Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee 6 | 25.2 (24.5, 25.8) | N/A | 1,135 | rising | 2.5 (2.2, 2.9) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) | N/A | 56,871 | rising | 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) |
Lincoln County 6 | 13.5 (7.8, 22.3) | 71 (38, 71) | 4 | stable | 0.8 (-4.2, 7.2) |
Franklin County 6 | 17.4 (10.8, 26.7) | 70 (17, 71) | 5 | stable | 4.4 (-1.4, 12.5) |
Campbell County 6 | 19.0 (12.0, 28.7) | 69 (12, 71) | 5 | stable | 0.2 (-2.7, 3.4) |
Carter County 6 | 19.4 (13.8, 26.9) | 68 (17, 71) | 9 | stable | 0.6 (-2.9, 4.7) |
Henderson County 6 | 19.6 (11.2, 32.0) | 67 (6, 71) | 4 |
|
|
White County 6 | 19.8 (11.4, 32.5) | 66 (6, 71) | 4 | falling | -15.5 (-37.4, -5.4) |
Loudon County 6 | 19.9 (14.0, 27.8) | 65 (14, 71) | 9 | stable | -1.3 (-6.1, 4.1) |
Cheatham County 6 | 19.9 (12.9, 29.8) | 64 (9, 71) | 5 |
|
|
Hamblen County 6 | 20.1 (14.5, 27.4) | 63 (15, 71) | 9 | stable | 0.6 (-4.5, 6.4) |
Jefferson County 6 | 20.5 (14.8, 28.1) | 62 (15, 71) | 9 |
|
|
Henry County 6 | 20.9 (13.2, 32.0) | 61 (6, 71) | 5 | stable | 1.6 (-3.7, 8.1) |
Haywood County 6 | 20.9 (12.1, 35.4) | 60 (4, 71) | 3 | stable | -1.1 (-7.3, 6.0) |
Dyer County 6 | 21.2 (13.5, 31.8) | 59 (6, 71) | 5 | stable | 1.3 (-2.9, 6.3) |
Knox County 6 | 21.2 (18.9, 23.7) | 58 (35, 67) | 65 | rising | 1.9 (0.4, 3.6) |
Grainger County 6 | 21.4 (12.3, 35.5) | 57 (3, 71) | 4 |
|
|
Fayette County 6 | 22.4 (15.5, 31.7) | 56 (7, 71) | 8 | stable | 0.0 (-3.6, 4.4) |
Sumner County 6 | 22.5 (18.8, 26.7) | 55 (22, 68) | 28 | rising | 2.4 (0.2, 5.3) |
Cumberland County 6 | 22.6 (17.1, 29.8) | 54 (12, 70) | 14 | stable | -0.9 (-3.2, 1.8) |
Rutherford County 6 | 22.7 (19.5, 26.2) | 53 (24, 67) | 38 | stable | 1.8 (-0.2, 4.3) |
Williamson County 6 | 22.9 (19.4, 26.9) | 52 (22, 67) | 33 | stable | -4.5 (-22.0, 2.2) |
Hamilton County 6 | 23.1 (20.4, 26.0) | 51 (26, 64) | 59 | stable | 1.0 (-0.4, 2.6) |
Anderson County 6 | 23.3 (17.8, 30.0) | 50 (10, 70) | 14 | stable | 3.3 (-3.1, 10.9) |
Morgan County 6 | 23.6 (13.0, 40.1) | 49 (1, 71) | 3 | rising | 4.9 (0.8, 10.5) |
Robertson County 6 | 23.6 (17.7, 31.0) | 48 (9, 70) | 11 | stable | 1.3 (-1.1, 4.4) |
Wilson County 6 | 23.9 (19.6, 29.0) | 47 (13, 67) | 23 | rising | 2.5 (0.3, 5.4) |
Unicoi County 6 | 24.0 (13.8, 40.5) | 46 (1, 71) | 3 | stable | 2.7 (-3.3, 9.6) |
Union County 6 | 24.1 (13.5, 40.5) | 45 (1, 71) | 3 | stable | 0.7 (-4.9, 7.8) |
Monroe County 6 | 24.1 (16.6, 34.2) | 44 (5, 71) | 8 | stable | 2.7 (-0.9, 7.2) |
Giles County 6 | 24.4 (15.7, 36.7) | 43 (2, 71) | 6 | rising | 4.8 (0.3, 10.9) |
Dickson County 6 | 24.4 (17.4, 33.5) | 42 (5, 70) | 8 | rising | 4.4 (1.5, 8.5) |
Blount County 6 | 24.5 (20.1, 29.5) | 41 (12, 66) | 25 | rising | 2.5 (0.2, 5.3) |
Hawkins County 6 | 24.5 (17.6, 33.3) | 40 (5, 70) | 9 | stable | 0.5 (-2.7, 4.0) |
Polk County 6 | 24.7 (13.7, 42.6) | 39 (1, 71) | 3 |
|
|
Marion County 6 | 25.0 (15.2, 39.1) | 38 (2, 71) | 5 | stable | 4.9 (-1.3, 12.8) |
Overton County 6 | 25.1 (14.9, 40.3) | 37 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
Montgomery County 6 | 25.7 (21.3, 30.8) | 36 (10, 63) | 25 | stable | -6.8 (-17.7, 2.1) |
Weakley County 6 | 25.9 (16.4, 39.0) | 35 (1, 71) | 5 | stable | 0.9 (-3.2, 5.3) |
Hickman County 6 | 25.9 (15.8, 40.7) | 34 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
Davidson County 6 | 25.9 (23.7, 28.3) | 33 (17, 52) | 104 | rising | 8.0 (2.4, 12.2) |
Washington County 6 | 26.1 (21.4, 31.5) | 32 (8, 64) | 24 | rising | 2.8 (0.5, 5.8) |
Marshall County 6 | 26.1 (17.1, 38.3) | 31 (2, 71) | 6 | stable | 2.1 (-1.9, 7.4) |
Gibson County 6 | 26.3 (18.9, 35.8) | 30 (3, 70) | 9 | stable | 0.7 (-2.8, 4.7) |
Carroll County 6 | 26.8 (16.8, 41.0) | 29 (1, 71) | 5 | stable | 1.0 (-2.8, 5.1) |
Shelby County 6 | 27.1 (25.2, 29.1) | 28 (15, 45) | 159 | rising | 3.3 (2.2, 4.6) |
Fentress County 6 | 27.2 (15.6, 45.1) | 27 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
Madison County 6 | 27.5 (22.0, 34.1) | 26 (5, 63) | 19 | stable | 1.5 (-1.2, 4.6) |
