Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 *** 523.1 (519.7, 526.5) N/A 19,471 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 487.4 (486.9, 487.8) N/A 859,984 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lincoln County 6 *** 416.4 (377.6, 458.5) 95 (84, 95) 90 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.8)
Jackson County 6 *** 436.6 (374.9, 507.0) 94 (35, 95) 40 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Moore County 6 *** 459.5 (373.9, 561.4) 93 (6, 95) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.5)
Pickett County 6 *** 461.2 (367.0, 576.6) 92 (2, 95) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.0)
DeKalb County 6 *** 465.9 (412.4, 524.9) 91 (21, 95) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Lake County 6 *** 466.7 (379.1, 569.4) 90 (4, 95) 22 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Carter County 6 *** 472.6 (441.9, 505.0) 89 (51, 95) 188 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Roane County 6 *** 475.3 (444.2, 508.2) 88 (48, 94) 191 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Giles County 6 *** 476.4 (432.3, 524.1) 87 (28, 95) 93 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.0, 0.7)
Johnson County 6 *** 481.4 (428.9, 539.4) 86 (20, 95) 64 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 3.9)
Bradley County 6 *** 485.7 (460.5, 512.0) 85 (49, 93) 291 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.2)
Cannon County 6 *** 485.8 (420.9, 558.6) 84 (8, 95) 43 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.4)
Williamson County 6 *** 488.7 (469.3, 508.7) 83 (55, 92) 531 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Polk County 6 *** 491.7 (434.1, 555.6) 82 (9, 95) 58 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 492.0 (440.6, 548.2) 81 (16, 95) 72 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.5, -1.9)
Smith County 6 *** 492.1 (434.0, 556.1) 80 (9, 95) 58 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)
Bledsoe County 6 *** 496.5 (435.8, 564.0) 79 (7, 95) 53 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Davidson County 6 *** 498.2 (486.4, 510.1) 78 (55, 87) 1,500 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Van Buren County 6 *** 498.7 (405.7, 609.5) 77 (2, 95) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.2, 4.8)
Washington County 6 *** 500.7 (478.0, 524.4) 76 (38, 91) 385 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Rutherford County 6 *** 501.4 (483.1, 520.2) 75 (45, 89) 639 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Cumberland County 6 *** 503.2 (474.0, 534.0) 74 (30, 92) 265 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.0)
Dyer County 6 *** 504.6 (462.2, 550.0) 73 (16, 94) 110 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Lauderdale County 6 *** 505.0 (452.7, 561.8) 72 (10, 94) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Putnam County 6 *** 507.7 (477.0, 539.8) 71 (26, 91) 214 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Grainger County 6 *** 508.4 (457.3, 564.1) 70 (11, 94) 81 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Montgomery County 6 *** 509.1 (484.7, 534.2) 69 (31, 89) 365 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
McMinn County 6 *** 509.8 (475.7, 545.8) 68 (24, 91) 178 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Henderson County 6 *** 509.8 (461.6, 561.9) 67 (11, 94) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Anderson County 6 *** 510.6 (482.1, 540.5) 66 (25, 89) 255 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Grundy County 6 *** 511.6 (445.7, 585.3) 65 (4, 95) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Robertson County 6 *** 512.2 (479.0, 547.0) 64 (20, 91) 194 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Wilson County 6 *** 513.0 (489.2, 537.8) 63 (29, 87) 382 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Wayne County 6 *** 513.3 (455.2, 577.3) 62 (5, 94) 59 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
Warren County 6 *** 518.0 (477.1, 561.6) 61 (12, 92) 125 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Sullivan County 6 *** 518.3 (498.6, 538.6) 60 (29, 84) 558 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Sumner County 6 *** 521.0 (500.4, 542.2) 59 (25, 83) 518 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Knox County 6 *** 522.7 (509.6, 536.1) 58 (34, 75) 1,271 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Shelby County 6 *** 522.9 (512.8, 533.1) 57 (38, 72) 2,281 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Clay County 6 *** 523.1 (441.4, 618.1) 56 (1, 95) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Jefferson County 6 *** 524.0 (489.5, 560.5) 55 (14, 89) 185 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Unicoi County 6 *** 524.5 (468.6, 586.1) 54 (5, 93) 70 stable stable trend -10.1 (-28.5, 13.0)
Coffee County 6 *** 525.9 (490.2, 563.7) 53 (13, 89) 169 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Cocke County 6 *** 527.0 (485.3, 571.6) 52 (9, 90) 130 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Hamblen County 6 *** 527.7 (494.8, 562.4) 51 (16, 87) 200 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Gibson County 6 *** 530.2 (492.8, 569.8) 50 (11, 88) 155 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Sequatchie County 6 *** 530.4 (466.3, 601.5) 49 (3, 94) 54 stable stable trend -9.0 (-19.4, 2.8)
