90) 78 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
White County 6 Rural 245.8 (219.5, 274.5) 42 (3, 92) 71 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Williamson County 6 Urban 214.8 (206.5, 223.3) 90 (70, 94) 543 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Wilson County 6 Urban 230.4 (219.4, 241.7) 72 (36, 89) 355 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top