Lawrence County 6 | 27.9 (20.0, 38.2) | 25 (2, 69) | 9 |
|
|
Bradley County 6 | 28.2 (22.9, 34.4) | 24 (4, 60) | 21 | stable | 2.4 (-0.8, 6.4) |
Bedford County 6 | 28.2 (20.1, 38.6) | 23 (2, 69) | 9 | rising | 5.7 (1.8, 11.6) |
Coffee County 6 | 28.3 (20.9, 37.5) | 22 (2, 67) | 11 | stable | -0.8 (-19.0, 2.7) |
Tipton County 6 | 28.9 (21.5, 38.1) | 21 (2, 68) | 11 | stable | 3.4 (-0.2, 8.0) |
Roane County 6 | 29.0 (21.9, 38.1) | 20 (2, 66) | 13 | rising | 3.5 (0.3, 7.4) |
McNairy County 6 | 29.0 (18.0, 44.6) | 19 (1, 71) | 5 | stable | 0.0 (-4.6, 4.8) |
McMinn County 6 | 29.1 (21.5, 38.8) | 18 (2, 67) | 11 | stable | 0.6 (-3.8, 5.8) |
Hardeman County 6 | 30.1 (19.0, 45.9) | 17 (1, 70) | 5 | stable | 1.6 (-3.2, 7.8) |
Sullivan County 6 | 30.2 (25.8, 35.1) | 16 (4, 45) | 38 | rising | 3.2 (0.5, 6.5) |
Rhea County 6 | 30.2 (20.5, 43.3) | 15 (1, 69) | 7 | stable | 2.6 (-2.6, 9.1) |
Greene County 6 | 30.3 (23.6, 38.4) | 14 (2, 61) | 16 | stable | 2.2 (-2.5, 8.3) |
Hardin County 6 | 30.5 (19.0, 46.7) | 13 (1, 70) | 5 | stable | 1.8 (-4.3, 8.8) |
Sevier County 6 | 31.0 (25.0, 38.1) | 12 (2, 53) | 22 | rising | 3.6 (1.6, 6.1) |
Obion County 6 | 31.3 (20.8, 45.6) | 11 (1, 69) | 6 | rising | 5.2 (0.3, 11.6) |
Maury County 6 | 32.6 (26.4, 39.9) | 10 (1, 48) | 21 | rising | 5.0 (2.4, 8.6) |
Lauderdale County 6 | 32.8 (21.8, 48.1) | 9 (1, 68) | 6 | rising | 5.3 (0.7, 11.9) |
Putnam County 6 | 33.9 (26.6, 42.5) | 8 (1, 49) | 16 | stable | 3.8 (-0.1, 9.3) |
Benton County 6 | 33.9 (19.5, 55.7) | 7 (1, 70) | 4 |
|
|
Decatur County 6 | 35.0 (19.5, 60.1) | 6 (1, 71) | 3 |
|
|
Claiborne County 6 | 36.1 (25.4, 50.4) | 5 (1, 63) | 8 | rising | 5.4 (1.2, 11.3) |
Macon County 6 | 36.3 (23.7, 53.5) | 4 (1, 66) | 6 |
|
|
Cocke County 6 | 37.6 (27.0, 51.4) | 3 (1, 56) | 10 | rising | 5.6 (2.8, 9.2) |
Chester County 6 | 38.7 (24.1, 59.6) | 2 (1, 68) | 5 |
|
|
Smith County 6 | 38.9 (25.1, 58.2) | 1 (1, 67) | 5 | rising | 5.1 (1.1, 11.5) |
Bledsoe County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cannon County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Crockett County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
DeKalb County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grundy County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hancock County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Humphreys County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Johnson County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lake County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Meigs County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moore County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Perry County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pickett County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Scott County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sequatchie County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stewart County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trousdale County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Van Buren County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warren County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/27/2024 3:12 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Cannon, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Grundy, Hancock, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lewis, Meigs, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Scott, Sequatchie, Stewart, Trousdale, Van Buren, Warren, Wayne
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/27/2024 3:12 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Cannon, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Grundy, Hancock, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lewis, Meigs, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Scott, Sequatchie, Stewart, Trousdale, Van Buren, Warren, Wayne
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.