Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee 6 | N/A | 235.4 (233.7, 237.0) | N/A | 16,732 | falling | -1.4 (-2.1, -0.4) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) | N/A | 734,330 | stable | -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0) |
Anderson County 6 | Urban | 231.5 (216.3, 247.6) | 68 (22, 92) | 194 | stable | -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0) |
Bedford County 6 | Rural | 223.3 (204.9, 243.0) | 85 (27, 94) | 114 | falling | -1.1 (-3.4, -0.3) |
Benton County 6 | Rural | 298.3 (261.0, 339.8) | 2 (1, 57) | 54 | stable | 1.0 (-0.6, 2.6) |
Bledsoe County 6 | Rural | 241.5 (209.5, 277.9) | 50 (3, 94) | 45 | stable | 5.6 (-0.4, 15.3) |
Blount County 6 | Urban | 241.5 (229.7, 253.7) | 51 (20, 81) | 356 | stable | -0.8 (-4.9, 0.2) |
Bradley County 6 | Urban | 234.3 (221.3, 247.9) | 63 (26, 89) | 261 | stable | 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5) |
Campbell County 6 | Urban | 278.4 (255.8, 302.7) | 7 (1, 48) | 124 | stable | 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4) |
Cannon County 6 | Urban | 256.6 (220.9, 296.8) | 23 (1, 93) | 41 | stable | -0.5 (-8.1, 1.6) |
Carroll County 6 | Rural | 246.2 (219.9, 274.9) | 40 (3, 91) | 73 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
Carter County 6 | Urban | 223.5 (206.4, 241.8) | 84 (31, 94) | 144 | stable | -3.2 (-9.8, 0.2) |
Cheatham County 6 | Urban | 240.4 (220.0, 262.5) | 53 (10, 91) | 113 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
Chester County 6 | Urban | 256.7 (222.6, 294.8) | 22 (1, 92) | 44 | stable | -14.0 (-27.0, 1.2) |
Claiborne County 6 | Rural | 252.5 (228.3, 278.7) | 29 (3, 88) | 90 | falling | -6.5 (-11.5, -0.4) |
Clay County 6 | Rural | 239.8 (192.7, 296.3) | 54 (1, 95) | 21 | stable | -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Cocke County 6 | Rural | 249.4 (227.2, 273.4) | 34 (5, 89) | 106 | stable | 0.8 (-0.2, 2.0) |
Coffee County 6 | Rural | 252.6 (234.0, 272.4) | 28 (6, 82) | 149 | rising | 1.1 (0.1, 2.2) |
Crockett County 6 | Urban | 231.1 (195.8, 271.3) | 71 (4, 95) | 34 | stable | 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1) |
Cumberland County 6 | Rural | 250.2 (230.9, 270.8) | 33 (6, 83) | 157 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
Davidson County 6 | Urban | 215.8 (210.8, 220.9) | 89 (74, 93) | 1,481 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.9) |
DeKalb County 6 | Rural | 218.0 (190.4, 248.9) | 86 (17, 95) | 50 | stable | -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0) |
Decatur County 6 | Rural | 248.1 (207.8, 294.5) | 36 (1, 94) | 31 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0) |
Dickson County 6 | Urban | 270.2 (250.8, 290.8) | 11 (2, 56) | 157 | rising | 1.2 (0.5, 2.0) |
Dyer County 6 | Rural | 247.7 (224.9, 272.2) | 37 (5, 89) | 94 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3) |
Fayette County 6 | Urban | 246.0 (224.8, 269.0) | 41 (8, 90) | 118 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4) |
Fentress County 6 | Rural | 228.8 (198.6, 262.7) | 76 (7, 95) | 48 | falling | -3.8 (-12.3, -1.1) |
Franklin County 6 | Rural | 239.5 (218.3, 262.3) | 55 (10, 92) | 108 | stable | -0.9 (-6.5, 0.8) |
Gibson County 6 | Urban | 231.3 (212.7, 251.2) | 69 (17, 93) | 123 | stable | -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3) |
Giles County 6 | Rural | 235.8 (211.5, 262.3) | 61 (9, 93) | 79 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7) |
Grainger County 6 | Urban | 238.4 (211.1, 268.6) | 56 (6, 94) | 64 | stable | -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3) |
Greene County 6 | Rural | 257.9 (241.2, 275.6) | 20 (4, 68) | 201 | stable | -5.1 (-10.2, 0.4) |
