Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 105.5 (104.1, 107.0) N/A 4,333 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Lauderdale County 6 71.0 (53.6, 92.2) 92 (58, 93) 11 falling falling trend -14.5 (-37.3, -2.3)
Cocke County 6 93.2 (75.3, 114.1) 80 (13, 92) 19 falling falling trend -13.9 (-27.8, -0.4)
Claiborne County 6 106.3 (86.0, 130.0) 51 (3, 90) 19 falling falling trend -12.8 (-25.3, -0.9)
Polk County 6 123.9 (94.6, 159.5) 12 (1, 89) 12 falling falling trend -11.1 (-22.2, -4.0)
Bledsoe County 6 76.5 (53.8, 106.0) 90 (23, 93) 8 falling falling trend -9.9 (-27.6, -3.5)
Hawkins County 6 119.0 (102.8, 137.0) 21 (2, 77) 40 stable stable trend -9.5 (-21.8, 2.8)
Loudon County 6 109.3 (92.2, 128.7) 41 (5, 87) 29 stable stable trend -6.8 (-22.6, 0.4)
Lewis County 6 107.8 (76.1, 148.2) 50 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -6.7 (-27.7, 0.6)
Scott County 6 120.2 (95.1, 149.8) 19 (1, 88) 16 falling falling trend -6.6 (-26.7, -0.5)
Coffee County 6 101.5 (86.6, 118.2) 65 (10, 89) 33 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.8, -0.5)
Jackson County 6 84.2 (55.2, 123.3) 88 (4, 93) 5 falling falling trend -5.3 (-13.6, -1.6)
Lawrence County 6 86.3 (70.6, 104.4) 86 (30, 93) 21 falling falling trend -5.0 (-16.1, -1.3)
Rhea County 6 104.0 (84.4, 126.7) 62 (5, 90) 20 falling falling trend -4.9 (-19.5, -2.1)
Warren County 6 104.2 (86.8, 124.0) 61 (6, 90) 25 falling falling trend -4.7 (-11.4, -0.7)
Hardin County 6 111.8 (88.6, 139.2) 33 (2, 90) 16 stable stable trend -3.4 (-24.5, 2.1)
Robertson County 6 101.2 (88.3, 115.4) 70 (17, 88) 45 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.2, -0.9)
Washington County 6 98.9 (89.0, 109.5) 75 (25, 87) 75 stable stable trend -2.6 (-14.7, 0.6)
Decatur County 6 93.9 (62.8, 134.9) 79 (2, 93) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.3, 1.9)
Morgan County 6 106.4 (83.2, 134.1) 57 (2, 92) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-24.9, 4.2)
Stewart County 6 114.8 (83.2, 154.4) 29 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-23.3, 9.7)
Gibson County 6 95.7 (80.4, 113.1) 77 (20, 91) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Lincoln County 6 86.3 (68.8, 106.9) 85 (26, 93) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 0.4)
Overton County 6 100.1 (77.3, 127.7) 66 (3, 92) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.7)
Marshall County 6 108.0 (88.7, 130.1) 49 (3, 90) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-13.3, 2.9)
Anderson County 6 108.7 (95.2, 123.5) 43 (9, 83) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.6, 0.8)
Trousdale County 6 89.8 (58.8, 130.6) 83 (2, 93) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.7)
Hamblen County 6 106.9 (92.7, 122.6) 56 (10, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.4, 2.1)
Humphreys County 6 129.6 (100.4, 164.5) 6 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Grundy County 6 111.2 (80.0, 150.4) 35 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Shelby County 6 99.8 (96.1, 103.6) 73 (47, 79) 566 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.2, 0.5)
Bedford County 6 89.1 (74.6, 105.6) 84 (29, 92) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Benton County 6 117.4 (87.1, 154.8) 25 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.7)
Carroll County 6 111.8 (89.1, 138.5) 31 (1, 89) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Smith County 6 119.5 (93.2, 150.9) 22 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.6)
White County 6 105.6 (83.8, 131.4) 54 (3, 91) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.0)
Cumberland County 6 109.2 (92.5, 128.0) 40 (4, 86) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.2)
DeKalb County 6 73.7 (53.6, 98.8) 91 (37, 93) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.0)
Giles County 6 88.9 (69.4, 112.1) 82 (15, 93) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.0)
Grainger County 6 121.8 (96.6, 151.6) 13 (1, 85) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Putnam County 6 106.0 (92.8, 120.5) 55 (10, 85) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Houston County 6 111.4 (71.9, 164.5) 26 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-10.0, 4.2)
Macon County 6 135.3 (109.7, 165.0) 2 (1, 68) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Maury County 6 111.0 (99.1, 124.0) 34 (9, 80) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Williamson County 6 108.3 (101.0, 116.0) 44 (19, 73) 167 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 0.9)
Davidson County 6 100.0 (95.8, 104.3) 72 (43, 79) 452 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Knox County 6 107.8 (102.4, 113.4) 46 (23, 67) 305 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.9, 1.0)
Madison County 6 92.4 (81.3, 104.6) 81 (35, 90) 51 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Hancock County 6 122.0 (76.3, 185.0) 10 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 4.6)
