Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Tennessee 6 40.0 (39.3, 40.6) N/A 3,220 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Lake County 6 64.0 (42.5, 93.6) 2 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.6, 8.9)
Loudon County 6 33.6 (27.4, 40.8) 86 (36, 93) 26 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 6.4)
Pickett County 6 56.8 (32.8, 93.1) 7 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.5, 6.7)
Humphreys County 6 58.5 (45.5, 74.3) 6 (1, 69) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.2)
Cannon County 6 58.8 (44.2, 77.2) 5 (1, 78) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.0)
McMinn County 6 42.3 (35.7, 49.8) 46 (11, 87) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
Sequatchie County 6 45.6 (33.5, 61.2) 29 (2, 93) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.1)
Grundy County 6 64.0 (47.5, 84.6) 3 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Crockett County 6 49.1 (35.8, 66.2) 18 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.2)
Polk County 6 46.8 (34.8, 62.0) 26 (2, 91) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.6)
Greene County 6 47.8 (41.6, 54.7) 21 (5, 63) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Henderson County 6 55.0 (44.3, 67.7) 8 (1, 66) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Overton County 6 51.9 (40.6, 65.6) 13 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Benton County 6 46.7 (34.9, 61.7) 27 (2, 91) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.2)
Hardeman County 6 47.8 (37.9, 59.8) 20 (3, 88) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Chester County 6 45.5 (33.1, 61.2) 31 (2, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.7)
Marion County 6 52.4 (42.1, 64.5) 10 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Jefferson County 6 41.1 (34.5, 48.7) 55 (13, 89) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Lewis County 6 54.9 (39.9, 74.5) 9 (1, 89) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.5)
Montgomery County 6 47.0 (42.3, 52.2) 23 (9, 59) 76 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Campbell County 6 51.3 (42.9, 60.9) 14 (2, 63) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Sevier County 6 44.4 (39.2, 50.0) 33 (12, 75) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Carroll County 6 49.5 (40.0, 60.8) 17 (2, 82) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Coffee County 6 47.0 (39.9, 55.1) 25 (5, 76) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Johnson County 6 36.3 (26.3, 49.4) 77 (10, 93) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.8)
Trousdale County 6 69.4 (48.4, 96.6) 1 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.7, 3.4)
Unicoi County 6 43.5 (32.8, 57.2) 37 (3, 92) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.6)
Hardin County 6 37.6 (29.5, 47.7) 70 (13, 93) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Houston County 6 62.1 (43.3, 87.2) 4 (1, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.2)
Dyer County 6 42.9 (34.8, 52.4) 41 (6, 91) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Moore County 6 42.4 (24.9, 68.9) 44 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.4, 5.1)
Rutherford County 6 37.5 (34.2, 40.9) 73 (40, 86) 106 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Bradley County 6 37.1 (32.4, 42.2) 75 (32, 91) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Shelby County 6 43.3 (41.5, 45.2) 38 (25, 57) 431 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Hamblen County 6 39.8 (34.0, 46.4) 61 (18, 90) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
White County 6 41.6 (32.6, 52.4) 49 (6, 92) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Decatur County 6 48.4 (34.1, 67.3) 19 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.8)
Gibson County 6 42.6 (35.6, 50.6) 43 (10, 88) 27 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Henry County 6 42.9 (34.8, 52.6) 40 (6, 90) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Lauderdale County 6 52.0 (41.1, 65.1) 12 (1, 83) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Clay County 6 45.6 (30.0, 68.0) 30 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 2.0)
Grainger County 6 39.7 (30.1, 51.7) 62 (7, 93) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7)
Monroe County 6 41.5 (34.5, 49.6) 50 (11, 90) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.2)
Stewart County 6 52.4 (38.8, 69.8) 11 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.1)
Warren County 6 47.1 (38.8, 56.7) 22 (3, 83) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
DeKalb County 6 38.7 (28.6, 51.4) 67 (8, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Franklin County 6 43.9 (36.3, 52.9) 35 (7, 88) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.1)