Grundy County 6 | Rural | 265.8 (227.4, 309.4) | 15 (1, 92) | 37 | stable | 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6) |
Hamblen County 6 | Urban | 237.5 (220.7, 255.4) | 58 (16, 90) | 159 | stable | 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1) |
Hamilton County 6 | Urban | 245.6 (238.3, 253.1) | 44 (22, 65) | 928 | stable | -0.4 (-2.3, 0.0) |
Hancock County 6 | Rural | 297.7 (240.7, 365.2) | 3 (1, 91) | 22 | stable | 2.2 (-0.2, 4.9) |
Hardeman County 6 | Rural | 250.7 (224.1, 279.7) | 31 (3, 91) | 70 | stable | -0.3 (-4.4, 1.2) |
Hardin County 6 | Rural | 233.7 (208.2, 261.8) | 64 (9, 93) | 70 | stable | -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2) |
Hawkins County 6 | Urban | 259.9 (241.3, 279.8) | 18 (4, 69) | 165 | stable | 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9) |
Haywood County 6 | Rural | 287.8 (252.8, 326.6) | 6 (1, 69) | 56 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.3) |
Henderson County 6 | Rural | 254.8 (228.8, 283.2) | 26 (3, 90) | 76 | stable | 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8) |
Henry County 6 | Rural | 245.7 (222.1, 271.3) | 43 (5, 90) | 92 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
Hickman County 6 | Urban | 272.8 (244.8, 303.4) | 9 (1, 74) | 75 | stable | 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7) |
Houston County 6 | Rural | 274.9 (225.6, 332.5) | 8 (1, 93) | 25 | stable | -2.7 (-9.4, 0.5) |
Humphreys County 6 | Rural | 288.1 (254.7, 325.1) | 5 (1, 60) | 61 | stable | -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4) |
Jackson County 6 | Rural | 217.2 (180.5, 259.9) | 88 (7, 95) | 30 | falling | -2.3 (-18.3, -0.6) |
Jefferson County 6 | Urban | 251.3 (232.5, 271.4) | 30 (6, 83) | 151 | stable | -5.5 (-12.5, 0.9) |
Johnson County 6 | Rural | 206.6 (178.4, 238.6) | 92 (24, 95) | 43 | stable | -7.8 (-25.5, 0.0) |
Knox County 6 | Urban | 229.6 (223.4, 236.0) | 74 (48, 85) | 1,092 | falling | -0.8 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Lake County 6 | Rural | 198.8 (157.2, 249.7) | 93 (10, 95) | 16 | stable | 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9) |
Lauderdale County 6 | Rural | 225.9 (200.7, 253.7) | 80 (14, 94) | 62 | stable | 2.1 (-1.7, 5.9) |
Lawrence County 6 | Rural | 237.5 (217.2, 259.3) | 59 (13, 92) | 110 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Lewis County 6 | Rural | 266.7 (227.1, 311.7) | 13 (1, 92) | 36 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2) |
Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 182.0 (162.3, 203.5) | 95 (85, 95) | 71 | falling | -3.1 (-6.7, -1.2) |
Loudon County 6 | Urban | 233.6 (214.7, 253.9) | 65 (16, 93) | 137 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7) |
Macon County 6 | Urban | 267.2 (238.7, 298.2) | 12 (1, 81) | 69 | stable | 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8) |
Madison County 6 | Urban | 228.1 (214.6, 242.3) | 77 (35, 92) | 236 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9) |
Marion County 6 | Urban | 293.0 (265.4, 323.0) | 4 (1, 43) | 94 | stable | 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1) |
Marshall County 6 | Rural | 270.4 (246.0, 296.8) | 10 (1, 69) | 97 | rising | 1.1 (0.1, 2.2) |
Maury County 6 | Urban | 241.9 (228.2, 256.4) | 49 (16, 84) | 252 | stable | 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8) |
McMinn County 6 | Rural | 245.5 (226.8, 265.6) | 45 (8, 86) | 142 | stable | 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7) |
McNairy County 6 | Rural | 238.4 (211.5, 267.9) | 57 (5, 93) | 64 | stable | 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4) |
Meigs County 6 | Rural | 265.8 (226.7, 310.2) | 16 (1, 91) | 37 | stable | 0.1 (-5.6, 1.6) |
Monroe County 6 | Rural | 266.2 (245.2, 288.6) | 14 (2, 66) | 137 | stable | 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5) |
