Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 69.7 (68.9, 70.5) N/A 6,102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Anderson County 6 69.8 (63.0, 77.2) 74 (39, 90) 81 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Bedford County 6 76.7 (66.9, 87.6) 57 (16, 87) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 1.0)
Benton County 6 96.6 (80.6, 115.5) 13 (1, 68) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.5)
Bledsoe County 6 77.3 (61.8, 96.4) 55 (5, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.9)
Blount County 6 75.7 (70.4, 81.4) 60 (31, 80) 155 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Bradley County 6 63.9 (58.1, 70.2) 87 (60, 93) 91 falling falling trend -10.2 (-21.9, -0.1)
Campbell County 6 104.4 (93.1, 116.8) 6 (1, 29) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Cannon County 6 73.3 (57.3, 92.9) 68 (9, 94) 15 stable stable trend 11.3 (-2.1, 22.6)
Carroll County 6 88.7 (76.2, 103.0) 23 (4, 75) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.7)
Carter County 6 69.0 (61.3, 77.4) 76 (37, 92) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.6)
Cheatham County 6 71.5 (61.0, 83.4) 70 (21, 93) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.8)
Chester County 6 82.3 (66.5, 101.0) 39 (4, 91) 19 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 7.1)
Claiborne County 6 99.5 (87.1, 113.5) 11 (1, 46) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Clay County 6 67.5 (49.8, 91.6) 81 (10, 94) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-12.3, 10.8)
Cocke County 6 85.8 (75.2, 97.6) 30 (7, 76) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.6)
Coffee County 6 78.3 (69.4, 88.2) 48 (17, 85) 58 rising rising trend 14.1 (6.4, 21.4)
Crockett County 6 90.7 (72.6, 112.3) 19 (2, 88) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.5)
Cumberland County 6 62.4 (56.0, 69.6) 90 (60, 94) 79 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Davidson County 6 58.9 (56.4, 61.6) 91 (82, 93) 414 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -2.0)
DeKalb County 6 86.0 (71.4, 103.0) 29 (3, 87) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.3)
Decatur County 6 101.5 (82.3, 124.7) 8 (1, 70) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.3)
Dickson County 6 83.6 (74.0, 94.1) 34 (10, 80) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.9)
Dyer County 6 92.1 (80.5, 105.2) 17 (3, 64) 47 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.5)
Fayette County 6 54.8 (47.2, 63.5) 93 (74, 94) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.6)
Fentress County 6 79.1 (65.0, 95.9) 46 (7, 92) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.2)
Franklin County 6 71.4 (62.1, 81.9) 71 (23, 92) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Gibson County 6 76.1 (67.1, 86.1) 58 (18, 87) 53 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.3, 1.5)
Giles County 6 77.6 (66.3, 90.6) 54 (12, 89) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.3)
Grainger County 6 95.0 (81.0, 111.1) 14 (1, 64) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.4)
Greene County 6 77.7 (70.4, 85.6) 53 (21, 82) 87 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Grundy County 6 82.5 (65.9, 102.6) 38 (4, 92) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-14.3, 1.3)
Hamblen County 6 79.2 (71.1, 88.1) 44 (18, 80) 72 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.9)
Hamilton County 6 62.7 (59.5, 66.0) 89 (73, 92) 307 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Hancock County 6 123.4 (92.2, 162.7) 1 (1, 65) 12 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.0, 6.2)
Hardeman County 6 75.7 (63.3, 90.1) 59 (12, 92) 27 stable stable trend -8.7 (-25.5, 1.1)
Hardin County 6 80.0 (68.2, 93.7) 42 (9, 88) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Hawkins County 6 93.9 (85.0, 103.6) 16 (4, 47) 85 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 0.8)
Haywood County 6 75.1 (60.7, 92.2) 63 (9, 94) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.9)
Henderson County 6 84.5 (72.0, 98.8) 31 (4, 84) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 2.0)
Henry County 6 73.4 (63.4, 84.8) 67 (19, 92) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Hickman County 6 104.7 (89.6, 121.9) 5 (1, 46) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.5)
Houston County 6 99.6 (76.2, 129.2) 10 (1, 89) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.6)
Humphreys County 6 87.7 (72.7, 105.5) 25 (3, 84) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.2)
Jackson County 6 90.7 (72.3, 113.4) 18 (2, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.6)
Jefferson County 6 79.3 (70.7, 88.8) 43 (17, 81) 65 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.9)
Johnson County 6 75.1 (61.6, 91.5) 62 (10, 93) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.8, 5.9)
Knox County 6 67.3 (64.3, 70.4) 83 (64, 88) 390 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.2)
