Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 19.1 (18.7, 19.5) N/A 1,635 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Anderson County 6 Urban 16.2 (13.1, 20.0) 69 (26, 82) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.5)
Bedford County 6 Rural 23.1 (17.7, 29.6) 17 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 5.5)
Benton County 6 Rural 22.1 (14.8, 32.7) 27 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.7)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural 23.0 (15.0, 34.6) 18 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Blount County 6 Urban 24.2 (21.2, 27.6) 11 (2, 45) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Bradley County 6 Urban 21.3 (18.0, 25.1) 36 (6, 67) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 3.0)
Campbell County 6 Urban 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 55 (9, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.1)
Cannon County 6 Urban 27.2 (18.0, 40.2) 5 (1, 79) 6
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural 22.6 (16.4, 30.6) 23 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.0)
Carter County 6 Urban 22.3 (18.2, 27.3) 25 (3, 69) 21 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.5)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 25.4 (19.1, 33.1) 6 (1, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.9)
Chester County 6 Urban 14.5 (8.1, 24.2) 78 (6, 83) 3
*
*
Claiborne County 6 Rural 20.8 (15.2, 28.0) 39 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6)
Cocke County 6 Rural 19.0 (14.0, 25.4) 46 (5, 81) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.9)
Coffee County 6 Rural 17.2 (13.2, 22.1) 62 (13, 82) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.5)
Crockett County 6 Urban 16.9 (9.8, 27.8) 65 (2, 83) 3
*
*
Cumberland County 6 Rural 28.8 (24.3, 34.0) 1 (1, 30) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.6)
Davidson County 6 Urban 16.9 (15.5, 18.3) 64 (44, 75) 116 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 23.3 (16.0, 33.4) 15 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.8)
Decatur County 6 Rural 17.2 (9.9, 29.2) 59 (2, 83) 3
*
*
Dickson County 6 Urban 24.0 (18.8, 30.2) 13 (1, 70) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 6.4)
Dyer County 6 Rural 22.7 (17.0, 29.8) 21 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.7)
Fayette County 6 Urban 15.7 (11.8, 20.9) 73 (23, 83) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.8)
Fentress County 6 Rural 22.6 (15.6, 32.4) 22 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 16.3 (12.1, 21.7) 68 (16, 83) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.8)
Gibson County 6 Urban 23.1 (18.2, 29.1) 16 (1, 69) 15 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.5)
Giles County 6 Rural 16.0 (10.9, 22.8) 72 (12, 83) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.1, 1.4)
Grainger County 6 Urban 17.8 (11.8, 26.1) 54 (3, 83) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 3.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 21.7 (17.9, 26.1) 30 (5, 69) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1)
Grundy County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.5, 25.6) 76 (4, 83) 3
*
*
Hamblen County 6 Urban 20.8 (16.6, 25.8) 38 (3, 74) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.3)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 17.6 (15.9, 19.3) 56 (37, 74) 86 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.2, -3.7)
Hardeman County 6 Rural 15.5 (10.2, 23.0) 75 (9, 83) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.0, 5.8)
Hardin County 6 Rural 15.6 (10.9, 22.3) 74 (12, 83) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.2)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 21.8 (17.6, 27.0) 28 (3, 72) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.1)
Haywood County 6 Rural 24.8 (16.2, 36.7) 8 (1, 81) 6
*
*
Henderson County 6 Rural 14.4 (9.4, 21.5) 79 (12, 83) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.8, 2.7)
Henry County 6 Rural 28.5 (22.4, 36.1) 3 (1, 48) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.8, 5.5)
Hickman County 6 Urban 20.5 (14.2, 28.9) 41 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.0, 5.7)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 16.8 (10.6, 25.7) 67 (3, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.6, 3.7)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 22.7 (18.3, 28.1) 20 (2, 70) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.1)
Johnson County 6 Rural 12.6 (7.7, 20.5) 82 (25, 83) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.1, 3.0)
