Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Cervix (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 7.6 (7.2, 8.0) N/A 275 falling falling trend -5.7 (-11.1, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 7.5 (7.5, 7.6) N/A 12,670 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.5)
Shelby County 6 Urban 7.9 (6.8, 9.1) 13 (7, 18) 39 falling falling trend -3.9 (-15.0, -1.4)
Davidson County 6 Urban 6.3 (5.2, 7.6) 19 (11, 22) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Knox County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.2) 16 (9, 22) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.2)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 6.5 (4.9, 8.4) 17 (9, 22) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 0.9)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 6.9 (5.2, 8.9) 15 (7, 22) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 5.3)
Sumner County 6 Urban 8.4 (6.0, 11.4) 12 (3, 21) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.5)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 7.1 (4.9, 10.0) 14 (5, 22) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.7, 0.7)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 8.5 (5.7, 12.1) 11 (3, 21) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.0)
Madison County 6 Urban 10.8 (7.3, 15.4) 7 (1, 19) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.3, 3.5)
Blount County 6 Urban 9.3 (6.1, 13.4) 10 (2, 21) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 7.6)
Maury County 6 Urban 9.9 (6.3, 14.7) 9 (1, 21) 5
*
*
Sevier County 6 Rural 10.9 (6.9, 16.3) 5 (1, 20) 5
*
*
Williamson County 6 Urban 4.2 (2.7, 6.3) 22 (16, 22) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.6)
Anderson County 6 Urban 11.0 (6.8, 16.8) 4 (1, 21) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-6.0, 10.5)
Wilson County 6 Urban 5.9 (3.7, 8.9) 21 (7, 22) 5 falling falling trend -13.7 (-34.2, -2.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 6.2 (3.8, 9.6) 20 (6, 22) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.7, 4.6)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 15.5 (9.1, 24.6) 1 (1, 17) 4
*
*
Bradley County 6 Urban 6.4 (3.8, 10.1) 18 (5, 22) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-9.0, 4.0)
Coffee County 6 Rural 12.8 (7.5, 20.3) 2 (1, 20) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Urban 12.6 (7.2, 20.6) 3 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Dickson County 6 Urban 10.9 (6.2, 18.0) 6 (1, 21) 3
*
*
Hawkins County 6 Urban 10.7 (5.8, 17.9) 8 (1, 22) 3
*
*
Bedford County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheatham County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cocke County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dyer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gibson County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamblen County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loudon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMinn County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McNairy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Obion County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rhea County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bedford, Benton, Bledsoe, Campbell, Cannon, Carroll, Carter, Cheatham, Chester, Claiborne, Clay, Cocke, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Dyer, Fayette, Fentress, Franklin, Gibson, Giles, Grainger, Greene, Grundy, Hamblen, Hancock, Hardeman, Hardin, Haywood, Henderson, Henry, Hickman, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lauderdale, Lawrence, Lewis, Lincoln, Loudon, Macon, Marion, Marshall, McMinn, McNairy, Meigs, Monroe, Moore, Morgan, Obion, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Putnam, Rhea, Roane, Robertson, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Tipton, Trousdale, Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Warren, Wayne, Weakley, White

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top