Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County
Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee 6 | N/A | 19.1 (18.7, 19.5) | N/A | 1,635 |
falling 
|
-4.0 (-5.8, -2.4) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) | N/A | 75,136 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.8, -1.7) |
| Shelby County 6 | Urban | 13.6 (12.6, 14.7) | 80 (66, 82) | 137 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-4.5, -0.5) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 16.9 (15.5, 18.3) | 64 (44, 75) | 116 |
stable 
|
0.0 (-1.3, 1.4) |
| Knox County 6 | Urban | 19.5 (17.8, 21.2) | 45 (25, 64) | 109 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.9, 1.1) |
| Hamilton County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (15.9, 19.3) | 56 (37, 74) | 86 |
falling
|
-6.8 (-11.2, -3.7) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Urban | 18.6 (16.4, 21.0) | 48 (24, 73) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.0, 1.1) |
| Sumner County 6 | Urban | 22.2 (19.5, 25.1) | 26 (6, 56) | 52 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.3, 2.4) |
| Sullivan County 6 | Urban | 19.9 (17.4, 22.6) | 44 (16, 68) | 51 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.5, 2.2) |
| Blount County 6 | Urban | 24.2 (21.2, 27.6) | 11 (2, 45) | 48 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.7, 2.7) |
| Williamson County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.5) | 53 (27, 75) | 47 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.5, 1.4) |
| Wilson County 6 | Urban | 22.8 (19.7, 26.3) | 19 (4, 57) | 40 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.3, 4.0) |
| Washington County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.5, 24.8) | 33 (7, 65) | 39 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.1, 3.1) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Rural | 28.8 (24.3, 34.0) | 1 (1, 30) | 36 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.9, 1.6) |
| Sevier County 6 | Rural | 24.1 (20.5, 28.1) | 12 (2, 52) | 34 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.7, 1.4) |
| Montgomery County 6 | Urban | 21.6 (18.3, 25.1) | 32 (6, 65) | 34 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.4, 3.3) |
| Bradley County 6 | Urban | 21.3 (18.0, 25.1) | 36 (6, 67) | 30 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.6, 3.0) |
| Maury County 6 | Urban | 24.3 (20.4, 28.8) | 10 (1, 55) | 29 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.9, 4.6) |
| Greene County 6 | Rural | 21.7 (17.9, 26.1) | 30 (5, 69) | 24 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.6, 4.1) |
| Loudon County 6 | Urban | 21.6 (17.7, 26.3) | 31 (4, 70) | 23 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.1, 6.2) |
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 17.2 (14.1, 20.9) | 60 (23, 80) | 22 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.3, 4.0) |
| Carter County 6 | Urban | 22.3 (18.2, 27.3) | 25 (3, 69) | 21 |
rising 
|
2.1 (0.2, 4.5) |
| Anderson County 6 | Urban | 16.2 (13.1, 20.0) | 69 (26, 82) | 19 |
stable
|
-2.3 (-5.3, 0.5) |
| Hawkins County 6 | Urban | 21.8 (17.6, 27.0) | 28 (3, 72) | 19 |
stable
|
1.1 (-1.7, 4.1) |
| McMinn County 6 | Rural | 23.5 (18.9, 29.1) | 14 (1, 66) | 19 |
rising
|
2.0 (0.2, 4.1) |
| Jefferson County 6 | Urban | 22.7 (18.3, 28.1) | 20 (2, 70) | 18 |
stable
|
1.2 (-1.2, 4.1) |
| Putnam County 6 | Rural | 18.2 (14.6, 22.6) | 49 (13, 80) | 18 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.6, 0.5) |
| Hamblen County 6 | Urban | 20.8 (16.6, 25.8) | 38 (3, 74) | 18 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.9, 3.3) |
| Henry County 6 | Rural | 28.5 (22.4, 36.1) | 3 (1, 48) | 16 |
rising
|
3.5 (1.8, 5.5) |
| Roane County 6 | Urban | 17.2 (13.5, 21.7) | 61 (18, 82) | 16 |
falling
|
-20.4 (-34.1, -2.6) |
| Monroe County 6 | Rural | 21.5 (16.9, 27.1) | 34 (3, 74) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.2, 1.9) |
| Dickson County 6 | Urban | 24.0 (18.8, 30.2) | 13 (1, 70) | 15 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.1, 6.4) |
| Gibson County 6 | Urban | 23.1 (18.2, 29.1) | 16 (1, 69) | 15 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.2, 5.5) |
| Tipton County 6 | Urban | 21.4 (16.7, 27.0) | 35 (2, 76) | 15 |
stable
|
0.5 (-3.5, 2.8) |
| Lawrence County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (17.5, 28.9) | 24 (1, 75) | 13 |
falling
|
-22.2 (-41.4, -6.3) |
| Robertson County 6 | Urban | 16.2 (12.4, 20.8) | 70 (20, 83) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.4, 1.2) |
| Bedford County 6 | Rural | 23.1 (17.7, 29.6) | 17 (1, 74) | 13 |
stable
|
1.8 (-1.1, 5.5) |
| Coffee County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (13.2, 22.1) | 62 (13, 82) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.7, 1.5) |
| Marshall County 6 | Rural | 28.6 (21.8, 37.1) | 2 (1, 53) | 12 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.3, 4.1) |
| Cheatham County 6 | Urban | 25.4 (19.1, 33.1) | 6 (1, 70) | 12 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.9, 3.9) |
| White County 6 | Rural | 27.9 (21.0, 36.7) | 4 (1, 64) | 11 |
stable
|
1.5 (-2.5, 6.4) |
| Dyer County 6 | Rural | 22.7 (17.0, 29.8) | 21 (1, 76) | 11 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.9, 5.7) |
| Fayette County 6 | Urban | 15.7 (11.8, 20.9) | 73 (23, 83) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-5.1, 4.8) |
| Cocke County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (14.0, 25.4) | 46 (5, 81) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-5.6, 1.9) |
| Campbell County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) | 55 (9, 82) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.8, 3.1) |
