Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 *** 74.0 (73.2, 74.8) N/A 6,147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Williamson County 6 *** 40.5 (36.7, 44.6) 95 (93, 95) 89 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.2)
Moore County 6 *** 56.9 (37.5, 84.8) 94 (23, 95) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.4, 3.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 59.3 (57.1, 61.6) 93 (87, 94) 587 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Lincoln County 6 *** 59.6 (50.2, 70.5) 92 (60, 94) 29 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.4)
Cannon County 6 *** 62.2 (47.3, 81.0) 91 (33, 95) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Clay County 6 *** 65.0 (47.1, 89.2) 90 (18, 95) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Davidson County 6 *** 65.0 (62.2, 67.9) 89 (78, 93) 434 falling falling trend -6.2 (-8.5, -3.9)
Unicoi County 6 *** 65.3 (52.7, 80.6) 88 (31, 94) 20 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.7, -1.2)
Fayette County 6 *** 65.3 (56.7, 75.1) 87 (51, 94) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Wilson County 6 *** 66.9 (61.3, 73.0) 86 (61, 93) 108 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.3)
Cumberland County 6 *** 68.1 (60.9, 76.0) 85 (48, 93) 77 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Haywood County 6 *** 68.8 (54.6, 85.9) 84 (23, 94) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 4.8)
Carter County 6 *** 69.0 (61.3, 77.5) 83 (46, 94) 61 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Knox County 6 *** 69.3 (66.1, 72.5) 82 (65, 90) 381 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 4.9)
Hamilton County 6 *** 69.3 (65.9, 72.9) 81 (65, 90) 322 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Sumner County 6 *** 70.5 (65.5, 75.8) 80 (53, 91) 154 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.1)
Washington County 6 *** 71.3 (65.6, 77.3) 79 (49, 91) 121 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Coffee County 6 *** 71.6 (62.9, 81.2) 78 (37, 93) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Rutherford County 6 *** 72.6 (67.9, 77.4) 77 (50, 88) 194 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Madison County 6 *** 72.6 (66.0, 79.9) 76 (42, 91) 90 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Bradley County 6 *** 73.3 (66.9, 80.2) 75 (40, 91) 98 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Anderson County 6 *** 73.6 (66.5, 81.3) 74 (38, 91) 83 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Loudon County 6 *** 74.1 (66.0, 83.1) 73 (34, 91) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.0)
Chester County 6 *** 74.6 (59.2, 93.0) 72 (14, 94) 17 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.6, 6.6)
Putnam County 6 *** 75.1 (67.4, 83.5) 71 (31, 90) 71 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Smith County 6 *** 75.4 (60.6, 93.0) 70 (12, 94) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.4)
Henry County 6 *** 75.7 (65.6, 87.3) 69 (22, 92) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Roane County 6 *** 75.8 (67.7, 84.7) 68 (30, 90) 68 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Montgomery County 6 *** 76.1 (69.9, 82.7) 67 (35, 88) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Giles County 6 *** 76.3 (65.0, 89.3) 66 (18, 92) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Pickett County 6 *** 77.4 (54.1, 110.9) 65 (2, 95) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.5)
Jefferson County 6 *** 77.9 (69.1, 87.6) 64 (26, 89) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Johnson County 6 *** 77.9 (63.9, 94.7) 63 (13, 94) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.3, 5.6)
McMinn County 6 *** 77.9 (69.3, 87.5) 62 (24, 89) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Bedford County 6 *** 78.1 (68.0, 89.4) 61 (21, 91) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Sullivan County 6 *** 78.3 (73.3, 83.5) 60 (35, 79) 192 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Warren County 6 *** 78.8 (68.5, 90.3) 59 (20, 90) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
White County 6 *** 78.9 (66.7, 92.9) 58 (15, 92) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Weakley County 6 *** 79.1 (67.7, 92.1) 57 (13, 91) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 79.6 (69.6, 90.9) 56 (19, 89) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Sequatchie County 6 *** 79.7 (63.3, 99.6) 55 (6, 94) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.6)
Sevier County 6 *** 80.1 (73.5, 87.3) 54 (27, 82) 113 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Greene County 6 *** 80.3 (72.7, 88.7) 53 (23, 83) 86 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
DeKalb County 6 *** 80.7 (66.1, 97.9) 52 (8, 93) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.2)
Blount County 6 *** 80.7 (75.0, 86.8) 51 (29, 77) 154 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Tipton County 6 *** 81.3 (71.9, 91.7) 50 (16, 85) 57 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Hamblen County 6 *** 81.5 (73.1, 90.6) 49 (20, 85) 71 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Hardin County 6 *** 81.7 (69.6, 95.8) 48 (12, 91) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Henderson County 6 *** 82.2 (69.7, 96.5) 47 (12, 90) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.6)
