Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 13.0 (12.6, 13.3) N/A 1,122 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Shelby County 6 Urban 10.5 (9.6, 11.5) 67 (52, 71) 109 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Davidson County 6 Urban 12.2 (11.1, 13.4) 61 (31, 66) 90 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Knox County 6 Urban 12.9 (11.6, 14.3) 48 (25, 63) 74 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.0, 0.5)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 14.4 (12.8, 16.0) 34 (14, 56) 69 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.0, 3.0)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.9, 14.5) 58 (21, 68) 42 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.3)
Williamson County 6 Urban 12.0 (10.2, 14.0) 62 (24, 70) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.3)
Sumner County 6 Urban 12.9 (10.9, 15.1) 47 (17, 68) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.5)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.6, 15.0) 56 (19, 70) 30 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.3)
Blount County 6 Urban 12.6 (10.4, 15.2) 54 (18, 70) 25 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.3)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 13.1 (10.8, 15.7) 45 (15, 69) 24 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.9)
Wilson County 6 Urban 13.2 (10.8, 15.9) 43 (14, 69) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.2, 15.2) 59 (17, 70) 22 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 7.6)
Sevier County 6 Rural 12.7 (10.2, 15.8) 49 (14, 71) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.1)
Greene County 6 Rural 17.1 (13.5, 21.4) 12 (2, 57) 18 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 6.1)
Anderson County 6 Urban 14.7 (11.5, 18.5) 30 (5, 68) 16 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.3)
Maury County 6 Urban 13.3 (10.5, 16.7) 41 (10, 71) 16 rising rising trend 13.2 (1.0, 21.3)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 16.5 (12.5, 21.6) 16 (2, 66) 16 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.7, 7.3)
Robertson County 6 Urban 16.6 (13.0, 21.0) 15 (2, 63) 15 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 5.3)
Madison County 6 Urban 11.8 (9.1, 15.0) 63 (16, 73) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.4)
Bradley County 6 Urban 9.6 (7.4, 12.2) 70 (38, 73) 14 stable stable trend -4.4 (-42.0, 0.5)
Loudon County 6 Urban 14.1 (10.6, 18.6) 36 (5, 71) 13 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 6.7)
Tipton County 6 Urban 16.9 (12.9, 21.8) 13 (2, 65) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.4)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 14.6 (11.1, 19.0) 31 (4, 70) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 6.4)
Roane County 6 Urban 13.0 (9.8, 17.1) 46 (8, 72) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.5)
Dickson County 6 Urban 16.0 (12.0, 21.0) 20 (2, 66) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 5.1)
Gibson County 6 Urban 17.2 (12.9, 22.6) 10 (1, 64) 11 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.4, 7.5)
Coffee County 6 Rural 15.7 (11.7, 20.6) 23 (2, 69) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.3, 7.0)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 12.7 (9.4, 17.0) 51 (9, 72) 11 stable stable trend -5.3 (-24.9, 0.0)
Carter County 6 Urban 12.6 (9.3, 16.9) 55 (9, 73) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.2, 6.0)
McMinn County 6 Rural 12.3 (9.1, 16.5) 60 (11, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.2)
Campbell County 6 Urban 17.6 (12.8, 23.6) 8 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.4)
Putnam County 6 Rural 9.8 (7.2, 13.0) 69 (30, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 5.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 12.6 (9.2, 17.1) 57 (8, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.8, 7.1)
Monroe County 6 Rural 14.3 (10.3, 19.5) 35 (3, 72) 10
*
*
Dyer County 6 Rural 19.0 (13.7, 25.7) 5 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.6, 6.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 14.6 (10.5, 20.0) 33 (3, 71) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.7)
Fayette County 6 Urban 13.4 (9.4, 18.6) 40 (5, 73) 8
*
*
Bedford County 6 Rural 13.9 (9.9, 19.0) 38 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.3)
Hardin County 6 Rural 17.6 (12.3, 24.8) 7 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 5.9)
Cocke County 6 Rural 15.3 (10.6, 21.6) 26 (2, 72) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.5)
Marion County 6 Urban 17.1 (12.0, 24.1) 11 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.1)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 12.7 (8.9, 17.7) 52 (5, 73) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.4)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 13.4 (9.2, 19.0) 39 (4, 73) 7
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural 17.5 (12.1, 24.8) 9 (1, 71) 7
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 16.8 (11.6, 23.8) 14 (1, 70) 7
*
*
Rhea County 6 Rural 16.3 (11.2, 23.1) 18 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.2)
Henry County 6 Rural 12.6 (8.5, 18.4) 53 (5, 73) 7
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural 15.9 (10.8, 23.0) 21 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Giles County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.4, 22.6) 24 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.4, 8.7)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 21.5 (14.3, 31.4) 3 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 5.6)
Obion County 6 Rural 14.0 (9.1, 20.8) 37 (2, 73) 6 rising rising trend 8.0 (2.7, 22.6)
Wayne County 6 Rural 23.7 (15.7, 34.9) 2 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Hardeman County 6 Rural 16.4 (10.8, 24.1) 17 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.6, 6.3)
Weakley County 6 Rural 13.3 (8.6, 19.7) 42 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 5.6)
Hickman County 6 Urban 14.9 (9.7, 22.2) 29 (2, 73) 5
*
*
White County 6 Rural 14.6 (9.5, 21.8) 32 (2, 73) 5
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural 11.3 (7.1, 17.2) 64 (7, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.1, 5.9)
Warren County 6 Rural 8.8 (5.6, 13.3) 72 (26, 73) 5
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 9.2 (5.9, 14.1) 71 (22, 73) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.8, 3.2)
Lewis County 6 Rural 26.5 (16.4, 41.1) 1 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Benton County 6 Rural 16.3 (10.0, 25.8) 19 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban 15.4 (9.4, 23.9) 25 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 6.6)
Morgan County 6 Urban 14.9 (9.1, 23.4) 28 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Smith County 6 Urban 15.8 (9.6, 24.9) 22 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural 15.0 (9.0, 23.7) 27 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.7, 8.0)
Grainger County 6 Urban 11.2 (6.5, 18.3) 65 (5, 73) 4 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.4, 1.4)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural 18.0 (10.4, 29.6) 6 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural 12.7 (7.5, 21.1) 50 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Union County 6 Urban 13.1 (7.6, 21.7) 44 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 9.9 (5.7, 16.3) 68 (10, 73) 3
*
*
McNairy County 6 Rural 8.7 (5.0, 14.4) 73 (21, 73) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.5)
Meigs County 6 Rural 20.1 (11.5, 33.3) 4 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Unicoi County 6 Urban 11.1 (6.0, 19.5) 66 (4, 73) 3
*
*
Cannon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 9:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cannon, Chester, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Fentress, Grundy, Hancock, Haywood, Houston, Jackson, Lake, Moore, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Sequatchie, Stewart, Trousdale, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top