Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) N/A 776 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
McMinn County 6 Rural 5.2 (3.2, 8.3) 62 (25, 62) 4
*
*
Williamson County 6 Urban 5.5 (4.3, 7.0) 61 (42, 62) 15 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.7, 8.9)
Obion County 6 Rural 6.3 (3.6, 10.8) 60 (10, 62) 3
*
*
Robertson County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.4, 9.4) 59 (15, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 4.3)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 6.6 (4.4, 9.6) 58 (14, 62) 6 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.4, 9.6)
Warren County 6 Rural 6.6 (3.9, 10.7) 57 (8, 62) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural 6.6 (4.5, 9.6) 56 (14, 62) 6
*
*
Blount County 6 Urban 7.0 (5.5, 8.9) 55 (20, 62) 15 stable stable trend -2.5 (-19.2, 3.2)
Loudon County 6 Urban 7.0 (4.6, 10.5) 54 (10, 62) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural 7.1 (4.4, 11.1) 53 (7, 62) 4
*
*
Roane County 6 Urban 7.1 (5.0, 10.3) 52 (11, 62) 7
*
*
Bradley County 6 Urban 7.2 (5.3, 9.5) 51 (16, 62) 10 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.2, 10.9)
Giles County 6 Rural 7.2 (4.1, 12.0) 50 (5, 62) 3
*
*
Gibson County 6 Urban 7.2 (4.6, 11.0) 49 (8, 62) 5
*
*
Anderson County 6 Urban 7.2 (5.2, 9.9) 48 (12, 62) 9 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.2, 5.4)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 7.4 (5.1, 10.5) 47 (10, 62) 9 stable stable trend 10.1 (-3.8, 36.4)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.5, 12.0) 46 (5, 62) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 6 Urban 7.6 (6.5, 8.8) 45 (22, 58) 38 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.2, 3.0)
White County 6 Rural 7.6 (4.4, 12.7) 44 (5, 62) 3
*
*
Knox County 6 Urban 7.7 (6.7, 8.8) 43 (23, 56) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.2, 2.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 7.8 (6.1, 9.9) 42 (13, 61) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.9, 7.7)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 7.8 (6.1, 9.9) 41 (12, 61) 15 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.4, 9.7)
Maury County 6 Urban 8.0 (6.0, 10.5) 40 (10, 61) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.1, 5.4)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 8.0 (4.6, 13.1) 39 (4, 62) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Urban 8.0 (5.5, 11.5) 38 (7, 62) 7
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 8.3 (5.4, 12.4) 37 (5, 62) 5
*
*
Madison County 6 Urban 8.4 (6.3, 11.0) 36 (8, 60) 12 stable stable trend -4.2 (-25.5, 6.4)
McNairy County 6 Rural 8.4 (4.9, 13.9) 35 (4, 62) 4
*
*
Rhea County 6 Rural 8.4 (5.2, 13.3) 34 (4, 62) 4
*
*
Fayette County 6 Urban 8.6 (5.6, 12.9) 33 (4, 62) 6
*
*
Dyer County 6 Rural 8.6 (5.3, 13.4) 32 (3, 62) 4 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.9, 12.4)
Wilson County 6 Urban 8.6 (6.8, 10.8) 31 (8, 58) 16
*
*
Rutherford County 6 Urban 8.7 (7.3, 10.4) 30 (11, 55) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-16.3, 2.6)
Sumner County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.1, 10.7) 29 (9, 55) 21 stable stable trend 1.0 (-8.6, 5.3)
Dickson County 6 Urban 8.8 (6.0, 12.7) 28 (4, 62) 6
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural 8.9 (6.5, 12.0) 27 (5, 60) 10 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.1, 10.3)
Coffee County 6 Rural 9.2 (6.4, 13.0) 26 (4, 61) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.1, 9.8)
Shelby County 6 Urban 9.4 (8.5, 10.2) 25 (11, 39) 102 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.3, 2.5)
Sevier County 6 Rural 9.4 (7.3, 12.0) 24 (6, 56) 14
*
*
Hawkins County 6 Urban 9.5 (6.8, 13.0) 23 (4, 60) 9 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.5, 14.2)
Carter County 6 Urban 9.5 (6.7, 13.2) 22 (4, 59) 8 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.4, 8.5)
Tipton County 6 Urban 9.7 (6.7, 13.5) 21 (3, 60) 7
*
*
Campbell County 6 Urban 9.7 (6.3, 14.4) 20 (3, 62) 6
*
*
Cheatham County 6 Urban 9.8 (6.4, 14.5) 19 (3, 61) 6
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 10.0 (5.8, 16.4) 18 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Davidson County 6 Urban 10.1 (9.1, 11.1) 17 (8, 34) 78 stable stable trend -3.1 (-19.4, 3.0)
Johnson County 6 Rural 10.1 (5.7, 17.5) 16 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 10.4 (6.5, 16.0) 15 (2, 61) 5
*
*
Bedford County 6 Rural 10.5 (7.0, 15.0) 14 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Smith County 6 Urban 10.5 (5.9, 17.7) 13 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Cocke County 6 Rural 10.9 (7.0, 16.4) 12 (1, 61) 6 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.5, 13.1)
Carroll County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.9, 16.8) 11 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 11.0 (7.8, 15.4) 10 (2, 56) 8
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Urban 11.1 (9.3, 13.2) 9 (4, 36) 28 stable stable trend 3.9 (-11.1, 7.5)
Macon County 6 Urban 11.2 (6.5, 18.1) 8 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Hardeman County 6 Rural 11.7 (7.0, 18.6) 7 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural 11.9 (8.1, 17.2) 6 (1, 56) 7
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural 12.7 (8.1, 19.3) 5 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Benton County 6 Rural 15.7 (8.7, 26.4) 4 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Hickman County 6 Urban 16.9 (11.1, 24.9) 3 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Overton County 6 Rural 17.0 (10.9, 25.7) 2 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural 17.7 (10.8, 28.4) 1 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Bledsoe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 3:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top