Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 25.2 (24.5, 25.8) N/A 1,135 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.2, 2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) N/A 56,871 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.1, 1.3)
Shelby County 6 27.1 (25.2, 29.1) 28 (15, 45) 159 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.2, 4.6)
Davidson County 6 25.9 (23.7, 28.3) 33 (17, 52) 104 rising rising trend 8.0 (2.4, 12.2)
Knox County 6 21.2 (18.9, 23.7) 58 (35, 67) 65 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.6)
Hamilton County 6 23.1 (20.4, 26.0) 51 (26, 64) 59 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.6)
Sullivan County 6 30.2 (25.8, 35.1) 16 (4, 45) 38 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.5, 6.5)
Rutherford County 6 22.7 (19.5, 26.2) 53 (24, 67) 38 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.3)
Williamson County 6 22.9 (19.4, 26.9) 52 (22, 67) 33 stable stable trend -4.5 (-22.0, 2.2)
Sumner County 6 22.5 (18.8, 26.7) 55 (22, 68) 28 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 5.3)
Montgomery County 6 25.7 (21.3, 30.8) 36 (10, 63) 25 stable stable trend -6.8 (-17.7, 2.1)
Blount County 6 24.5 (20.1, 29.5) 41 (12, 66) 25 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 5.3)
Washington County 6 26.1 (21.4, 31.5) 32 (8, 64) 24 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.8)
Wilson County 6 23.9 (19.6, 29.0) 47 (13, 67) 23 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.4)
Sevier County 6 31.0 (25.0, 38.1) 12 (2, 53) 22 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.6, 6.1)
Maury County 6 32.6 (26.4, 39.9) 10 (1, 48) 21 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.4, 8.6)
Bradley County 6 28.2 (22.9, 34.4) 24 (4, 60) 21 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 6.4)
Madison County 6 27.5 (22.0, 34.1) 26 (5, 63) 19 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.6)
Greene County 6 30.3 (23.6, 38.4) 14 (2, 61) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 8.3)
Putnam County 6 33.9 (26.6, 42.5) 8 (1, 49) 16 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.1, 9.3)
Cumberland County 6 22.6 (17.1, 29.8) 54 (12, 70) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.8)
Anderson County 6 23.3 (17.8, 30.0) 50 (10, 70) 14 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.1, 10.9)
Roane County 6 29.0 (21.9, 38.1) 20 (2, 66) 13 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 7.4)
Robertson County 6 23.6 (17.7, 31.0) 48 (9, 70) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.4)
Tipton County 6 28.9 (21.5, 38.1) 21 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 8.0)
McMinn County 6 29.1 (21.5, 38.8) 18 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.8, 5.8)
Coffee County 6 28.3 (20.9, 37.5) 22 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-19.0, 2.7)
Cocke County 6 37.6 (27.0, 51.4) 3 (1, 56) 10 rising rising trend 5.6 (2.8, 9.2)
Hawkins County 6 24.5 (17.6, 33.3) 40 (5, 70) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 4.0)
Loudon County 6 19.9 (14.0, 27.8) 65 (14, 71) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.1, 4.1)
Gibson County 6 26.3 (18.9, 35.8) 30 (3, 70) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.7)
Hamblen County 6 20.1 (14.5, 27.4) 63 (15, 71) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.5, 6.4)
Jefferson County 6 20.5 (14.8, 28.1) 62 (15, 71) 9
*
*
Carter County 6 19.4 (13.8, 26.9) 68 (17, 71) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.7)
Bedford County 6 28.2 (20.1, 38.6) 23 (2, 69) 9 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.8, 11.6)
Lawrence County 6 27.9 (20.0, 38.2) 25 (2, 69) 9
*
*
Claiborne County 6 36.1 (25.4, 50.4) 5 (1, 63) 8 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.2, 11.3)
Dickson County 6 24.4 (17.4, 33.5) 42 (5, 70) 8 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.5, 8.5)
Monroe County 6 24.1 (16.6, 34.2) 44 (5, 71) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.9, 7.2)
Fayette County 6 22.4 (15.5, 31.7) 56 (7, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 4.4)
Rhea County 6 30.2 (20.5, 43.3) 15 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.6, 9.1)
Obion County 6 31.3 (20.8, 45.6) 11 (1, 69) 6 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.3, 11.6)
Lauderdale County 6 32.8 (21.8, 48.1) 9 (1, 68) 6 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.7, 11.9)
Marshall County 6 26.1 (17.1, 38.3) 31 (2, 71) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 7.4)
Giles County 6 24.4 (15.7, 36.7) 43 (2, 71) 6 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.3, 10.9)
Macon County 6 36.3 (23.7, 53.5) 4 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Cheatham County 6 19.9 (12.9, 29.8) 64 (9, 71) 5
*
*
Henry County 6 20.9 (13.2, 32.0) 61 (6, 71) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.7, 8.1)
Smith County 6 38.9 (25.1, 58.2) 1 (1, 67) 5 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.1, 11.5)
Campbell County 6 19.0 (12.0, 28.7) 69 (12, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.4)
Carroll County 6 26.8 (16.8, 41.0) 29 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 5.1)
Dyer County 6 21.2 (13.5, 31.8) 59 (6, 71) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 6.3)
Hardeman County 6 30.1 (19.0, 45.9) 17 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 7.8)
Hardin County 6 30.5 (19.0, 46.7) 13 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.3, 8.8)
Weakley County 6 25.9 (16.4, 39.0) 35 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.3)
Franklin County 6 17.4 (10.8, 26.7) 70 (17, 71) 5 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.4, 12.5)
McNairy County 6 29.0 (18.0, 44.6) 19 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.6, 4.8)
Chester County 6 38.7 (24.1, 59.6) 2 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Marion County 6 25.0 (15.2, 39.1) 38 (2, 71) 5 stable stable trend 4.9 (-1.3, 12.8)
Hickman County 6 25.9 (15.8, 40.7) 34 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Benton County 6 33.9 (19.5, 55.7) 7 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Fentress County 6 27.2 (15.6, 45.1) 27 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Overton County 6 25.1 (14.9, 40.3) 37 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Grainger County 6 21.4 (12.3, 35.5) 57 (3, 71) 4
*
*
Henderson County 6 19.6 (11.2, 32.0) 67 (6, 71) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 6 13.5 (7.8, 22.3) 71 (38, 71) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.2, 7.2)
White County 6 19.8 (11.4, 32.5) 66 (6, 71) 4 falling falling trend -15.5 (-37.4, -5.4)
Decatur County 6 35.0 (19.5, 60.1) 6 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Haywood County 6 20.9 (12.1, 35.4) 60 (4, 71) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.3, 6.0)
Unicoi County 6 24.0 (13.8, 40.5) 46 (1, 71) 3 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.3, 9.6)
Union County 6 24.1 (13.5, 40.5) 45 (1, 71) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.9, 7.8)
Morgan County 6 23.6 (13.0, 40.1) 49 (1, 71) 3 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.8, 10.5)
Polk County 6 24.7 (13.7, 42.6) 39 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Bledsoe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:55 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top