Hardin County 6 *** 530.4 (482.7, 582.1) 48 (7, 92) 101 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Decatur County 6 *** 531.4 (463.1, 608.3) 47 (2, 94) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Franklin County 6 *** 533.1 (493.6, 575.1) 46 (8, 88) 145 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.8, 1.9)
Cheatham County 6 *** 533.8 (488.9, 581.7) 45 (7, 90) 121 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Bedford County 6 *** 534.9 (494.1, 578.3) 44 (9, 88) 135 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Hamilton County 6 *** 536.7 (522.2, 551.5) 43 (23, 65) 1,106 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Union County 6 *** 537.4 (477.8, 602.9) 42 (3, 92) 66 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Greene County 6 *** 537.6 (507.2, 569.4) 41 (14, 83) 253 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Hickman County 6 *** 537.7 (486.0, 593.8) 40 (4, 91) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Blount County 6 *** 538.1 (515.4, 561.7) 39 (15, 72) 450 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Overton County 6 *** 539.8 (486.7, 597.6) 38 (3, 91) 81 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Madison County 6 *** 541.0 (512.9, 570.4) 37 (12, 79) 295 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Loudon County 6 *** 541.9 (508.6, 577.1) 36 (8, 81) 227 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Lawrence County 6 *** 543.1 (502.4, 586.4) 35 (7, 86) 139 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Hawkins County 6 *** 544.3 (510.5, 580.0) 34 (8, 79) 210 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Weakley County 6 *** 544.7 (498.5, 594.2) 33 (5, 88) 108 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Scott County 6 *** 549.2 (491.2, 612.4) 32 (2, 91) 69 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 549.4 (509.8, 591.6) 31 (7, 83) 159 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Rhea County 6 *** 550.3 (504.9, 599.1) 30 (4, 85) 115 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Stewart County 6 *** 552.2 (484.9, 627.2) 29 (1, 93) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Haywood County 6 *** 552.7 (489.1, 622.8) 28 (2, 91) 59 stable stable trend 6.4 (-0.9, 14.3)
McNairy County 6 *** 554.6 (504.1, 609.2) 27 (3, 86) 95 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.6)
Monroe County 6 *** 555.2 (517.1, 595.6) 26 (5, 77) 174 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Sevier County 6 *** 560.2 (533.0, 588.5) 25 (6, 62) 346 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Maury County 6 *** 566.1 (535.8, 597.8) 24 (5, 62) 284 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Campbell County 6 *** 567.2 (527.3, 609.6) 23 (3, 71) 158 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Crockett County 6 *** 567.8 (497.5, 645.9) 22 (1, 91) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Tipton County 6 *** 567.9 (530.2, 607.7) 21 (3, 65) 183 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Marion County 6 *** 568.7 (519.2, 622.0) 20 (2, 80) 107 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Humphreys County 6 *** 569.4 (509.4, 635.0) 19 (1, 88) 71 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Marshall County 6 *** 571.0 (521.5, 624.0) 18 (2, 80) 107 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Dickson County 6 *** 572.1 (532.8, 613.7) 17 (3, 68) 169 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Fentress County 6 *** 572.3 (510.4, 640.1) 16 (1, 90) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Houston County 6 *** 581.8 (493.3, 683.2) 15 (1, 92) 33 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.0)
Benton County 6 *** 583.7 (521.2, 652.5) 14 (1, 84) 70 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Henry County 6 *** 584.2 (539.9, 631.6) 13 (2, 62) 140 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Meigs County 6 *** 587.1 (511.2, 672.1) 12 (1, 90) 49 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Perry County 6 *** 587.5 (497.2, 690.8) 11 (1, 93) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Macon County 6 *** 588.0 (528.8, 652.2) 10 (1, 74) 78 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Chester County 6 *** 596.7 (527.7, 672.5) 9 (1, 83) 57 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.3, 4.4)
White County 6 *** 597.2 (545.6, 652.8) 8 (1, 62) 104 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Hancock County 6 *** 608.4 (507.2, 725.8) 7 (1, 92) 29 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.7, 6.1)
Claiborne County 6 *** 608.4 (558.5, 661.8) 6 (1, 50) 122 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Obion County 6 *** 608.7 (559.2, 661.6) 5 (1, 47) 120 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Hardeman County 6 *** 609.0 (555.1, 667.0) 4 (1, 58) 99 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.1)
Lewis County 6 *** 621.6 (543.4, 708.9) 3 (1, 71) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Carroll County 6 *** 627.7 (575.4, 683.9) 2 (1, 37) 113 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Trousdale County 6 *** 690.1 (587.0, 806.2) 1 (1, 49) 35 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2021 3:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top