Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 68.1 (67.3, 68.9) N/A 6,049 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -3.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Anderson County 6 Urban 74.7 (67.7, 82.3) 57 (23, 82) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Blount County 6 Urban 74.5 (69.2, 80.0) 58 (29, 77) 155 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Bradley County 6 Urban 64.2 (58.4, 70.5) 84 (56, 92) 92 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Campbell County 6 Urban 107.9 (96.4, 120.6) 5 (1, 22) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Cannon County 6 Urban 73.2 (57.1, 93.0) 63 (7, 94) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.3)
Carter County 6 Urban 68.2 (60.6, 76.5) 70 (37, 91) 63 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -1.0)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 77.5 (66.5, 89.8) 49 (11, 87) 39 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.2)
Chester County 6 Urban 74.2 (59.1, 92.3) 60 (8, 94) 17 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 6.3)
Crockett County 6 Urban 88.0 (69.9, 109.7) 20 (1, 89) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7)
Davidson County 6 Urban 55.4 (52.9, 57.9) 91 (85, 94) 401 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.9, -2.9)
Dickson County 6 Urban 87.7 (77.9, 98.4) 23 (5, 63) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Fayette County 6 Urban 53.9 (46.3, 62.6) 93 (70, 94) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 2.0)
Gibson County 6 Urban 77.0 (67.9, 87.0) 51 (14, 84) 54 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.3, 0.2)
Grainger County 6 Urban 94.2 (80.6, 109.9) 11 (2, 63) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 2.0)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 74.9 (67.0, 83.5) 56 (21, 83) 67 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 62.4 (59.3, 65.7) 87 (70, 90) 308 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 89.8 (81.1, 99.3) 15 (6, 52) 82 falling falling trend -3.6 (-11.8, -0.3)
Hickman County 6 Urban 105.5 (90.4, 122.8) 6 (1, 44) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 80.1 (71.6, 89.6) 39 (12, 76) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Knox County 6 Urban 65.9 (63.0, 69.0) 80 (62, 87) 389 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -2.4)
Loudon County 6 Urban 66.6 (59.4, 74.7) 78 (38, 91) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Macon County 6 Urban 87.4 (73.2, 103.7) 24 (3, 78) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Madison County 6 Urban 60.8 (54.8, 67.3) 89 (62, 94) 79 falling falling trend -4.8 (-13.9, -0.7)
Marion County 6 Urban 81.4 (69.5, 94.9) 35 (8, 82) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Maury County 6 Urban 70.6 (64.2, 77.6) 68 (33, 88) 93 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 71.1 (65.3, 77.2) 67 (36, 87) 122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.6)
Morgan County 6 Urban 78.0 (64.1, 94.3) 46 (7, 90) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Polk County 6 Urban 74.2 (60.2, 91.1) 59 (8, 93) 20 falling falling trend -19.2 (-29.0, -3.1)
Roane County 6 Urban 72.1 (64.3, 80.8) 66 (25, 88) 66 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Robertson County 6 Urban 81.1 (72.6, 90.3) 36 (12, 73) 70 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 64.9 (60.8, 69.3) 83 (60, 90) 197 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Sequatchie County 6 Urban 67.6 (53.4, 85.1) 73 (12, 94) 17 falling falling trend -5.0 (-18.2, -1.0)
Shelby County 6 Urban 54.5 (52.4, 56.6) 92 (87, 94) 564 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.7, -1.4)
Smith County 6 Urban 85.8 (70.4, 103.8) 27 (3, 87) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.4, 0.6)
Stewart County 6 Urban 86.0 (68.7, 107.1) 26 (2, 90) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 73.5 (68.8, 78.5) 62 (34, 77) 188 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Sumner County 6 Urban 65.7 (61.2, 70.6) 81 (56, 89) 160 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Tipton County 6 Urban 83.5 (74.1, 93.8) 29 (8, 72) 60 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.6)
Trousdale County 6 Urban 122.0 (94.5, 155.2) 1 (1, 47) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.6)
Unicoi County 6 Urban 69.1 (56.0, 84.9) 69 (14, 94) 21 stable stable trend 6.7 (-6.4, 21.5)
Union County 6 Urban 114.2 (96.7, 134.2) 2 (1, 26) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 3.1)
Washington County 6 Urban 63.0 (57.9, 68.5) 85 (61, 91) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.1, -0.3)
Williamson County 6 Urban 38.3 (34.9, 42.0) 95 (94, 95) 99 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -1.9)
Wilson County 6 Urban 61.0 (55.9, 66.4) 88 (67, 93) 111 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.4)
Bedford County 6 Rural 76.4 (66.6, 87.2) 52 (13, 86) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Benton County 6 Rural 89.0 (73.5, 107.4) 18 (2, 77) 25 falling falling trend -14.0 (-27.7, -0.7)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural 77.9 (62.4, 96.8) 47 (6, 93) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.3)
