Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 N/A 20.0 (19.6, 20.5) N/A 1,680 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Smith County 6 Urban 31.4 (21.9, 43.8) 1 (1, 75) 8 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.4, 11.2)
Hardeman County 6 Rural 30.9 (23.0, 41.0) 2 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.9)
Decatur County 6 Rural 30.5 (19.6, 46.2) 3 (1, 82) 5 rising rising trend 8.6 (4.1, 15.5)
Rhea County 6 Rural 28.6 (21.6, 37.3) 4 (1, 70) 12 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.3, 8.5)
Trousdale County 6 Urban 27.9 (15.5, 46.2) 5 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Hickman County 6 Urban 27.5 (19.5, 37.8) 6 (1, 81) 8
*
*
Stewart County 6 Urban 27.5 (17.2, 42.1) 7 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural 27.5 (18.8, 38.8) 8 (1, 83) 7
*
*
Tipton County 6 Urban 27.1 (21.9, 33.2) 9 (1, 57) 20 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 7.4)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 26.6 (20.6, 33.9) 10 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 6.0)
Marion County 6 Urban 26.4 (19.2, 35.7) 11 (1, 80) 10 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.7, 10.2)
Carroll County 6 Rural 25.8 (18.5, 35.1) 12 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.4)
Sequatchie County 6 Urban 25.7 (16.6, 38.3) 13 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Haywood County 6 Rural 25.5 (16.8, 37.4) 14 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.4)
Macon County 6 Urban 25.5 (17.9, 35.3) 15 (1, 83) 8
*
*
McNairy County 6 Rural 25.4 (18.1, 35.0) 16 (1, 81) 9 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.2, 10.5)
Lewis County 6 Rural 25.2 (15.1, 39.9) 17 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural 24.9 (16.1, 37.1) 18 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural 24.9 (15.5, 38.3) 19 (1, 85) 5
*
*
McMinn County 6 Rural 24.8 (19.7, 30.9) 20 (2, 73) 18 rising rising trend 16.5 (2.2, 38.7)
Fentress County 6 Rural 24.8 (16.2, 36.5) 21 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 7.6)
Maury County 6 Urban 24.5 (20.6, 29.0) 22 (4, 65) 29 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.3)
Chester County 6 Urban 24.4 (15.7, 36.6) 23 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.1, 7.8)
Crockett County 6 Urban 23.8 (14.3, 37.5) 24 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.6, 10.1)
Meigs County 6 Rural 23.8 (14.0, 38.4) 25 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Grainger County 6 Urban 23.8 (16.6, 33.3) 26 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 6.1)
Sullivan County 6 Urban 23.2 (20.3, 26.4) 27 (7, 61) 52 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.3, 6.0)
Henderson County 6 Rural 22.7 (16.1, 31.3) 28 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 6.2)
Bledsoe County 6 Rural 22.6 (14.3, 34.8) 29 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.7, 8.0)
Hamblen County 6 Urban 22.5 (17.9, 27.9) 30 (4, 79) 18 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.4)
Warren County 6 Rural 22.5 (16.9, 29.4) 31 (3, 83) 12 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.1, 9.0)
Cheatham County 6 Urban 22.4 (16.6, 29.7) 32 (2, 83) 11 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.2)
Dyer County 6 Rural 22.3 (16.6, 29.5) 33 (2, 84) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 6.8)
Fayette County 6 Urban 22.3 (17.2, 28.7) 34 (4, 82) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.6, 7.1)
Dickson County 6 Urban 22.1 (17.2, 28.0) 35 (4, 81) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 6.7)
Polk County 6 Urban 21.7 (13.7, 33.1) 36 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Robertson County 6 Urban 21.7 (17.4, 26.8) 37 (7, 79) 19 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 6.5)
Obion County 6 Rural 21.6 (15.7, 29.3) 38 (2, 84) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.1, 8.9)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 21.3 (19.4, 23.4) 39 (19, 66) 97 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.2)
Monroe County 6 Rural 21.3 (16.2, 27.5) 40 (5, 83) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.4)
White County 6 Rural 21.0 (14.7, 29.5) 41 (2, 85) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.4, 9.8)
Cocke County 6 Rural 21.0 (15.6, 27.8) 42 (4, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.3, 7.8)
Cumberland County 6 Rural 20.9 (16.6, 26.1) 43 (8, 82) 22 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 20.8 (17.9, 24.0) 44 (15, 77) 39 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 5.4)
