Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 8.7 (8.4, 9.0) N/A 755 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 3.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Hickman County 6 16.9 (11.1, 24.9) 1 (1, 35) 6
*
*
Overton County 6 16.6 (10.7, 24.8) 2 (1, 35) 5
*
*
Henderson County 6 13.5 (8.7, 20.2) 3 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Hardin County 6 13.4 (8.6, 20.4) 4 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Benton County 6 12.8 (7.2, 22.0) 5 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Henry County 6 12.7 (8.6, 18.3) 6 (1, 51) 7
*
*
Bedford County 6 12.3 (8.5, 17.3) 7 (1, 49) 7
*
*
McNairy County 6 11.7 (7.4, 17.9) 8 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Davidson County 6 10.5 (9.5, 11.6) 9 (5, 27) 79 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.4, 6.9)
Unicoi County 6 10.4 (5.9, 18.0) 10 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Campbell County 6 10.4 (6.9, 15.1) 11 (2, 57) 6
*
*
Marshall County 6 10.3 (6.3, 16.0) 12 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Claiborne County 6 10.2 (6.4, 15.9) 13 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Cocke County 6 10.2 (6.5, 15.5) 14 (1, 58) 5 rising rising trend 7.4 (2.3, 12.8)
Sullivan County 6 10.1 (8.4, 12.1) 15 (4, 40) 25 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.6, 9.9)
Dyer County 6 10.1 (6.4, 15.2) 16 (1, 58) 5 rising rising trend 7.3 (2.0, 12.9)
Hardeman County 6 10.1 (5.7, 16.8) 17 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Shelby County 6 9.8 (9.0, 10.7) 18 (8, 31) 108 stable stable trend -5.9 (-16.8, 6.4)
Madison County 6 9.7 (7.4, 12.6) 19 (4, 52) 13 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.9, 10.4)
Dickson County 6 9.7 (6.6, 13.9) 20 (2, 57) 6
*
*
Tipton County 6 9.6 (6.7, 13.5) 21 (2, 57) 7
*
*
Giles County 6 9.3 (5.7, 14.7) 22 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Coffee County 6 9.1 (6.2, 13.1) 23 (3, 58) 6 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.1, 10.8)
Cheatham County 6 8.9 (5.7, 13.5) 24 (3, 59) 5
*
*
Sumner County 6 8.7 (7.1, 10.7) 25 (8, 53) 20 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.7, 9.7)
Franklin County 6 8.7 (5.7, 13.0) 26 (3, 59) 5
*
*
Wilson County 6 8.7 (6.8, 11.0) 27 (8, 55) 15
*
*
Sevier County 6 8.6 (6.5, 11.2) 28 (6, 56) 12
*
*
Warren County 6 8.4 (5.2, 13.0) 29 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Obion County 6 8.3 (4.9, 13.4) 30 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Carroll County 6 8.2 (4.7, 13.7) 31 (2, 59) 3
*
*
Greene County 6 8.1 (5.8, 11.1) 32 (7, 59) 9 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.5, 8.5)
Roane County 6 8.1 (5.6, 11.5) 33 (6, 59) 7
*
*
Monroe County 6 8.1 (5.3, 12.0) 34 (5, 59) 6
*
*
Blount County 6 8.1 (6.4, 10.1) 35 (11, 56) 16 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 6.6)
Knox County 6 8.0 (7.0, 9.2) 36 (18, 51) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.6)
Hawkins County 6 8.0 (5.6, 11.4) 37 (6, 59) 7 rising rising trend 6.3 (0.3, 12.6)
Loudon County 6 7.9 (5.4, 11.5) 38 (6, 59) 7
*
*
White County 6 7.7 (4.4, 12.8) 39 (4, 59) 3
*
*
Rhea County 6 7.6 (4.5, 12.4) 40 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 7.6 (4.5, 12.3) 41 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 6 7.6 (6.5, 8.8) 42 (20, 54) 37 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 6.0)
Maury County 6 7.6 (5.6, 10.2) 43 (9, 59) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.4)
Carter County 6 7.6 (5.1, 11.0) 44 (8, 59) 7 stable stable trend 3.8 (0.0, 7.8)
Montgomery County 6 7.5 (5.7, 9.6) 45 (13, 58) 13 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.3, 9.6)
Washington County 6 7.5 (5.8, 9.6) 46 (13, 58) 13 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.3, 7.7)
Rutherford County 6 7.4 (6.0, 8.9) 47 (18, 57) 22 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 6.2)
Anderson County 6 7.3 (5.2, 10.1) 48 (9, 59) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.7, 5.2)
Putnam County 6 7.3 (5.0, 10.4) 49 (9, 59) 7
*
*
Gibson County 6 7.3 (4.5, 11.1) 50 (6, 59) 5
*
*
Fayette County 6 7.0 (4.4, 10.9) 51 (7, 59) 5
*
*
Bradley County 6 6.7 (4.9, 9.0) 52 (18, 59) 9 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.1, 10.2)
McMinn County 6 6.5 (4.2, 9.8) 53 (11, 59) 5
*
*
Cumberland County 6 6.4 (4.5, 9.2) 54 (17, 59) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.6)
Robertson County 6 6.4 (4.3, 9.3) 55 (14, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.9)
Williamson County 6 6.1 (4.7, 7.7) 56 (28, 59) 15 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.7, 9.2)
Jefferson County 6 6.0 (3.8, 9.2) 57 (15, 59) 5
*
*
Lawrence County 6 5.1 (2.9, 8.6) 58 (20, 59) 3
*
*
Hamblen County 6 4.9 (3.0, 7.6) 59 (27, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 6.1)
Bledsoe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/30/2023 11:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Cannon, Chester, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Fentress, Grainger, Grundy, Hancock, Haywood, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lauderdale, Lewis, Macon, Marion, Meigs, Moore, Morgan, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Union, Van Buren, Wayne, Weakley

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top