Carroll County 6 Rural 87.8 (75.3, 102.1) 22 (4, 75) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 97.6 (85.3, 111.5) 9 (1, 47) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Clay County 6 Rural 67.1 (49.4, 91.3) 76 (7, 95) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.1)
Cocke County 6 Rural 78.1 (68.1, 89.4) 45 (13, 85) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.5)
Coffee County 6 Rural 80.1 (71.1, 89.9) 41 (12, 78) 60 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 62.9 (56.5, 70.0) 86 (55, 93) 81 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 94.2 (78.8, 112.0) 12 (1, 73) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 3.1)
Decatur County 6 Rural 104.6 (85.3, 128.1) 7 (1, 62) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Dyer County 6 Rural 86.1 (74.8, 98.7) 25 (6, 72) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Fentress County 6 Rural 81.8 (67.9, 98.3) 33 (5, 88) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Franklin County 6 Rural 67.9 (58.9, 78.1) 71 (30, 92) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Giles County 6 Rural 78.7 (67.7, 91.3) 44 (10, 87) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 75.3 (68.1, 83.2) 54 (22, 82) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Grundy County 6 Rural 74.1 (58.5, 93.1) 61 (8, 94) 16 falling falling trend -2.7 (-13.6, -0.3)
Hancock County 6 Rural 112.3 (82.8, 149.9) 4 (1, 83) 11 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.4)
Hardeman County 6 Rural 76.3 (64.0, 90.6) 53 (9, 90) 28 stable stable trend -5.4 (-22.3, 0.9)
Hardin County 6 Rural 80.2 (68.5, 93.6) 38 (7, 85) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Haywood County 6 Rural 66.2 (53.3, 81.8) 79 (19, 94) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 4.1)
Henderson County 6 Rural 77.8 (65.9, 91.5) 48 (9, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.5)
Henry County 6 Rural 77.2 (66.9, 89.0) 50 (12, 86) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Houston County 6 Rural 87.8 (66.0, 115.7) 21 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.9)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 89.2 (74.0, 107.0) 16 (3, 77) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 112.4 (91.6, 137.5) 3 (1, 43) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.2)
Johnson County 6 Rural 66.8 (54.1, 82.2) 77 (20, 94) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.7, 5.6)
Lake County 6 Rural 99.2 (71.4, 135.4) 8 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.6, 6.4)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 75.0 (62.2, 90.0) 55 (11, 91) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 81.8 (71.7, 93.0) 32 (9, 78) 49 falling falling trend -10.6 (-18.5, -1.0)
Lewis County 6 Rural 80.1 (63.3, 100.8) 40 (4, 93) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 2.0)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 51.4 (42.9, 61.4) 94 (71, 95) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.2, -0.6)
Marshall County 6 Rural 88.5 (76.1, 102.3) 19 (4, 74) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.2)
McMinn County 6 Rural 81.7 (72.9, 91.3) 34 (11, 71) 66 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.8)
McNairy County 6 Rural 72.7 (61.2, 86.0) 64 (14, 93) 29 falling falling trend -20.1 (-29.9, -11.1)
Meigs County 6 Rural 84.2 (66.3, 106.1) 28 (3, 91) 17 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.7, 0.9)
Monroe County 6 Rural 94.1 (84.1, 105.2) 13 (3, 47) 68 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Moore County 6 Rural 59.2 (40.2, 86.2) 90 (11, 95) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 4.4)
Obion County 6 Rural 82.2 (70.8, 95.2) 31 (7, 81) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Overton County 6 Rural 80.3 (67.4, 95.4) 37 (5, 89) 28 stable stable trend -12.9 (-39.4, 1.8)
Perry County 6 Rural 67.5 (49.2, 91.6) 74 (7, 95) 9 falling falling trend -16.4 (-30.5, -10.8)
Pickett County 6 Rural 79.9 (55.0, 115.5) 42 (1, 94) 8 stable stable trend -4.4 (-38.2, 0.1)
Putnam County 6 Rural 65.7 (58.6, 73.5) 82 (45, 92) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Rhea County 6 Rural 94.2 (82.0, 108.0) 10 (2, 57) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Scott County 6 Rural 91.0 (75.8, 108.7) 14 (2, 77) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Sevier County 6 Rural 72.3 (66.2, 78.9) 65 (30, 84) 109 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 67.3 (46.9, 96.1) 75 (4, 95) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 5.5)
Warren County 6 Rural 89.0 (78.2, 101.1) 17 (4, 64) 50 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.9)
Wayne County 6 Rural 82.3 (66.7, 101.0) 30 (4, 89) 20 stable stable trend -2.1 (-15.5, 0.5)
Weakley County 6 Rural 78.8 (67.3, 91.9) 43 (9, 87) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
White County 6 Rural 67.8 (56.8, 80.6) 72 (23, 94) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top