Knox County 6 Urban 19.5 (17.8, 21.2) 45 (25, 64) 109 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 20.8 (14.2, 29.5) 40 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 6.4)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 22.6 (17.5, 28.9) 24 (1, 75) 13 falling falling trend -22.2 (-41.4, -6.3)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.7, 15.2) 83 (60, 83) 5 stable stable trend -4.6 (-29.4, 0.9)
Loudon County 6 Urban 21.6 (17.7, 26.3) 31 (4, 70) 23 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.1, 6.2)
Macon County 6 Urban 18.1 (11.8, 26.8) 52 (3, 83) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 5.0)
Madison County 6 Urban 17.2 (14.1, 20.9) 60 (23, 80) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 4.0)
Marion County 6 Urban 17.2 (12.0, 24.3) 58 (7, 83) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.2)
Marshall County 6 Rural 28.6 (21.8, 37.1) 2 (1, 53) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 4.1)
Maury County 6 Urban 24.3 (20.4, 28.8) 10 (1, 55) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.6)
McMinn County 6 Rural 23.5 (18.9, 29.1) 14 (1, 66) 19 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.1)
McNairy County 6 Rural 16.8 (11.2, 24.5) 66 (7, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.5, 6.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 16.1 (9.0, 27.6) 71 (2, 83) 3
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 21.5 (16.9, 27.1) 34 (3, 74) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.9)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 21.6 (18.3, 25.1) 32 (6, 65) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.3)
Morgan County 6 Urban 24.4 (16.8, 34.6) 9 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.3, 6.8)
Obion County 6 Rural 18.1 (12.9, 25.0) 51 (4, 83) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.2)
Overton County 6 Rural 17.4 (11.8, 25.4) 57 (4, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.9, 2.2)
Polk County 6 Urban 21.7 (14.7, 31.7) 29 (1, 82) 6
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural 18.2 (14.6, 22.6) 49 (13, 80) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Rhea County 6 Rural 20.2 (14.6, 27.6) 42 (1, 81) 9 falling falling trend -15.6 (-33.3, -1.5)
Roane County 6 Urban 17.2 (13.5, 21.7) 61 (18, 82) 16 falling falling trend -20.4 (-34.1, -2.6)
Robertson County 6 Urban 16.2 (12.4, 20.8) 70 (20, 83) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.2)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 18.6 (16.4, 21.0) 48 (24, 73) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Scott County 6 Rural 13.1 (7.7, 21.2) 81 (16, 83) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.5, 1.5)
Sevier County 6 Rural 24.1 (20.5, 28.1) 12 (2, 52) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.4)
Shelby County 6 Urban 13.6 (12.6, 14.7) 80 (66, 82) 137 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.5, -0.5)
Smith County 6 Urban 14.8 (8.6, 23.9) 77 (6, 83) 4
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban 21.1 (12.9, 33.3) 37 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Urban 19.9 (17.4, 22.6) 44 (16, 68) 51 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Sumner County 6 Urban 22.2 (19.5, 25.1) 26 (6, 56) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.4)
Tipton County 6 Urban 21.4 (16.7, 27.0) 35 (2, 76) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 2.8)
Unicoi County 6 Urban 20.2 (13.2, 30.3) 43 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 7.1)
Union County 6 Urban 25.4 (17.3, 36.2) 7 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.0, 5.7)
Warren County 6 Rural 18.2 (13.4, 24.2) 50 (6, 82) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 21.5 (18.5, 24.8) 33 (7, 65) 39 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.1)
Wayne County 6 Rural 17.1 (10.3, 27.3) 63 (2, 83) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.9)
Weakley County 6 Rural 18.7 (13.3, 25.9) 47 (3, 82) 8 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.4)
White County 6 Rural 27.9 (21.0, 36.7) 4 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 6.4)
Williamson County 6 Urban 17.9 (15.6, 20.5) 53 (27, 75) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.4)
Wilson County 6 Urban 22.8 (19.7, 26.3) 19 (4, 57) 40 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 4.0)
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clay, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Lake, Lewis, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Sequatchie, Trousdale, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top