Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 25.4 (24.8, 26.1) N/A 1,155 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.8 (27.7, 27.9) N/A 58,425 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 24.0 (13.4, 40.6) 49 (2, 74) 3
*
*
Humphreys County 6 Rural 29.2 (16.0, 49.0) 23 (1, 74) 3 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.5, 7.3)
Scott County 6 Rural 21.4 (12.0, 36.0) 60 (4, 74) 3
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural 34.5 (19.4, 58.2) 8 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 12.7 (7.2, 21.3) 74 (42, 74) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.1, 5.8)
Stewart County 6 Urban 36.6 (20.2, 61.8) 6 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Grainger County 6 Urban 21.6 (12.4, 35.8) 59 (6, 74) 4
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural 19.6 (11.3, 32.0) 69 (7, 74) 4
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban 27.8 (15.9, 45.9) 29 (1, 74) 4 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.9, 10.1)
Overton County 6 Rural 22.8 (13.1, 37.6) 55 (3, 74) 4
*
*
Benton County 6 Rural 34.3 (19.2, 57.3) 9 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural 22.8 (13.6, 37.4) 56 (3, 74) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.3, 5.7)
Warren County 6 Rural 15.0 (8.8, 23.9) 73 (27, 74) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 1.9)
White County 6 Rural 20.9 (12.4, 33.7) 62 (6, 74) 4 falling falling trend -8.4 (-29.1, -0.7)
Fentress County 6 Rural 29.4 (17.2, 48.0) 21 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Hickman County 6 Urban 25.3 (15.2, 40.2) 43 (2, 74) 4
*
*
Unicoi County 6 Urban 31.0 (18.7, 49.8) 15 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.1, 9.1)
Marion County 6 Urban 23.5 (14.1, 37.1) 53 (3, 74) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-2.2, 10.4)
McNairy County 6 Rural 30.7 (19.1, 47.0) 17 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.3)
Smith County 6 Urban 36.8 (23.5, 55.8) 5 (1, 70) 5 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.0, 9.3)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 19.6 (12.5, 29.4) 70 (12, 74) 5
*
*
Hardeman County 6 Rural 28.0 (17.9, 42.6) 28 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.4, 6.3)
Weakley County 6 Rural 27.6 (17.5, 41.7) 32 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.8, 5.2)
Carroll County 6 Rural 29.2 (18.3, 44.3) 24 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.5, 7.0)
Dyer County 6 Rural 21.6 (14.0, 32.1) 58 (7, 74) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 7.0)
Henry County 6 Rural 19.6 (12.5, 30.1) 68 (11, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.6)
Giles County 6 Rural 23.5 (15.2, 35.5) 52 (4, 74) 6 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.8, 9.8)
Hardin County 6 Rural 29.8 (18.8, 45.3) 19 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.9, 7.2)
Chester County 6 Urban 47.5 (31.4, 69.8) 1 (1, 52) 6
*
*
Macon County 6 Urban 38.3 (25.4, 55.8) 4 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 20.7 (13.8, 30.2) 63 (12, 74) 6 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.2, 10.8)
Obion County 6 Rural 32.7 (21.8, 47.2) 10 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 10.9)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 40.4 (27.5, 57.7) 3 (1, 63) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.0, 11.3)
Marshall County 6 Rural 31.3 (21.1, 44.7) 14 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 7.7)
Fayette County 6 Urban 21.1 (14.6, 30.1) 61 (12, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 3.4)
Rhea County 6 Rural 32.4 (22.4, 45.7) 11 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.7, 7.2)
Campbell County 6 Urban 26.4 (18.3, 37.2) 35 (3, 73) 8 rising rising trend 19.8 (4.0, 32.3)
Bedford County 6 Rural 25.4 (17.9, 35.1) 42 (5, 73) 8 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.3, 10.8)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 26.3 (18.6, 36.5) 36 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 4.1)
Loudon County 6 Urban 17.4 (12.2, 24.5) 72 (30, 74) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 4.2)
Cocke County 6 Rural 35.5 (25.0, 49.1) 7 (1, 65) 9 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.7, 7.7)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 20.7 (14.8, 28.4) 64 (15, 74) 9
*
*
Hamblen County 6 Urban 19.5 (14.0, 26.6) 71 (22, 74) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.4, 5.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 28.8 (20.5, 39.6) 25 (2, 70) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.6, 6.3)
Gibson County 6 Urban 25.8 (18.8, 34.9) 38 (5, 72) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.9)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 41.2 (29.6, 56.1) 2 (1, 52) 10 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.0, 11.0)
Coffee County 6 Rural 25.5 (18.5, 34.4) 41 (5, 72) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-27.6, 2.3)
Carter County 6 Urban 22.5 (16.3, 30.6) 57 (10, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.0)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 25.8 (18.7, 34.9) 40 (5, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.1)
McMinn County 6 Rural 25.8 (18.9, 34.7) 39 (6, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.8)
Dickson County 6 Urban 30.9 (23.0, 40.9) 16 (2, 67) 11 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.4, 9.2)
Tipton County 6 Urban 29.7 (22.1, 39.1) 20 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.6)
Robertson County 6 Urban 24.2 (18.2, 31.6) 47 (9, 72) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.6)
Roane County 6 Urban 29.2 (22.1, 38.2) 22 (3, 68) 13 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.3, 6.7)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 20.4 (15.2, 27.4) 66 (20, 74) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.5)
Anderson County 6 Urban 24.9 (19.2, 31.9) 44 (9, 72) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.6, 9.5)
Putnam County 6 Rural 31.8 (24.8, 40.3) 13 (2, 59) 15 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.5, 9.8)
Greene County 6 Rural 28.7 (22.3, 36.5) 26 (4, 65) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.6, 7.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 28.0 (22.4, 34.7) 27 (6, 65) 19 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 4.1)
Bradley County 6 Urban 27.4 (22.1, 33.7) 33 (6, 66) 20 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.6)
Sevier County 6 Rural 27.6 (22.1, 34.3) 31 (6, 66) 20 stable stable trend -9.7 (-31.3, 2.3)
Maury County 6 Urban 32.2 (26.2, 39.3) 12 (2, 54) 21 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.0, 7.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 24.1 (19.7, 29.2) 48 (15, 69) 23 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.8)
Wilson County 6 Urban 23.3 (19.1, 28.3) 54 (18, 71) 23 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.8)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 24.5 (20.3, 29.3) 46 (15, 68) 25 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 5.0)
Blount County 6 Urban 26.7 (22.2, 32.0) 34 (9, 64) 27 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 5.2)
Sumner County 6 Urban 23.8 (20.0, 28.0) 51 (19, 69) 30 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.0, 5.0)
Williamson County 6 Urban 20.6 (17.3, 24.2) 65 (35, 72) 30 stable stable trend -4.5 (-19.6, 0.6)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 29.9 (25.6, 34.9) 18 (6, 54) 38 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.2)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 24.7 (21.4, 28.4) 45 (18, 65) 42 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.9)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 23.9 (21.2, 27.0) 50 (23, 65) 61 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Knox County 6 Urban 20.3 (18.1, 22.8) 67 (43, 71) 63 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.1)
Davidson County 6 Urban 26.0 (23.8, 28.4) 37 (19, 55) 107 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.1, 3.1)
Shelby County 6 Urban 27.8 (25.8, 29.8) 30 (16, 45) 162 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.0, 2.4)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 3:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bledsoe, Cannon, Clay, Crockett, Decatur, Grundy, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Meigs, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Sequatchie, Trousdale, Union, Van Buren, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top