Haywood County 6 50.0 (37.8, 65.2) 15 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.4)
Scott County 6 43.6 (32.7, 57.1) 36 (3, 92) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.4)
Sullivan County 6 36.7 (33.1, 40.6) 76 (40, 89) 83 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Blount County 6 35.2 (31.1, 39.6) 84 (45, 92) 61 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Marshall County 6 41.3 (32.9, 51.5) 52 (8, 91) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.8)
Roane County 6 33.6 (27.9, 40.2) 87 (37, 93) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Sumner County 6 40.4 (36.6, 44.4) 58 (25, 81) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Tipton County 6 43.0 (36.3, 50.7) 39 (8, 86) 31 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.3)
Cheatham County 6 40.7 (32.5, 50.3) 56 (9, 92) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.4)
Knox County 6 35.4 (33.2, 37.8) 82 (57, 88) 187 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Fentress County 6 46.3 (34.8, 60.7) 28 (2, 91) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.8)
Macon County 6 49.7 (38.6, 63.2) 16 (2, 88) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.3)
Madison County 6 41.4 (36.2, 47.1) 51 (17, 85) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Cocke County 6 36.0 (29.0, 44.5) 78 (20, 93) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Lincoln County 6 42.2 (34.0, 52.0) 47 (7, 91) 20 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.8)
Maury County 6 41.8 (36.4, 47.8) 48 (14, 84) 45 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Washington County 6 32.0 (28.2, 36.3) 90 (61, 93) 53 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Wayne County 6 41.3 (30.2, 55.6) 53 (3, 93) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 1.4)
Bedford County 6 39.2 (32.1, 47.4) 64 (14, 92) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Davidson County 6 37.4 (35.3, 39.6) 74 (48, 84) 255 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Hawkins County 6 39.2 (33.0, 46.2) 65 (17, 91) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 42.3 (34.9, 51.0) 45 (9, 90) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Hamilton County 6 37.5 (34.9, 40.2) 72 (44, 84) 169 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Perry County 6 47.0 (28.7, 73.0) 24 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.6, 2.4)
Cumberland County 6 34.9 (29.4, 41.3) 85 (32, 93) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Fayette County 6 41.1 (33.8, 49.8) 54 (10, 91) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
Dickson County 6 45.2 (37.9, 53.5) 32 (6, 81) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Giles County 6 39.0 (30.8, 49.0) 66 (11, 93) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.4)
Robertson County 6 40.6 (34.5, 47.5) 57 (13, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Smith County 6 37.5 (27.3, 50.5) 71 (9, 93) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.1)
McNairy County 6 42.8 (33.4, 54.2) 42 (4, 92) 15 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.4)
Weakley County 6 35.8 (28.1, 45.1) 80 (18, 93) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.2)
Obion County 6 44.2 (35.6, 54.4) 34 (6, 89) 20 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.2)
Williamson County 6 32.5 (29.3, 36.0) 89 (62, 93) 78 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Anderson County 6 38.1 (32.9, 44.0) 69 (24, 91) 41 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Putnam County 6 39.9 (34.1, 46.5) 60 (19, 90) 36 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Claiborne County 6 40.3 (32.1, 50.1) 59 (9, 92) 18 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Rhea County 6 33.1 (25.7, 42.1) 88 (28, 93) 14 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.8, 0.0)
Wilson County 6 35.6 (31.5, 40.1) 81 (41, 91) 56 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Meigs County 6 35.3 (23.4, 51.9) 83 (7, 93) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.2)
Hickman County 6 38.5 (29.3, 50.0) 68 (9, 93) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.8)
Carter County 6 29.5 (24.6, 35.4) 91 (61, 93) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.1)
Union County 6 28.5 (19.7, 40.2) 92 (31, 93) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -0.2)
Bledsoe County 6 27.7 (18.2, 41.1) 93 (29, 93) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.4, -0.5)
Jackson County 6 39.6 (26.9, 57.1) 63 (4, 93) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.5, -0.8)
Morgan County 6 36.0 (26.5, 48.0) 79 (12, 93) 10 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.1, -2.1)
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 5:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hancock, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top