Grundy County 6 *** 82.7 (65.9, 103.1) 46 (5, 94) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.5)
Gibson County 6 *** 82.8 (73.3, 93.3) 45 (15, 85) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Maury County 6 *** 83.6 (76.0, 91.8) 44 (19, 75) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Van Buren County 6 *** 83.6 (58.2, 118.3) 43 (1, 94) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.1)
Stewart County 6 *** 83.7 (66.6, 104.5) 42 (5, 93) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Bledsoe County 6 *** 86.3 (69.3, 106.9) 41 (3, 91) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Robertson County 6 *** 86.3 (77.3, 96.1) 40 (14, 76) 70 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 86.4 (71.8, 103.3) 39 (6, 90) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Cheatham County 6 *** 87.1 (75.1, 100.5) 38 (8, 85) 42 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Obion County 6 *** 87.5 (75.5, 101.1) 37 (6, 83) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Lawrence County 6 *** 87.5 (77.0, 99.3) 36 (8, 78) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Lewis County 6 *** 87.8 (68.9, 110.9) 35 (2, 93) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1)
Humphreys County 6 *** 88.7 (73.5, 106.5) 34 (4, 89) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.9)
Crockett County 6 *** 88.7 (70.7, 110.4) 33 (2, 93) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.9)
Cocke County 6 *** 89.0 (77.8, 101.6) 32 (7, 77) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Dickson County 6 *** 89.4 (79.3, 100.6) 31 (9, 73) 58 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Marshall County 6 *** 89.9 (77.1, 104.2) 30 (5, 82) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Wayne County 6 *** 89.9 (73.6, 109.2) 29 (2, 88) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.5)
Dyer County 6 *** 90.5 (78.9, 103.5) 28 (5, 76) 45 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Grainger County 6 *** 90.6 (76.7, 106.7) 27 (4, 80) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.3)
Marion County 6 *** 90.9 (78.2, 105.2) 26 (5, 79) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Lauderdale County 6 *** 91.7 (77.2, 108.3) 25 (3, 82) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.0)
Macon County 6 *** 93.2 (78.2, 110.6) 24 (2, 80) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Hardeman County 6 *** 93.6 (79.3, 110.0) 23 (3, 76) 32 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 4.8)
Monroe County 6 *** 95.0 (84.9, 106.2) 22 (5, 60) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Fentress County 6 *** 95.4 (79.4, 114.2) 21 (2, 85) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
McNairy County 6 *** 95.8 (82.4, 111.0) 20 (3, 71) 38 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.7)
Houston County 6 *** 96.6 (72.9, 126.4) 19 (1, 92) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 5.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 97.7 (78.6, 120.9) 18 (1, 86) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Lake County 6 *** 98.9 (72.0, 133.5) 17 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.3)
Decatur County 6 *** 99.4 (79.7, 123.3) 16 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Hawkins County 6 *** 101.2 (91.7, 111.5) 15 (3, 40) 87 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.8)
Scott County 6 *** 102.0 (85.8, 120.7) 14 (1, 64) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Benton County 6 *** 102.9 (86.3, 122.4) 13 (1, 60) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Rhea County 6 *** 103.1 (90.1, 117.7) 12 (1, 48) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1)
Meigs County 6 *** 103.9 (82.5, 129.7) 11 (1, 81) 18 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 6.2)
Overton County 6 *** 104.1 (89.2, 121.3) 10 (1, 57) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Polk County 6 *** 104.9 (87.3, 125.5) 9 (1, 63) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.6)
Hickman County 6 *** 105.0 (89.7, 122.4) 8 (1, 51) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.0)
Carroll County 6 *** 108.1 (94.0, 123.9) 7 (1, 42) 44 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.8)
Perry County 6 *** 110.0 (85.0, 141.2) 6 (1, 73) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Campbell County 6 *** 111.2 (99.5, 124.0) 5 (1, 28) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Claiborne County 6 *** 111.4 (97.9, 126.3) 4 (1, 29) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Union County 6 *** 115.5 (97.2, 136.5) 3 (1, 38) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Trousdale County 6 *** 119.8 (91.3, 154.5) 2 (1, 71) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.3)
Hancock County 6 *** 125.9 (94.6, 165.2) 1 (1, 63) 12 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.8, 6.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/01/2022 11:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top