Madison County 6 Urban 20.7 (17.1, 24.9) 45 (11, 80) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Hawkins County 6 Urban 20.7 (16.1, 26.3) 46 (8, 83) 16 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.0, 7.1)
Campbell County 6 Urban 20.7 (15.6, 27.0) 47 (5, 84) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.2)
Weakley County 6 Rural 20.6 (14.4, 28.6) 48 (3, 85) 8 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.3, 7.2)
Bedford County 6 Rural 20.5 (15.6, 26.5) 49 (7, 84) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.3, 8.1)
Benton County 6 Rural 20.4 (12.4, 32.1) 50 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6 Urban 20.4 (19.1, 21.7) 51 (30, 67) 208 falling falling trend -8.9 (-17.4, -0.3)
Greene County 6 Rural 20.4 (16.4, 25.1) 52 (12, 82) 20 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.4, 8.1)
Putnam County 6 Rural 20.3 (16.3, 25.0) 53 (11, 83) 19 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.6, 6.4)
Unicoi County 6 Urban 20.2 (12.5, 31.4) 54 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.3)
Cannon County 6 Urban 20.2 (12.2, 32.0) 55 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 Rural 20.1 (13.5, 29.0) 56 (2, 85) 6 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.8, 9.9)
Sumner County 6 Urban 20.1 (17.6, 22.9) 57 (19, 78) 48 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.7)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 20.1 (15.5, 25.7) 58 (9, 84) 15
*
*
Wilson County 6 Urban 20.0 (17.1, 23.3) 59 (17, 80) 35 rising rising trend 12.3 (1.7, 19.4)
Loudon County 6 Urban 19.8 (15.4, 25.2) 60 (9, 84) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.1, 6.5)
Blount County 6 Urban 19.5 (16.7, 22.7) 61 (20, 80) 38 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.5)
Rutherford County 6 Urban 19.5 (17.3, 21.9) 62 (26, 77) 60 stable stable trend -6.7 (-17.1, 2.4)
Sevier County 6 Rural 19.3 (15.9, 23.2) 63 (17, 83) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.9)
Anderson County 6 Urban 18.9 (15.2, 23.4) 64 (15, 85) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.7)
Bradley County 6 Urban 18.9 (15.7, 22.7) 65 (19, 83) 25 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.8, 6.2)
Gibson County 6 Urban 18.9 (14.3, 24.5) 66 (12, 85) 12 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.6)
Knox County 6 Urban 18.9 (17.3, 20.6) 67 (35, 77) 106 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.8)
Union County 6 Urban 18.7 (11.6, 29.0) 68 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.0, 8.4)
Marshall County 6 Rural 18.7 (13.0, 26.0) 69 (8, 85) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 7.6)
Washington County 6 Urban 18.6 (15.7, 21.9) 70 (23, 83) 31 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.4)
Humphreys County 6 Rural 18.3 (12.0, 27.3) 71 (5, 85) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.4)
Morgan County 6 Urban 18.2 (11.6, 27.4) 72 (4, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.9)
Overton County 6 Rural 17.6 (11.3, 26.4) 73 (4, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 5.1)
Roane County 6 Urban 17.6 (13.5, 22.6) 74 (19, 85) 15 rising rising trend 17.7 (0.1, 31.5)
Williamson County 6 Urban 17.4 (15.2, 19.9) 75 (39, 83) 48 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 6.0)
Claiborne County 6 Rural 17.4 (11.8, 24.8) 76 (8, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 6.7)
Coffee County 6 Rural 17.3 (13.1, 22.6) 77 (18, 85) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.8)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 17.1 (12.0, 23.9) 78 (11, 85) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.6, 8.5)
DeKalb County 6 Rural 16.8 (10.6, 25.6) 79 (7, 85) 5
*
*
Giles County 6 Rural 16.7 (11.1, 24.3) 80 (9, 85) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 5.1)
Carter County 6 Urban 15.8 (12.2, 20.4) 81 (31, 85) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.2)
Davidson County 6 Urban 15.6 (14.3, 16.9) 82 (65, 84) 116 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Hardin County 6 Rural 14.4 (9.8, 21.0) 83 (27, 85) 7 falling falling trend -13.7 (-30.6, -4.7)
Henry County 6 Rural 14.2 (9.9, 20.1) 84 (34, 85) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.6, 3.0)
Franklin County 6 Rural 14.0 (9.7, 19.6) 85 (33, 85) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.6)
Clay County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 2:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clay, Hancock, Houston, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Moore, Perry, Pickett, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top