Montgomery County 6 | Urban | 217.2 (207.6, 227.0) | 87 (61, 93) | 402 | stable | -0.5 (-4.8, 1.0) |
Moore County 6 | Rural | 262.6 (209.9, 325.9) | 17 (1, 94) | 19 | stable | 2.3 (-1.4, 6.9) |
Morgan County 6 | Urban | 224.7 (197.7, 254.7) | 83 (13, 95) | 54 | stable | -1.5 (-13.3, 1.0) |
Obion County 6 | Rural | 247.3 (222.6, 274.1) | 38 (5, 91) | 82 | stable | 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5) |
Overton County 6 | Rural | 232.9 (205.3, 263.5) | 66 (8, 94) | 57 | stable | -11.7 (-25.8, 0.2) |
Perry County 6 | Rural | 231.2 (186.8, 283.8) | 70 (1, 95) | 21 | stable | -2.3 (-24.2, 1.1) |
Pickett County 6 | Rural | 198.3 (146.2, 265.6) | 94 (4, 95) | 12 | falling | -5.2 (-15.3, -1.7) |
Polk County 6 | Urban | 229.0 (197.9, 264.0) | 75 (6, 95) | 44 | stable | -4.4 (-19.4, 0.0) |
Putnam County 6 | Rural | 225.6 (210.1, 242.0) | 81 (27, 93) | 169 | stable | -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6) |
Rhea County 6 | Rural | 248.2 (224.3, 274.1) | 35 (5, 91) | 88 | falling | -2.1 (-8.3, -0.8) |
Roane County 6 | Urban | 240.8 (222.4, 260.5) | 52 (11, 90) | 150 | stable | 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Robertson County 6 | Urban | 232.1 (216.7, 248.3) | 67 (22, 91) | 185 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.5) |
Rutherford County 6 | Urban | 225.0 (217.6, 232.6) | 82 (54, 90) | 715 | stable | 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4) |
Scott County 6 | Rural | 256.0 (226.3, 288.6) | 24 (2, 91) | 58 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
Sequatchie County 6 | Urban | 227.9 (194.7, 265.6) | 78 (6, 95) | 38 | stable | -1.2 (-4.5, 0.3) |
Sevier County 6 | Rural | 255.8 (241.5, 270.7) | 25 (8, 65) | 273 | stable | 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8) |
Shelby County 6 | Urban | 229.6 (225.1, 234.2) | 73 (53, 84) | 2,124 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.1) |
Smith County 6 | Urban | 257.3 (226.6, 291.3) | 21 (1, 90) | 56 | stable | 0.7 (-0.4, 2.0) |
Stewart County 6 | Urban | 243.6 (207.5, 284.7) | 47 (2, 94) | 37 | falling | -3.4 (-15.9, -0.4) |
Sullivan County 6 | Urban | 254.1 (242.8, 265.7) | 27 (10, 59) | 436 | stable | -0.5 (-8.3, 0.5) |
Sumner County 6 | Urban | 242.6 (232.8, 252.7) | 48 (22, 76) | 494 | stable | 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8) |
Tipton County 6 | Urban | 259.6 (241.7, 278.6) | 19 (5, 72) | 168 | stable | 0.5 (-5.3, 1.5) |
Trousdale County 6 | Urban | 300.4 (254.0, 353.0) | 1 (1, 77) | 32 | rising | 3.9 (0.7, 13.2) |
Unicoi County 6 | Urban | 250.2 (217.8, 286.5) | 32 (2, 93) | 50 | stable | 1.1 (-1.0, 3.4) |
Union County 6 | Urban | 245.5 (215.7, 278.5) | 46 (2, 93) | 56 | stable | 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4) |
Van Buren County 6 | Rural | 213.7 (163.8, 275.5) | 91 (2, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9) |
Warren County 6 | Rural | 234.9 (214.1, 257.3) | 62 (12, 93) | 101 | stable | -1.4 (-6.2, 0.1) |
Washington County 6 | Urban | 227.3 (215.6, 239.5) | 79 (38, 91) | 311 | stable | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.5) |
Wayne County 6 | Rural | 236.0 (204.2, 271.9) | 60 (4, 94) | 43 | stable | 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0) |
Weakley County 6 | Rural | 247.2 (222.1, 274.6) | 39 (5, 90) | 78 | stable | 1.2 (0.0, 2.4) |
White County 6 | Rural | 245.8 (219.5, 274.5) | 42 (3, 92) | 71 | stable | -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2) |
Williamson County 6 | Urban | 214.8 (206.5, 223.3) | 90 (70, 94) | 543 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6) |
Wilson County 6 | Urban | 230.4 (219.4, 241.7) | 72 (36, 89) | 355 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.