Montgomery County 6 101.2 (93.5, 109.5) 67 (29, 82) 131 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Wilson County 6 105.3 (96.1, 115.3) 59 (19, 81) 95 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Bradley County 6 106.5 (95.5, 118.4) 52 (13, 81) 69 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Hamilton County 6 107.6 (101.5, 114.0) 48 (23, 71) 235 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Roane County 6 104.1 (88.1, 122.2) 60 (8, 88) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Chester County 6 119.9 (91.3, 154.6) 20 (1, 91) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 4.0)
Obion County 6 100.3 (80.4, 123.6) 69 (5, 91) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Union County 6 116.1 (89.7, 147.9) 23 (1, 89) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Blount County 6 118.0 (107.3, 129.5) 24 (5, 66) 90 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.5, 1.7)
Fentress County 6 103.2 (76.8, 135.6) 64 (2, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.2)
Hardeman County 6 86.0 (66.4, 109.6) 87 (20, 93) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.1)
McMinn County 6 108.4 (92.4, 126.4) 45 (7, 86) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.5)
Sumner County 6 111.9 (103.5, 120.8) 32 (11, 70) 133 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Campbell County 6 120.0 (100.7, 141.9) 17 (1, 79) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Rutherford County 6 100.6 (94.7, 106.8) 71 (36, 80) 216 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Weakley County 6 100.0 (79.8, 123.5) 74 (6, 92) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.7)
Monroe County 6 113.2 (95.5, 133.2) 30 (3, 85) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.4)
Carter County 6 101.5 (86.6, 118.4) 68 (12, 89) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.0)
Crockett County 6 110.0 (79.7, 147.7) 39 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.8, 6.8)
Dickson County 6 123.1 (106.5, 141.5) 14 (2, 73) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Marion County 6 127.9 (104.5, 154.9) 8 (1, 81) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.5)
Sullivan County 6 121.1 (111.0, 131.8) 16 (4, 55) 109 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Fayette County 6 108.4 (90.0, 129.6) 36 (3, 86) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Lake County 6 61.9 (35.2, 102.7) 93 (20, 93) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.5, 6.0)
Johnson County 6 80.7 (58.6, 108.8) 89 (20, 93) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.8, 6.8)
Sequatchie County 6 135.4 (102.4, 175.8) 4 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 6.2)
Tipton County 6 108.6 (94.2, 124.6) 37 (7, 82) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Dyer County 6 115.6 (96.1, 137.7) 28 (2, 86) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.4)
Henry County 6 98.6 (78.9, 121.8) 76 (6, 92) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
McNairy County 6 107.4 (84.9, 134.0) 53 (3, 90) 16 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.8)
Greene County 6 116.0 (101.4, 132.2) 27 (4, 79) 46 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.0)
Sevier County 6 133.0 (119.8, 147.3) 5 (1, 38) 76 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.1)
Unicoi County 6 136.0 (105.5, 172.7) 3 (1, 83) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.2, 5.5)
Henderson County 6 109.0 (87.6, 134.0) 42 (3, 90) 18 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 4.4)
Jefferson County 6 126.0 (108.7, 145.2) 9 (1, 72) 39 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.4)
Franklin County 6 106.3 (88.1, 127.0) 58 (5, 90) 24 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.7)
Hickman County 6 128.1 (104.1, 156.0) 7 (1, 82) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.3)
Perry County 6 122.4 (80.4, 178.2) 15 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 6.1)
Cannon County 6 110.3 (80.5, 147.4) 38 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.1)
Cheatham County 6 120.6 (102.1, 141.5) 18 (1, 80) 30 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.0)
Haywood County 6 124.9 (95.2, 160.7) 11 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.3)
Meigs County 6 160.9 (121.3, 209.3) 1 (1, 70) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 6.7)
Wayne County 6 103.6 (77.8, 135.5) 63 (2, 93) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.3, 9.5)
Moore County 6 108.3 (66.8, 166.8) 47 (1, 93) 4 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.6, 11.3)
Clay County 6 95.2 (56.9, 149.3) 78 (1, 93) 4
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/02/2024 2:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Pickett, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top