| Franklin County 6 | Rural | 16.3 (12.1, 21.7) | 68 (16, 83) | 10 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-6.2, 0.8) |
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 18.2 (13.4, 24.2) | 50 (6, 82) | 10 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.1, 3.9) |
| Claiborne County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (15.2, 28.0) | 39 (1, 80) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.0, 2.6) |
| Carroll County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (16.4, 30.6) | 23 (1, 78) | 9 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.4, 3.0) |
| Rhea County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (14.6, 27.6) | 42 (1, 81) | 9 |
falling
|
-15.6 (-33.3, -1.5) |
| Obion County 6 | Rural | 18.1 (12.9, 25.0) | 51 (4, 83) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-4.2, 2.2) |
| Weakley County 6 | Rural | 18.7 (13.3, 25.9) | 47 (3, 82) | 8 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.2, 5.4) |
| Marion County 6 | Urban | 17.2 (12.0, 24.3) | 58 (7, 83) | 8 |
stable
|
1.5 (-1.7, 5.2) |
| Hardin County 6 | Rural | 15.6 (10.9, 22.3) | 74 (12, 83) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-5.0, 2.2) |
| Hickman County 6 | Urban | 20.5 (14.2, 28.9) | 41 (1, 82) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-5.0, 5.7) |
| Fentress County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (15.6, 32.4) | 22 (1, 81) | 7 |
|
|
| Giles County 6 | Rural | 16.0 (10.9, 22.8) | 72 (12, 83) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-13.1, 1.4) |
| Morgan County 6 | Urban | 24.4 (16.8, 34.6) | 9 (1, 79) | 7 |
stable
|
1.4 (-3.3, 6.8) |
| Union County 6 | Urban | 25.4 (17.3, 36.2) | 7 (1, 79) | 7 |
stable
|
0.5 (-4.0, 5.7) |
| DeKalb County 6 | Rural | 23.3 (16.0, 33.4) | 15 (1, 80) | 7 |
stable
|
0.6 (-3.1, 4.8) |
| Lauderdale County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (14.2, 29.5) | 40 (1, 82) | 7 |
stable
|
2.0 (-1.7, 6.4) |
| Grainger County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (11.8, 26.1) | 54 (3, 83) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-4.3, 3.2) |
| McNairy County 6 | Rural | 16.8 (11.2, 24.5) | 66 (7, 83) | 6 |
stable
|
0.2 (-5.5, 6.4) |
| Overton County 6 | Rural | 17.4 (11.8, 25.4) | 57 (4, 83) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-5.9, 2.2) |
| Polk County 6 | Urban | 21.7 (14.7, 31.7) | 29 (1, 82) | 6 |
|
|
| Benton County 6 | Rural | 22.1 (14.8, 32.7) | 27 (1, 82) | 6 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-6.1, 1.7) |
| Unicoi County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (13.2, 30.3) | 43 (1, 83) | 6 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.6, 7.1) |
| Cannon County 6 | Urban | 27.2 (18.0, 40.2) | 5 (1, 79) | 6 |
|
|
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 24.8 (16.2, 36.7) | 8 (1, 81) | 6 |
|
|
| Bledsoe County 6 | Rural | 23.0 (15.0, 34.6) | 18 (1, 82) | 5 |
|
|
| Hardeman County 6 | Rural | 15.5 (10.2, 23.0) | 75 (9, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-6.0, 5.8) |
| Henderson County 6 | Rural | 14.4 (9.4, 21.5) | 79 (12, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.4 (-7.8, 2.7) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 10.2 (6.7, 15.2) | 83 (60, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
-4.6 (-29.4, 0.9) |
| Macon County 6 | Urban | 18.1 (11.8, 26.8) | 52 (3, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.3, 5.0) |
| Humphreys County 6 | Rural | 16.8 (10.6, 25.7) | 67 (3, 83) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-7.6, 3.7) |
| Stewart County 6 | Urban | 21.1 (12.9, 33.3) | 37 (1, 83) | 4 |
|
|
| Johnson County 6 | Rural | 12.6 (7.7, 20.5) | 82 (25, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-7.1, 3.0) |
| Wayne County 6 | Rural | 17.1 (10.3, 27.3) | 63 (2, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-5.1, 2.9) |
| Scott County 6 | Rural | 13.1 (7.7, 21.2) | 81 (16, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-2.9 (-7.5, 1.5) |
| Smith County 6 | Urban | 14.8 (8.6, 23.9) | 77 (6, 83) | 4 |
|
|
| Crockett County 6 | Urban | 16.9 (9.8, 27.8) | 65 (2, 83) | 3 |
|
|
| Decatur County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (9.9, 29.2) | 59 (2, 83) | 3 |
|
|
| Chester County 6 | Urban | 14.5 (8.1, 24.2) | 78 (6, 83) | 3 |
|
|
| Grundy County 6 | Rural | 15.1 (8.5, 25.6) | 76 (4, 83) | 3 |
|
|
| Meigs County 6 | Rural | 16.1 (9.0, 27.6) | 71 (2, 83) | 3 |
|
|
| Clay County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hancock County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Houston County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jackson County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lake County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lewis County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Moore County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perry County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pickett County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sequatchie County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trousdale County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Van Buren County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/20/2025 5:23 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clay, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Lake, Lewis, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Sequatchie, Trousdale, Van Buren
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/20/2025 5:23 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clay, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Lake, Lewis, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Sequatchie, Trousdale, Van Buren
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.