Lake County 6 116.7 (86.7, 154.7) 3 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.0, 7.6)
Lauderdale County 6 82.1 (68.6, 97.8) 40 (5, 88) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.8)
Lawrence County 6 87.1 (76.7, 98.7) 26 (7, 72) 52 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Lewis County 6 77.9 (60.8, 99.1) 50 (4, 94) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 2.2)
Lincoln County 6 58.5 (49.3, 69.1) 92 (56, 94) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.2, -0.1)
Loudon County 6 68.8 (61.4, 77.1) 77 (38, 92) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.1)
Macon County 6 100.3 (84.8, 117.9) 9 (1, 59) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.1)
Madison County 6 62.8 (56.7, 69.4) 88 (60, 94) 82 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Marion County 6 87.0 (74.7, 101.0) 27 (4, 80) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.3)
Marshall County 6 88.2 (75.9, 102.0) 24 (4, 78) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Maury County 6 77.0 (70.0, 84.5) 56 (24, 82) 95 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.4)
McMinn County 6 80.8 (72.2, 90.3) 41 (15, 80) 66 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
McNairy County 6 79.2 (67.2, 93.0) 45 (10, 90) 32 stable stable trend -11.2 (-24.0, 3.3)
Meigs County 6 89.5 (70.2, 113.1) 21 (1, 89) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-17.1, 2.6)
Monroe County 6 96.6 (86.5, 107.6) 12 (3, 43) 71 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Montgomery County 6 72.9 (66.9, 79.2) 69 (35, 84) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.2, -0.3)
Moore County 6 69.1 (48.0, 98.3) 75 (4, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.6, 5.2)
Morgan County 6 78.6 (64.9, 94.7) 47 (8, 92) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Obion County 6 82.5 (71.1, 95.5) 37 (8, 82) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.2)
Overton County 6 86.8 (73.3, 102.5) 28 (4, 82) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.3)
Perry County 6 83.6 (62.3, 111.2) 33 (1, 94) 11 falling falling trend -18.6 (-28.3, -9.4)
Pickett County 6 68.3 (46.8, 100.1) 79 (5, 95) 7 stable stable trend -4.7 (-33.0, 5.0)
Polk County 6 89.1 (73.3, 107.8) 22 (3, 85) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.1)
Putnam County 6 71.2 (63.9, 79.2) 72 (34, 90) 71 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Rhea County 6 104.3 (91.4, 118.7) 7 (1, 38) 49 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Roane County 6 73.7 (65.8, 82.3) 65 (25, 89) 68 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Robertson County 6 82.7 (74.1, 92.0) 35 (12, 76) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Rutherford County 6 68.6 (64.3, 73.1) 78 (54, 88) 201 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Scott County 6 94.0 (78.6, 111.7) 15 (1, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Sequatchie County 6 67.5 (53.1, 85.3) 82 (17, 94) 16 stable stable trend -5.0 (-20.2, 0.3)
Sevier County 6 75.1 (68.9, 81.9) 61 (28, 83) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Shelby County 6 54.7 (52.7, 56.8) 94 (89, 94) 567 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.1, -0.7)
Smith County 6 90.6 (74.8, 109.1) 20 (2, 83) 24 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.0, 0.6)
Stewart County 6 82.6 (65.8, 103.1) 36 (3, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.2)
Sullivan County 6 74.3 (69.5, 79.4) 64 (36, 80) 189 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Sumner County 6 68.1 (63.3, 73.1) 80 (54, 89) 160 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Tipton County 6 77.8 (68.8, 87.7) 51 (16, 85) 57 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.9)
Trousdale County 6 121.7 (93.9, 155.2) 2 (1, 59) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.1)
Unicoi County 6 64.0 (51.5, 79.3) 85 (26, 94) 19 falling falling trend -4.5 (-19.4, -0.8)
Union County 6 111.6 (94.3, 131.6) 4 (1, 34) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.9)
Van Buren County 6 73.5 (51.4, 104.2) 66 (3, 95) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 5.6)
Warren County 6 83.9 (73.5, 95.6) 32 (8, 79) 48 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 3.0)
Washington County 6 64.4 (59.2, 70.0) 84 (63, 92) 117 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.4, -0.1)
Wayne County 6 77.7 (62.7, 95.8) 52 (7, 94) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-18.7, 1.9)
Weakley County 6 78.0 (66.8, 90.8) 49 (12, 90) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.1)
White County 6 70.3 (59.2, 83.2) 73 (20, 94) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Williamson County 6 37.7 (34.2, 41.4) 95 (94, 95) 93 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Wilson County 6 64.0 (58.7, 69.6) 86 (62, 93) 114 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/22/2024 1:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top